Fr. Gregory Pine did the best treatment of this question when he was interviewed by Alex O'Connor.
Alex: "What if someone sincerely searches for God, but no matter what he does, he is simply unconvinced?"
Fr. Pine: "That's impossible and he'd be culpable for living in denial."
@BigWizard40@IesusRexEst If there's a being with enough power to create the totality of all there is, then surely he also has the power to manipulate matter in that manner
@waldenpod@FeelsGuy2003 Yes it is possible, and no, sometimes ignorance is invincible (not the person's fault), but insofar as someone has the opportunity to overcome the ignorance but chooses not to, they are culpable, as the priest said in the clip
@waldenpod@FeelsGuy2003 Well it's not a cop-out to the objection "This thing existing disproves your worldview" and I go "Nuh-uh". It's rather a conclusion from the first principles that God's existence is knowable through reason unaided by revelation
@Sapientia400 I had the impression they were understanding each other fine, it seemed like a genuine conversation albeit more about the moral struggle aspect of the faith, rather than the intellectual aspect, which might be what you're used to with Alex.
@m966021 How does culpability work in your head, are we culpable for any moral evil that we enact? Or do you think that if we believed it was evil, we wouldn't do it, therefore we're not culpable
@m966021 If someone sincerely sought, he would believe. If someone sincerely doesn't believe, they haven't sincerely sought
They are culpable insofar as they haven't acted to solve their ignorance, or insofar as they actively refuse to conform to something they know is a moral precept
@UnredeemedZoomr Well...Sometimes, when judging people's motivations, it's prudent not to take their words at face-value. Sometimes it's more likely that they're lying. We do it all the time, every time that we say "I don't think he's telling the truth" about someone.