@andrewgwils Okay, I feel that this is not a productive discussion, because you have a strong prior that I'm an angry grad student or something. Not actually true.
More or less you have one interpretation and I have another. Not sure what to do with that. Have a good one.
@andrewgwils I mean, you yourself are being pretty disrespectful by crapping on your colleagues online without most of them being aware. Sorry you got called out, idk what to say. Have a good rest of your weekend.
@andrewgwils Did I insult you? Actually confused by this claim lol. You might have me confused with some other replies that you got.
As for the substance of your reply it's very easy to tell that I'm not well optimized for scoring social media points
@littmath@tonyyueyu The withdrawn preprints still seem like a cool approach. Using mirror symmetry to construct the right sheaves instead of semiregularity, if i understand correctly
@andrewgwils you literally work at courant. why not just talk to your colleagues instead of trying to score points against them on social media? huge L
@the_good_matty the number of smart ML people i know irl who are letting anon chuds on X shape their thinking about the math situation is staggering
yes, there is a possibility here that i'm not exploring
@nihilunbounded@xobnu Justification is the interesting thing here. The drug-addled finance bro deals with immediate intelligibilities: no school is needed to feel the power of money. His whole `career' deals in producing commodities, nothing more. It is a plane of rapidity because understanding is
@nihilunbounded i don't think these two viewpoints have to live in tension or be compared. we are free to ignore the answers that we see and come up with our own - this is what my best colleagues do anyways. and being curious and finding answers is fine.
- release all the problem statements that were tried along with partial solutions if any. no human parallel here, but this would be tremendously helpful for building on, and for getting a better understanding of capabilities.
6/6
- be willing to have scientific and policy discussions with people who aren't tenured professors at Harvard/Stanford. i get that AI/ML academia is very hierarchical and power is concentrated in a small handful of labs, but this is not true for all fields.
5/n
@rperezmarco You're the expert, but isn't the statement claimed the full Birkhoff conjecture without additional conditions? Continuous foliation by invariant circles near the boundary implies the table is an ellipse
@nihilunbounded@JohnBal14046363 maybe the feehan-leness type argument in this paper will be useful in the future? the sheer complexity of these moduli spaces will probably make this too hard without ai assistance though
@wokecisally@nihilunbounded 2. is """standard""" but incredibly complicated. 3. i've just never seen anyone try to compute these kinds of moduli spaces (besides pidstrigach-tyurin, or the feehan-lenness monster works)