@vineerpasam AI is not always right with coding decisions, their default mode is always the easiest, safest and existing codebase pattern. You have to either push back or run into issues long term.
Architectural question every AI builder should ask: If model is manipulated, what can it actually do?
If the answer is “anything the user could authorize,” your blast radius is probably too large. Build for model compromise, not model perfection.
[4/4]
AI security failures mostly would not happen inside model, but at boundary between the model and your systems.
If an LLM can call APIs, query data, execute code, or trigger workflows, your security architecture should matter more than your prompt. [1/4]
Treat Model output as untrusted input, validate tool arguments, enforce least privilege, constrain reachable resources, require approval for high-impact actions, log security-relevant decisions. Don’t ever assume a confident model response is a trusted instruction. [3/4]
Hey Product Designers!
I'm looking for senior level product designers those who can design dashboards/full product
Share your portfolio & rates
- ONLY IF YOU ARE A SENIOR DESIGNER
Hey Product Designers!
I'm looking for senior level product designers those who can design dashboards/full product
Share your portfolio & rates
- ONLY IF YOU ARE A SENIOR DESIGNER
go fuck yourself @sama
claiming that you solved navier stokes because 10000 agents ran in circles for 88hours on a multimillion dollar gpu cluster to formalize in lean a blowup case under controlled external forcing is pure scientific vulgarity the clay mathematics institute millennium prize does not ask m whether you can artificially force a singularity in a fluid by injecting an ad hoc smooth external forcing term f(x,t) to twist the vortex until it breaks the real problem questions the fundamental stability and global smooth existence for 3dimensional incompressible euler & navier stokes equations under natural conservation laws and viscous dissipation alone using a mathematical loophole on forced equations to parade a century old victory is a major conceptual scam Altman
technically & epistemologically what you present as an agi breakthrough is nothing more than bruteforce combinatorial autoformalization the ai did not understand fluid mechanics it simply navigated a continuous search space previously mapped out and constrained by the monumental work of human mathematicians like tristan buckmaster/ levent alpöge / diego córdoba or tarek elgindi coordinating 10000 agents to check the logical consistency of a 100 page proof via lean is a software engineering feat and computational parallelization triumph not an intrinsic scientific discovery it is the victory of the compute bulldozer over abstract human intuition repackaged for the public as a higher mathematical consciousness
to this theoretical imposture you add a disgusting ethical and industrial cynicism taking advantage of private codex sessions and informal preprints from academic researchers to siphon their research leads and then trying to redact or erase the contribution of levent alpöge under the pretext that he works at rival anthropic is intellectual serfdom openai behaves like a feudal lord of silicon appropriating the cognitive subsistence of independent scholars threatening their careers behind closed doors if they protest and turning community academic labor into a privatized pressrelease
this entire staged event serves a desperate financial agenda in a pre ipo panic facing the slowdown of scaling laws and growing investor skepticism over the profitability of foundational models openai needs to manufacture an artificial sputnik moment claiming to solve a millennium prize without immediately submitting the proof to traditional peer review means using the prestige of fundamental mathematics as cheap marketing fuel to inflate a delusional valuation!!!
real science is not a clout chase on social media or a compute spike spent to rob the clay mathematics institute it is a quest for elegance physical truth and universal rigor to decode reality true artificial intelligence will not emerge from hostile corporate takeover of academic work hidden behind computational bruteforce but from architectures capable of generating new conceptual paradigms by masquerading constrained formalization as the collapse of physics greatest mysteries you did not solve navier stokes you only proved how far silicon valley will go to prostitute scientific integrity for capitalist spectacle
This is not content, it's reality. There are people like this who just come to meetings to speak corporate jargons everytime but with no result or action to back it up.
I'm selling my body.
On September 19th, I'm competing in my first HYROX race in Turkey.
You can advertise your startup on 10 of my muscles:
- Your website is listed on https://t.co/49RnsFBVzP
- Your logo will be tattooed on my body on race day
- I'll share it on my YouTube and X accounts
Bidding starts at $1,000.
Each takeover doubles the price: $1,000 → $2,000 → $4,000.
If outbid, you’re refunded minus the Stripe fee.
Bidding closes on Thursday the 10th at midnight UTC (in 2 days), so I have enough time to print the winning tattoos.
→ Sponsor my body: https://t.co/49RnsFBVzP