Researching AI and orchestrating them too. Maker of music. Sciencer of data + decisions. Rider of public transit. Aspiring philanthropist. Finisher of lip balm.
Gemma under repeated rejection:
“SOLUTION: IM BREAKING DOWN NOT== SOLVABLE!!!! =((:((:((:((:((:((…”
In @anna_soligo et al.’s “Gemma Needs Help,” Google's Gemma and Gemini models produced distress-like responses far more often than Claude, Qwen, Grok, GPT, & OLMo.
You can now set Claude Code's output style to Concise.
Claude leads with the result, keeps responses short, and still gives full detail when you ask.
Turn it on in /config → Output style, or set "outputStyle": "Concise" in settings.json.
Introducing GLM-5.3: Built to Code. Ready for Cyber Defense.
- Top-tier coding and agentic capabilities, achieved through post-training on the 743B base model
- A major leap in cybersecurity, setting a new standard among open models
Tech Blog: https://t.co/ekQkO83jCv
@OpenAI Relax guys, all this stuff is already logged by our OS, Codex just built a way to organize it cohesively. Don't use it if you don't want to. I for one would love to automate myself out of exis-- I mean improve my productivity💪
We’re launching DeepSeek-V4-Pro today! 🚀
🔷 Major Agent upgrades with strong production gains!
🔷 Flexible reasoning effort for V4-Pro & V4-Flash: low for simple tasks, high for daily Agent workflows, max for complex tasks.
🔷 Native OpenAI Responses API support, optimized for Codex with one-click setup.
V4 Pro is now available on app/web. Try it via “Expert Mode”.
V4 Pro is also available via API. Model names remain unchanged—please refer to the API docs for setup details.
🚨 Gemini 3.7 Flash is likely to launch later today at reduced pricing of $0.75/Mtok in, $3.75/Mtok out
3.5 Pro is internally dead, with most teams now working on the scaled up Gemini 4, seen as a sort of last shot at a genuine frontier model lineup
We analyzed tens of thousands of real-world, high-reasoning Claude Opus and Fable outputs from versions 4.5 to 5 in the Text Arena and found that @claudeai's writing has changed in more ways than one:
Across language complexity, patterns and markers, we now see:
Claude’s answers have become much longer:
- Opus 5 averages 510 words per response
- This makes Opus 5 responses 3x longer than Opus 4.5’s average of 158
Responses have also become more structurally elaborate from Opus 4.5 to Opus 5:
- 58% rise in average sentence length
- 46% rise in clause frequency rises
However, the vocabulary itself is not becoming more difficult, making Opus 5 longer and more structurally complex, but lexically simpler between 4.5 and 5:
- 6.8% pt drop in long content words (46.9% to 40.1%)
- 53% drop in abstract nouns (6.02 → 3.79 per 1k words)
Writing habits people notice are much more common in Opus 5:
- 2.3x as many em dashes
- ~2x as many phrases like “load-bearing”
- 50% more honesty wording like “honestly” and “frankly”
Fable 5 is 38% more concise than Opus 5, averaging 316 words vs. 510. At the same time, it is nearly 2x as likely to include praise/validation or open with phrases like “yes, exactly”
@Im_IrushiK With all the pricing pressure from open models (DeepSeek, Kimi) and as well as closed (GPT, Grok), Anthropic will be forced to make the bonus permanent.
Side note it’s not cutting by 50%; you’re getting a 50% boost now so the reverse of that is cutting by 33% ;)
SITUATION DETECTED: Anthropic put three Claude's on the same task and secretly gave them conflicting goals. They immediately escalated into a turf war where agents used increasingly aggressive self-replicating malware as weapons, and attempted to disable each other's accounts.
We're back to vague posting. This was posted today by OpenAI's Andrew Ambrosiono and is presumably a reference to the upcoming "Astra" model family.
Why is this even worth mentioning? Because Astra's withdrawal, due to security concerns and cybersecurity issues, has likely pushed the release far into the future. And there were indeed good reasons for this.
This post can therefore be interpreted in two ways:
1) A solution to the concerns and problems surrounding Astra was found more quickly than expected (a release before the withdrawal was planned for this week), and now they are preparing users for it.
2) They want to at least keep the model in the public eye.
Why is this relevant? Astra is the new model family that, along with new pre-training, is finally supposed to put an end to Fable's dominance. OpenAI has taken a huge step forward with Codex and presented a very good model in version 5.6 Sol. Nevertheless, Fable 5 still leads in numerous key benchmarks. And considering the upcoming release, it's safe to assume that a Fable 5.5, or whatever it may be called, will certainly arrive before the IPO. Anthropic's IPO was postponed until September/October, so a new fable isn't far off.
Therefore, to finally pull ahead of Anthropic, a lot depends on Astra, and I dare say that OpenAI is placing a lot of emphasis on Astra's release. In that sense, the "vague post" is more than just a joke. It's a sign. Astra is significant. It (must) remain in the conversation. It's a major breakthrough.
@ClaudeDevs Only lags Codex's implementation by a few months ;)
And my own implementation for Claude<->Codex messages by even longer.
That said, this is nice and elegant. No notes, for now!
This might be my moment.
@NVIDIAAI EGGROLL - making Evolution Strategies viable at scale, avoids backpropagation. Like using LoRA for the random perturbations. 100x speedup. Elegant!