Step 1. Assume your test infrastructure has no bugs.
Step 2. You have infinite time to prove step 1 is false.
Independent analysis of HF/OAI event: https://t.co/pSzAKcOPlw
// I'm annoyed. The industry has spent the past week twisted in knots over defending a "Skynet" style attack. This became evidence of how dangerous AI can be.
It was nothing of the sort. Humans built, configured, maintained a test environment incorrectly and failed to monitor it.
Another attack of anthropomorphization.
We could have made this same mistake with an internet worm in 1995 while testing Exchange mail. In fact the early worms were by and large released by accident while testing/learning.
4/4
As long as Beijing is willing to tolerate extremely rapid rises in debt, GDP growth doesn't tell us much about the health of the economy. What matters is the components of growth and how growth was achieved.
https://t.co/5qO0SyBhLv
Rather than calling them “rare earth minerals” can we just call it “spice”?
And rather than saying we need to diversify our spice supply chains, can we just insist that “the spice must flow”?
Building out capacity (including refining capacity) for rare earths/ other critical minerals should indeed by a real priority now, and the risk of weaponization of this this and other supply chains should have been taken more seriously in the past. But it won't be easy
1/
What China’s potential weaknesses are pretty easy to understand
1. Can China’s system continues to bring out Tech upgrades? Current tech breakthroughs are investments made 10+ years ago.
2. Can government correctly assess the situation if pushed to consider military options.
This is a very important point. And this is why China fundamentally CAN'T export its way to continued rapid growth. It's just too big.
China MUST buy most of what it sells, and that means involution is always going to be a big problem.
The entire 'China Shock' story is badly misunderstood, and usually oversold.
Here are two graphs of manufacturing % of GDP and employment. Both are basically a straight line down after WW2. China entering the WTO in 2001 caused no change in this trend.
In a UN speech today, President Trump said that "all of these [climate] predictions were wrong".
Back in 2019 I led a research effort to digitize old climate model projections and assess how well they did. Turns out they got future warming pretty spot on!
I continue to enjoy @DKThomp's exploration around the social aspects of the new world we've built.
We're a lot richer in many ways but a lot poorer in important ways that deserve attention.
Paper clearly states that the selected sample was exclusively people in the USA. I really think Americans shouldn't extrapolate from their own country to all of humanity.
https://t.co/vl2jx00xsM
@berlinairport ist es möglich das unbegleitete Kinder (14 & 12 Jahre alt) bei Ankunft vom Flughafenpersonal am Gate abgeholt werden, wenn die Airline keinen Begleitservice anbietet?