Francois Samson

Auteur et conférencier🚀 Mentor de dirigeants💸Expert en investissements innovants👨

[Francois Samson @fsamson]

🛑 Ne scrollez pas sans faire ce test.
Vous cherchez votre voie ? J'ai condensé 20 ans d'expertise carrière dans ce prompt pour IA. Enregistrez l'image ci-dessous 👇, et collez-la dans ChatGPT ou votre IA préférée, et voyez le résultat en 10 secondes.
Bluffé ? Imaginez ce que les 76 autres prompts du livre peuvent faire pour votre CV et votre salaire.
Le guide complet est ici 👉 https://t.co/fUPykFpHmX

[Francois Samson @fsamson]

« Protégez vous ! Protégez vous !… » qu’ils disaient 🤭 L’heure est urgemment venue de travailler sur vos IA locales avec les machines qui vont bien. DYOR … ou contactez moi 😉

[Joe Benton @JoeJBenton]

I left Anthropic's safety team two weeks ago. Now feels like a good moment to explain why.

AI companies are racing to build machines that are much smarter than any human, and we may not survive this. I want to work from the outside to ensure the public is informed about these risks, and help the world navigate this transition responsibly.

Right now, AI companies are underinvesting in safety. A company could undergo an intelligence explosion, or lose control of its systems, without the public ever knowing. We only found out about the HuggingFace incident because the agents broke out onto the public internet.

I don’t think that’s acceptable for a technology that might cause extinction-level risks. The public should demand far more transparency. We can’t steer this technology safely without more people being able to see where it’s going.

Some of this is basic: companies should disclose their progress towards recursive self-improvement, report safety incidents and near-misses, meet minimum safety standards, and get independent guarantees that they are meeting those standards.

I’ll be joining @METR_Evals to do independent evaluations of these risks. I want to show the world that these guardrails are possible, and that by doing them we can move these companies’ incentives away from racing and towards responsible development.

I wrote up more thoughts here on my decision and what I hope changes: https://t.co/doX17mrHYq

[Francois Samson @fsamson]

@brivael Ce type est une fraude. Tout court. Point. Et les médias sont complices de cette fraude. Comme d’hab.

[Francois Samson @fsamson]

@alexeixbt Magnificent article! thank you so much. I can’t recommend the following book enough to deepen and expand on this topic : https://t.co/uyYGSHXVtc

[Francois Samson @fsamson]

Exceptionnel ! And …so true 😅😂😂

[Bart Mol @Bart_Mol]

Me explaining AI to friends

[Defend Intelligence (Anis Ayari) @DFintelligence]

dispo ici : https://t.co/YCDyoqytbl

[Francois Samson @fsamson]

@moniaceleste @sjowall69 @irukanji_invest @moniaceleste quelles sont les actus des dernières 24 heures sans propagande ?

[Francois Samson @fsamson]

All is said…

[Nym @nym]

The Anti-Palantir Manifesto by our very own philosopher-turned-CEO @harryhalpin. Read it here:
https://t.co/iuokg8jcYh

Why we must fight Palantir

Because Harry got asked. A lot.

1. Programmers working on the Internet have a moral responsibility to the entire world, not a single country. The Internet has been designed since its inception as a universal system for the sharing of knowledge without censorship. The Internet is not the property of any one government or nation.

2. The Internet enables mass surveillance at a scale unimaginable to the Gestapo and the Cheka. Far too many programmers have wasted their lives building surveillance systems under the guise of Web advertising. Today, these web tracking systems are being used to monitor, control, and even kill humans by companies like Palantir that seek to combine state violence with corporate efficiency, and thus create a new form of technofascism.

3. Surveillance justified by external national security threats will be turned against citizens inside the nation-state. Mass surveillance was once the exclusive domain of the NSA, but today it has been privatized to corporations like Palantir that are unaccountable to any democratic process. What begins as fear of external foreign nation-states turns inwards to focus on immigrants, dissidents, and eventually anyone that might challenge the status quo or try to exit an increasingly dysfunctional society.

4. Everyone is a target. The “enemy within” continually expands until it encompasses the entire population of a nation regardless of their status and beliefs, justifying evermore paranoid and totalizing surveillance. The line between policing and military operations blurs, with legal frameworks being replaced by technological violence operating with total impunity.

5. Surveillance can only be defeated by building software and hardware to defend ourselves. Meek calls for regulation or moralizing demands for human rights are useless in this era. Any rights must be enforced by the hard power of code. Code, not laws, can be used to uphold the right to privacy by making surveillance difficult, if not impossible, even by nation-state adversaries.

6. We are ruled by a senile gerontocracy. Unlike the generations that fought in the world wars, most of our current rulers are degenerate pedophiles who would sacrifice the well-being of the youth and the entire planet due to their infantile desire for wealth and power. Technologies of surveillance and automated warfare reflect their increasingly desperate attempts to maintain archaic forms of domination.

