Have you noticed that the media been only showing celebs responses to Brandy sayings but never the video of what she actually said. The Vs. Chapter makes sense now.
Racism and Islamophobia are so deeply embedded in North America and Europe, and Muslim life deemed so worthless, that Westerners imagine the weapons used on Muslims will never be used in our own societies against 'people like us'.
Even the racists and Islamophobes should be concerned about Jewish supremacism, if only for their own self-interest.
She's going to move to Miami and in 10 years, she's going to tweet: “the people of Argentina yearn to be free” about how the US should bomb her grandma's house
Israeli settlers sprayed pepper spray in a Palestinian girl’s face when Palestinians tried to stop them from sending their livestock onto farmland to graze on and ruin crops, people being attacked simply for defending their own land and livelihood.
Brandy receives a 30 second applause while on her visit at the ‘The Jennifer Hudson Show’, and Jennifer praises the music icon for her influence on Pop/R&B.
‘You’re one of my dream guest, it’s an honor to have you here. You’re an icon. — Jennifer.
A child carrying water…
when he should be carrying dreams.
We go to the distant camps
For many families There, even water is a daily struggle.
But together, we can bring a little relief.
https://t.co/cxBbAukofW
Your kindness can make a real difference 🤍
A young Palestinian girl Masa in Masafer Yatta, in the southern West Bank, tells a passerby she is too scared to go to school because Israeli occupation army vehicles have moved into the area. When asked where she is headed instead, she says she wants to go to her father.
This the daily life in Masafer Yatta, a cluster of Palestinian communities in the South Hebron Hills that the Israeli occupation has designated "Firing Zone 918" for decades as a tool of ethnic cleansing. Just days ago, Israeli occupation forces fired live ammunition and tear gas at a Palestinian shepherd in the area, while in March, Israeli occupation forces kidnapped three brothers after Israeli colonial terrorists attacked their homes. Occupation forces also demolished residential structures and a sheep barn in the area that same month. For the children of Masafer Yatta, the threat is not abstract, it is parked outside their school gates.
jaradat.sari (IG)
-Halle Bailey "i wanna be down"
-India Arie "he is"
-Ariana Grande " afrodisiac"
- Jazmine Sullivan "have you ever"
- Kehlani " right here departed"
- Kim Burrell " almost doesn't count"
- Tory Kelly " sitting up in my room"
Iran’s foreign policy has long been shaped, indeed constrained, by two enduring syndromes: the “Herat Syndrome” and the “Faw Syndrome.” These twin pathologies have persistently influenced its strategic behavior.
The Herat Syndrome refers to the absence of strategic patience; the Faw Syndrome reflects the inability to translate military gains into diplomatic advantage.
The roots of the Faw Syndrome go back to the capture of the Faw Peninsula during Operation Valfajr-8 on February 9, 1986. That victory led Iranian leaders at the time to believe a total defeat of Iraq was within reach, reducing their willingness to show flexibility in negotiations. Yet the military success failed to yield a diplomatic outcome, and the war ultimately ended with the acceptance of UN Security Council Resolution 598.
The Herat Syndrome reflects a lack of strategic patience; the failure to endure long enough to secure geopolitical gains. It traces back to the 1856 recapture of Herat by Hessam al-Saltaneh. As the Indian Rebellion loomed, he warned the Shah: “Whatever you ask of the British, they will concede. Do not give away your gains.” Yet Naser al-Din Shah, at the critical moment, granted major concessions to a weakened Britain.
Today, the issue of the Strait of Hormuz and the 400 kilograms of enriched uranium may once again be caught in this same dual trap.
The risk is clear: neither the “moment of conversion” is properly recognized, nor the “strategic patience” required to capitalize on it is sustained.
The outcome might be a breakdown between military operations and diplomatic action, neither translation nor continuity emerges between the two.
This is where history repeats itself; this time, at a far greater cost.