@RachelCreates I support these scientific sensibilities π
Formalize it a little & trying things can be reframed as hypothesis testing, refining observations into falsifiable predictions
Suddenly failure becomes the very lens sharpening ur focus + increasing output
Laser eyes or GTFO ππͺ
@ATinyGreenCell I use chat harnesses for product design, various info tasks search/sorting/match and drafting spec. Then Codex & Claude harnesses implement, one builds the other tests. Limited context + defined handoffs in repo agent gov doc = auto-orchestration balanced w separation of powers
I've been avoiding using Claude this entire time bc Anthropic might as well have named themselves "Definitely Not Skynet" and I would've at least been disarmed by a little dark humor
It is noticeably faster on some tasks using identical prompts, could be context overhead tho
@ATinyGreenCell Shifted focus lately & built a CRM + alliance gov tool for gamers
Even if AI "eats the world" 100x more than software did ppl will still play games & try to gain an edge via data/coordination. Hypothesis analogous to fitness tech success despite new modes of transpo, robots, etc
@icedcool_eth Invariably this begs the question of can AI actually innovate or will recursive self-improvement plateau at the limits of innovation as a creative activity? It remains to be seen but I don't disagree with the principal observation this logic derives from
@icedcool_eth Actually going even further this creates a new definition for the word singularity. Not just the hand wavy hypothetical physical integration of humans & technology, as if we're becoming the Borg. But a much more functional and imo practical definition
@PaulStrategiesX@AlexHormozi@grok Fuck yeah it is! But I grew up with it being a highly flexible word used almost every fucking sentence by people around me π€· Can be highly empowering def recommend fucking around and finding out sometime ππ
@rathikrishna42@AlexHormozi Other comments put this in perspective that customers & team are (should be) value/goal aligned. So they probably appear to think about your goals only bc it impacts theirs. Still real, just a highly curated audience captured by $ instead of what you're doing to make it for them
How much do you trust yourself? And how willing are you to exhaust every possible option while still accepting you might discover you're wrong.
The real art is separating yourself from the objective and doing whats required. Not what you want/wish was true.
Just, what is.
Your value as a leader is determined by how you handle lose-lose situations.
Where you know you will be criticized no matter which path you choose.
Choose lesser evil.
Take blame.
Give credit.
Repeat.
Thatβs the job.
@AlexHormozi The hard thing about hard things... Is that you can either do them and grow or not do them and wonder what could have been.
Banger π₯π₯