@Peter_Bukowski It’s gonna be hilarious to watch all of Indiana realize that completing 5/10 passes and making heroic drive-extending plays while relying on turnovers from the defense isn’t sustainable
@briankeepsworth@ThoughtfulSaint Established doctrine be damned; what he says goes, and it’s your fault for taking LDS leaders or church-published documents seriously.
It’s clownish behavior all the way down. But when confronted with this, instead of any honest introspection, he just types, “Lol” and moves on
@briankeepsworth@ThoughtfulSaint Jacob presents a version of Mormonism that is largely divorced from the mainstream and historical church. He then tries to gaslight any interlocutors by saying they just “don’t understand” LDS doctrine, even when presented with scripture, prophets, or church-published manuals.
@Lets_Talk_HC “If God wants us all in heaven, why did He give us rational souls capable of free will and rejecting His love? Seems like He wants us to sin.”
See how silly your argument is?
@Lets_Talk_HC Oh no he’s doing Jacob Hansen’s glib, sanctimonious “try again” schtick. Bruh if you’re gonna be Temu Jacob (who is already Dollar-Store Ostler) at least shake it up a *little* bit.
@Lets_Talk_HC@CapturingChrist He doesn’t even realize the Gospel of John literally uses Greek philosophy when describing Christ as the *logos*
The rest is just him saying, “Hmm, is it possible my reading of scripture is wrong?…No, it’s philosophy and reason that’s wrong!”😂
@Peter_Bukowski Rhyan was better than Jenkins at Center as well, so hopefully with a full offseason at the position that’ll be two upgraded positions, not to mention Zach Tom actually (🤞) staying healthy
We are not, and frankly I think you're either working with very limited information or your moral compass is broken to think that we are.
When I met RFM in person, I realized he actually delights in the discomfort of others. He is one of the most disgusting individuals I've ever had the discomfort of interacting with. I get why, if you don't see through the lies he repeatedly tells, and haven't seen things like his slimy Come Follow Me podcast he made to lure people who didn't know his content into gotcha traps you might think that - but I'll just chalk this up to you not really understanding just how horrific of a person this guy actually is.
Please, never ever compare me with that repugnant loser again.
And he and Bill are not more balanced on the data than Cardon and Jonah. I understand you might think that if you have accepted some of their erroneous presuppositions, or if you just don't actually believe in God or angels or miracles - but all they do is tear down. Their philosophies make the people who follow them miserable, while people who watch our show get inspired to fix their lives and get back in alignment with God and their families.
@emuse1955@ThoughtfulSaint Jacob only talks *to* people if, (1) they don’t know enough about Mormonism’s minutia to call out his particular brand of BS; or (2) he can control the environment enough to only ever play offense. He’s a polemicist and a propagandist; not a good-faith interlocutor.
@emuse1955@Bongo83948@Victori17950257@KramersFaith Definitely not in practice. The current LDS president once gave a speech where he outright defends not telling “the whole truth”, even though that’s in direct contraction to the LDS “Gospel Principles” manual about lying.
https://t.co/LfpZrW3I4d
https://t.co/MZrsddzIxC
@SimplyWithFaith@RigdonNancy3@ThoughtfulSaint Would him writing to someone’s stake president to try and get them excommunicated count? Or maybe him making half a dozen videos of that person by name and then claiming he never focused on her personally?
@ThoughtfulSaint@stackerco Jacob: *has a wide variety video series about Julie Hanks specifically (including one with seven parts) and writes to her stake president trying to get her excommunicated.
Also Jacob: “I never have and never will be focused on Julie.”
@timotheeology@ShamelessPopery Maybe he won’t “defend [his] ground” because it isn’t actually his ground in the first place, man. “Debate me and defend the position I assign to you or it’s a dodge!” C’mon, man, be serious.
@jkimballcook@InformedSaints Then he isn’t using “cognate set” correctly. Regardless, any apologetic relying on linguistics requires the original allegedly ancient words and sentence structure to be preserved, which necessarily requires a tight translation.
@jkimballcook@InformedSaints What do you mean, “why”? A cognate-set apologetic requires individual English words having a common origin with another language, meaning the BoM translation process had to be word-for-word, or “tight”, as opposed to a “loose” or “conceptual” revelatory process.