@ThomasEWoods I’ve actually been sold on the idea of no longer using white or black because there is no such thing as either outside of US civil rights legal history. And that was fucked, anyhow. Use more descriptive language around actual groups that carry some meaning. And white isn’t that.
@RCarhartHarris@michaelpollan Is the main thrust of your rejection of the blinding strategy that you believe the conscious experience is the mechanism such that it’s like treating low blood sugar with a BIG sugar pill? I.e, treatment and placebo inherently confounded?
@lawrencepatihis I had thought IFS was a niche crazy thing that only the worst of the memory recovery people would use but it’s had a huge surge in use.
@lawrencepatihis Easy…objective measurement. The lived experience concept (even but not just implicitly) has always been an attempt to undermine attempts at objectivity.
@FCisnotComm@FCisnotScience See, that is the type of thing. You know, the animal show of Clever Hans is one of the reasons that people who know are so skeptical of FC. Maybe there should be more modern animal demonstrations? Monkeys and dogs writing shakespeare? It may sound like a joke but I’m serious.
@ellanimall@CarolynGorman_@AbigailShrier Also, I clicked your link, went to research database, and went to outcome research and: (lol, I’m sure it’s temporary but still funny)
@AlResearch222@FCisnotScience No but I would look if I had a link. I know they (conveniently) say it is unethical for reasons I don’t really know. Other than than it is conclusive and undermines use of the technique.
@ellanimall@CarolynGorman_@AbigailShrier I have never been able to find a play therapy study outperforming a comparison group controlling for attention and expectations when treating a mental health condition. Usually just stuff like improved emotion language or parent report of relationship compared to nothing.
@FCisnotScience I agree completely that the technique is inherently diminishing of autonomy if not even more harmful than that. Also, that the burden of proof SHOULD be on proponents.
I guess I’m just trying to think about how to convince people. Lesser of evils. Protections would important.
@FCisnotComm@berutei@FCisnotScience That seems to be the heart of the matter. I think social sciences approach domains that have historically been religious or political and those boundaries have not always been negotiated well
@berutei@FCisnotScience I know, it’s very frustrating, but I don’t think “scientific consensus” is enough to use force to compel people to stop doing their religious beliefs even when I agree their beliefs are a crime against humanity.
@FCisnotScience I’ve seen some of that and what I’ve seen is compelling to me. Truly, a horror show to watch that makes it mind boggling that proponents can see it.
But I mean explicit “I said that” and “ she said that” PECS.
@GadSaad Serious question: isn’t “empathy” being used wrong in your book title? That is, do you believe the people accused of sucidal empathy actually have insight into the alleged murderous feelings of other’d folks? Wouldn’t empathy scare the westerners or whoever into isolationism?
@berutei@FCisnotComm@FCisnotScience Idea: get independent users of legitimate nonverbal assistive tech to get “spellered” and then interview them about experiences after. I know it’ll have to be rudimentary when legitimate. Has this been tried?