flanktwo

The darkest hour has only sixty minutes.

[flanktwo @flank2]

@jumperz Yep. 100% nerfed. Anyone claiming this is on the same level it was before clearly wasn't maxing out it's capabilities then.

[flanktwo @flank2]

@claudeai "until July 7"
😂
I'm out. Y'all are ridiculous. Moving production SAAS to openai, and agentic to openai + local

[flanktwo @flank2]

@AnthropicAI Wen fable level open model. Closed frontier is cooked going forward

[flanktwo @flank2]

@edgeful IB

[flanktwo @flank2]

The 16th amendment didn't give the feds that power

"the provisions of the Sixteenth Amendment conferred no new power of taxation but simply prohibited the previous complete and plenary power of income taxation possessed by Congress from the beginning from being taken out of the category of indirect taxation to which it inherently belonged"

[flanktwo @flank2]

@lanto_trades Best goddamn trader on x
Let's see what the trolls will bitch about this time

[flanktwo @flank2]

@tradingview Your "system" is flagging people with custom domains as emails and claiming this is magical proof of professional status.

Y'all are fucking retarded

[flanktwo @flank2]

@WurtApp @WallStreetApes @grok @grok
who makes Tesla vehicles
who makes Microsoft operating systems
who makes Apple iphones

brainrot

[Shanto @ashiqur_ai]

I made $7K in 3 days with this OpenClaw agent setup.

It scrapes Trading View indicators, converts them to Python backtests, and runs everything automatically.

Zero coding needed after initial setup.
I’ve prepared the exact step-by-step guide.
Free access for 24 hours.

To get it:
1. Comment "OpenClaw"
2. Like & Retweet & Save this post.
3. Follow me @techwithashiqur

(so I can DM you)

You will learn:

Scraping 50+ indicators from Trading View using AI prompts.
Converting Pine Script to Python automatically.
Running BTC backtests without manual input.
Setting up CSV and GitHub logging.
Handling AI agent errors and shortcuts.
Complete prompt engineering workflow.
Sub-agent spawning for parallel testing.

Trading View has hundreds of indicators with free source code.

Testing them manually takes years. Most traders give up after 5 to 10.

This system runs while you sleep and tests everything.

You need to go through dozens of bad strategies before finding winners.

Humans burn out. AI agents do not.

The guide walks you through the entire framework. Real 6-hour build that works, not theory.

Comment "OpenClaw" below and I will send you everything.

Must Follow me @techwithashiqur

to get the DM.

Disclaimer: This is not financial advice. Crypto trading is extremely risky and may result in total loss. Always do your own research.

[flanktwo @flank2]

Sustainability aside, jo successful company that is doing well, completely rewrites their entire business model. Introduce new plans side by side with their long running ones? Sure. Hit delete on existing and introduce an entirely new set of plans and rulesets they have little to no experience with in order to evaluate both conversions and payouts? Nah. This is a hail mary for them

[flanktwo @flank2]

Lol the Pentagon factored it in for OpenAI the same night. Apparently identical terms. In writing.

And the "example" being made here isn't "comply or else." It's "comply or else, unless you're a different company, in which case we'll agree to the same thing."

1k+ people liked this brainrot celebrating a standard it then abandoned

Y'all are wild

[flanktwo @flank2]

@davec_NH Literally every sentence you just typed is wrong.

[flanktwo @flank2]

"A private company was essentially demanding final say over US defense policy." No. A private company asked the government to put two things in writing. The government said no to Anthropic, then said yes to OpenAI. That's picking a winner because one publicly and firmly set their own line in the sand

[flanktwo @flank2]

@sama So openai just got the two carveouts that anthropic wanted.

Supply chain risk is indefensible. Anthropic will destroy the admin in court

[flanktwo @flank2]

You've made their case for them

If the carve outs are "already illegal per US law," then the admin blew up a contract, designated an American company a supply chain risk, and had the President threaten "major civil and criminal consequences" rather than agree to put "we won't do the illegal things" in writing.

[flanktwo @flank2]

the government bypassed every democratic institution here. No congressional debate, no hearing and no due process. Secdef issued an ultimatum on X. The President attacked the company on social media. Declared, without authority, supply chain risk with no notice.

Accountability was literally violated by the gov itself.

[flanktwo @flank2]

@asynchronous_x as a "former contractor that made software for the Feds," you should know that contract terms are negotiated before award, and that the government modifying its demands post award is a different situation than a vendor pulling a bait and switch.

[flanktwo @flank2]

@ChrisRMcGuire It's contradictory because it was written by a child throwing a tantrum. And it's not an order. They could not have complied with the statute's requirements.

[flanktwo @flank2]

Secdef gave a CEO a 5-day ultimatum, the President called the company radical left on social media, and then they invoked a statute designed for foreign adversaries to blacklist an American company for maintaining terms of service on its own product.

...but the company is the one with the god complex?

...

[flanktwo @flank2]

@TomSawyerFw @adamkovac I realize you won't understand but you're proving my point as to failure to research and understand what, legally, constitutes a supply chain risk. You read it, and still don't get it, but that's okay 👍