I've made that point before:
- LLM: 1E13 tokens x 0.75 word/token x 2 bytes/token = 1E13 bytes.
- 4 year old child: 16k wake hours x 3600 s/hour x 1E6 optical nerve fibers x 2 eyes x 10 bytes/s = 1E15 bytes.
In 4 years, a child has seen 50 times more data than the biggest LLMs.
1E13 tokens is pretty much all the quality text publicly available on the Internet. It would take 170k years for a human to read (8 h/day, 250 word/minute).
Text is simply too low bandwidth and too scarce a modality to learn how the world works.
Video is more redundant, but redundancy is precisely what you need for Self-Supervised Learning to work well.
Incidentally, 16k hours of video is about 30 minutes of YouTube uploads.
The emotional intensity inside must burn hot enough to protect you against the chilling effects of doubt, uncertainty, criticism, and failure. Only deep desire can generate such heat.
#FridayMotivation
After reading the @nytimes lawsuit against @OpenAI and @Microsoft, I find my sympathies more with OpenAI and Microsoft than with the NYT.
The suit:
(1) Claims, among other things, that OpenAI and Microsoft used millions of copyrighted NYT articles to train their models
(2) Gives examples in which OpenAI models regurgitated NYT articles almost verbatim
But the presentation muddies (1) and (2), and I saw a lot of commentary on social media that -- because of what I believe is a muddied presentation -- draws a link between them that I'm not sure is what people think it is.
On (1): I understand why media companies don't like people training on their documents, but believe that just as humans are allowed to read documents on the open internet, learn from them, and synthesize brand new ideas, AI should be allowed to do so too. I would like to see training on the public internet covered under fair use -- society will be better off this way -- though whether it actually is will ultimately be up to legislators and the courts.
On (2): I suspect a lot of the examples of ChatGPT regurgitating articles nearly verbatim were due to a RAG-like mechanism where the user prompt causes the system to browse the web, retrieve a specific article and then print it out. (If my statement here isn't accurate, I would love to see the @nytimes clarify this.) If this is the case, then (i) To OpenAI's credit, they seem to have already updated their software to make this much less likely, and (ii) This is also a much easier problem to fix than if an LLM were to regurgitate text using only the pre-trained weights, which AFAIK very rarely happens (and which, given its rarity, also raises the question of how much harm to NYT this has actually caused).
To be clear, I believe independent media is important for democracy and must be protected. I also sympathize with media businesses worried about Generative AI disrupting their businesses. But I'm not convinced the NYT lawsuit is the right way to do this.
Usual caveat: I am not a lawyer and am not giving legal advice or any other form of advice here.
You can also read more details of my take on this below. https://t.co/wkZSMHsvNA
A common problem faced by researchers is finding and using information from scientific papers. 🔍
Gemini's capabilities mean it can accurately uncover knowledge within thousands of files including dense text & complex images.
How could this help deliver breakthroughs faster? ↓
We’re excited to announce 𝗚𝗲𝗺𝗶𝗻𝗶: @Google’s largest and most capable AI model.
Built to be natively multimodal, it can understand and operate across text, code, audio, image and video - and achieves state-of-the-art performance across many tasks. 🧵 https://t.co/mwHZTDTBuG
So often people are working hard at the wrong thing. Working on the right thing is probably more important than working hard.
#Entrepreneurship#leadership#startup
“I shall pass this way but once; any good, therefore, that I can do or any kindness that I can show to any human being, let me do it now. Let me not defer nor neglect it, for I shall not pass this way again.”
#Gratitude#LifeLessons
GPT-4 and GPT-3.5 Turbo models in the API now support calling your custom functions, allowing the model to use tools you design for it. Also — reduced pricing & new model versions (including 16k context for 3.5 Turbo): https://t.co/dalfgEQ9k2
📢 Attention aspiring data scientists! Ready to become a data scientist? Follow this roadmap 🗺️:
1. Lay the Foundation
2. Master Data Analysis
3. Learn Machine Learning
4. Dive into Deep Learning
.
.
.
👇🧵
📊 Remember, the choice of activation function depends on your specific task and network architecture.
Experimentation and careful consideration of the task at hand will guide you towards the optimal choice. 🧪
Have any questions or thoughts, drop them in the comments.🤗💬
In summary:
- Sigmoid: Suitable for binary classification and when you need values between 0 and 1.
- Tanh: Useful when you need values between -1 and 1.
- ReLU: Ideal for deep networks, due to its computational efficiency.
- Leaky ReLU: Effective when dealing with dead neurons.