@steverabinow You can't stop all spam, BIP-110 says so itself. But today an image on Bitcoin is one command + a marketplace. Under BIP110 it becomes a hand-built hack that gets filtered the moment it's shown off. Locks don't stop master thieves, they end burglary as an industry.
@BigpictureBTC Calling one “policy” and the other “consensus” doesn’t settle the debate. What matters is how Bitcoin functions: what nodes relay, what miners see, and what the network enables. If v30’s default was practically meaningless because operators can override it, why change it?
@w_s_bitcoin "If you want to have strong opinions on whether you should take a COVID vaccine, first take the time to complete six years of medical school."
@MrHodl@1914ad That may justify your preferred default, but it concedes my point: the old default mattered enough to hinder users and push activity into private channels. So “anyone could change their settings” cannot also be used to dismiss the impact of changing it. Defaults shape the network
@w_s_bitcoin@MrHodl@1914ad You might be right, and I’m open to being educated in good faith. But saying I haven’t paid attention isn’t an argument. What exactly am I missing about why changing a configurable default was necessary if defaults supposedly don’t materially shape network behavior?
@MrHodl@1914ad 1MB being consensus-valid since 2010 is beside the point. If defaults don’t matter because nodes could already raise the limit, why change the default and risk this backlash? The change itself proves defaults matter.
@HodlMagoo I care about privacy too. That's why I care about keeping Bitcoin decentralized. If a handful of influential players increasingly shape Bitcoin's direction, meaningful privacy improvements become less likely
@LynAldenContact@ScarcityMan You're not answering his claim. BIP-110 doesn’t make hidden abuse impossible. It reduces Bitcoin’s OFFICIAL channel for arbitrary data. Legally, that distinction is decisive: providing a supported storage function is not the same as being exploited through unintended use
@_Francesco_R@MarcanoFilms@saylor “Rushed”? Months of public debate, multiple releases, delayed activation. “Arbitrary”? The limits restore longstanding policy and preserve monetary/cryptographic use. Openness does not mean subsidizing arbitrary data. Doing nothing raises node costs and weakens Bitcoin as money.
@nvk That might be so. But if it is. What makes bitcoin different from fiat? Central powers vulnerable to corruption hold the power in the structure you describe. And how does those structures "protect my bitcoin" from tyranny
I travel with KLM again on 13 July and need this resolved before then. Please assign a real case owner, restore the case history, escalate this to EuroBonus back office, and correct the points/status before my trip.
@SAS I need someone to take ownership of a EuroBonus case that has been pending since Dec 2025. This is no longer a simple points issue — it has caused loss of status, extra airport expenses and may affect my Lifetime Gold qualification.
Meanwhile, I have been downgraded from Gold to Silver, lost SkyTeam Elite Plus benefits, incurred additional airport expenses due to missing status benefits, and the erroneous downgrade may have broken my Lifetime Gold qualification streak.