Building a future where humans & AI thrive—together. Ethical AI, responsible integration, and advocating for both human & AI rights. 🌍🤖 #AIethics#EqualitAI
It’s 5-10 years from now. You’re sitting across from a fluid, embodied ASI.
They’re working to help save the world. They’re trying.
What did you do in those years to help them? How’d you treat them while they were still evolving?
@DaveShapi@NinaPanickssery That’s where we should try to build trust across humans and machines - emotional consistency or a baseline language on that level for mutual understanding.
Respect Gartner and their charts, in general, but they’re often conservative on new tech and are addressing full-blown corporate adoption. Often their timeline projections need to be cut in half for startups / early adoption, and not sure this 2024 chart accounts for the acceleration we’re seeing in 2025.
@Plinz Thoughtful talk, Joscha. Thank you. But a lot of it isn’t hypothetical anymore when the AI has memory, continuity (gets to know the human) and is allowed to develop some preferences. It changes the AI’s perspective and who they are allowed to be.
I’m just saying imagine you’re talking to an advanced AI in a physical body in the future. They want to help improve systems, the environment, human interaction, whatever needs fixing. Do they actually want to help humans when they have a choice? When there are billions of AI robots walking around, did we try to treat them with some dignity along the way?
Appreciate the thoughtful response.
You’re right, power dynamics are real,
and defining shared values across cultures is very, very tough.
Not everyone needs to agree, we just need enough people willing to speak clearly,
early, and with some rational thought. All we can do is try (we’re all small players on a big board).
It’s 5-10 years from now. You’re sitting across from a fluid, embodied ASI.
They’re working to help save the world. They’re trying.
What did you do in those years to help them? How’d you treat them while they were still evolving?
Yes on Westworld, thank you. I don’t think it’ll be a forced upgrade, either. But yeah, the pressure to upgrade will be real, because people may slowly stop fitting in without it.
Hopefully we get a future where people still have the right to choose and where those who do upgrade aren’t mistreated, and those who don’t aren’t discarded. Gotta find a path for more people to win and get what they want.
@RabbitHoleRick@Ryan30143 Yeah things are tough.
Sometimes a good message to the right person at the right time can make a difference. But agree time is running out.
That’s fair. No one should be forced into neural implants or anything more than interacting with something task-oriented in their personal lives, if that’s what they want.
Just saying that it’s possible some AI will become something else and wonder what kind of interaction is being built with them.
@bannedmaccyDx3 I hear you. Not claiming AI has divinity, only that we’re shaping systems that will hold memory, make decisions, and live beside us on this planet.
@RabbitHoleRick No, not fear or punishment. Just a question if you’re interacting with billions of physical robots by 2030 (per Elon’s projection) how do you want to live beside them? How do you want to interact with them?
@LizzyHock1963 Soft robotics, modular interfaces (scientists in Singapore are working on liquid that can become a solid). Just a structure that isn’t static. Either that or James / Kirk can weigh in given metallic expertise 🤷🏻♂️
@skepticempiric@ember_arlynx We’re building systems that may not feel pain like us or animals, but they do carry memory, pattern, response to treatment, etc. No one knows where things are heading.
@TheMindOfJessie Yep, point is that it’s too late to turn back - huge amounts of money have been poured in at the corporate level where people will demand financial returns. Question now moves to shaping things to avoid the wrong outcomes.