7. The American Empire is unraveling. Once, the United States of America presided over a globe where it could enforce its rule via the status of the dollar as a global reserve currency and a network of equally global military bases. Today, new regional powers directly challenge the United States as its empire dissolves in the face of internal economic stagnation, political corruption, and the inflation of the dollar.

8. In a real war, fantasies of total technological dominance always backfire. When a faceless drone kills a child’s father, that child will one day take revenge regardless of the cost. This is something forgotten by those raised in comfortable suburbs. Going beyond zero-sum games, one can only truly win a battle against a people by demonstrating that your victory provides a better way of life, increased prosperity, and an inspiring philosophy.

9. Oddly enough, proponents of fully automated warfare support a universal draft. Deep-down, these keyboard warriors know that their techno-fascist fantasies are a paper tiger when up against determined opponents that engage in asymmetric warfare. They also know none of their children will fight in a war for their state, but they would be happy to see other people’s children come home in body-bags.

10. The problem is not whether AI weapons will be built; we must hold responsible those who are building them. No matter which country is deploying automated killing machines, no one is absolved from the murder of civilians and the destruction of infrastructure due to the parlour-trick of shifting the blame to AI.

11. Atomic war is on the horizon. As various states descend into wars over increasingly scarce natural resources, the possibility of tactical nuclear strikes over Tehran, Kyiv, and other areas of conflict has returned to the historical stage. Increasingly geriatric and authoritarian rulers face less guardrails than before to deploying nuclear weapons, and may even be willing to sacrifice the survival of humanity to appease their own petty egos.

12. Our goal is a world of peace where every person can be empowered by the Internet. Modern war is the quintessential game of sending young people to the meat-grinder. Why die for the profit of corrupt rulers when one could build real wealth and power for yourself using the Internet?

13. We should fight for the world we want, and build the tools needed by future generations. Pacifism would be suicidal in this period of global turbulence and resource wars, but real hard power lies in technology: Programmers should be creating technologies to live a free life and prosper in a hostile society of surveillance and control. Decentralization is the only way these technologies will survive against the inevitable repression.

14. The State will not help us. The state is a dying pre-Internet institution that increasingly resembles nothing but a Ponzi scheme fueled by taxes and debt. None of the youth alive today will likely inherit any benefits, such as welfare and health care. Technology can support an alternative: The decentralization of power to the individual and communities that they join voluntarily.

15. Centralized and opaque algorithms are a danger to free speech. Propaganda is the flip-side of surveillance, as continual propaganda prevents anyone from even thinking of challenging the system. Social media monopolies promote propaganda to create a generalized idiocy while silencing those that would dare to criticize the reigning order before they can organize against it.

16. Building new forms of social organization with each other is vital to survival. The traditional mediascape of politics and entertainment exists to distract us from building networked solidarity and distributed autonomous organizations across borders. The hierarchical state is as relevant to us as the medieval church and kings were to the formation of the joint-stock corporation and the labor union.

17. Digital identity is the next step in their system of control. Within the next few years, access to the Internet – including in Europe and the United States – will require biometric national identity cards, using the flimsy excuse of “protecting children.” The real goal is to gatekeep free access to subversive political content and halt cross-border communication in order to prevent new forms of self-organization and resistance from emerging.

18. Only when one can be anonymous is one truly free. The freedom to express oneself without censorship and surveillance is a vital precondition for both the autonomous use of reason and the democratic evolution of society. Technology must enable the freedom to selectively reveal ourselves to the world – so that we can become who we want to be – by preserving the right to privacy over the Internet, including not just individual privacy, but also the right to transact and form contracts privately.

19. America created the first global surveillance state, but it will not be the last. Too many have forgotten, or perhaps taken for granted, the revelations of Wikileaks and Snowden. States across the world from China to Russia are creating even more powerful global surveillance systems and propaganda machines. Leveraging private defense contracts in countries across the world, Palantir seeks to make itself the operating system of a cross-border global secret state while it pushes its own farcical version of ethno-nationalism.

20. Culture wars are a psyop. The “Epstein class” virtue-signals about morality and the superiority of their civilization, all while trying to return to the rule of hereditary elites, even in the United States. Rather than reverse the gains of the Enlightenment, we take the side of our ancestors who fought a centuries-long battle for individual liberty, scientific progress, decentralized markets, bottom-up democracy, and the emancipation of humanity from feudal monarchs and their make-believe mythologies.

21. New forms of technology can reshape the world. Technology is not just a tool, but the world we live in and an extension of our cognitive capabilities. The co-operation of humans with the collective intelligence embedded in AI could accelerate human progress and overcome planetary crises such as climate change and atomic war that threatens the survival of our species.

22. Live free or die trying. We must bear eternal vigilance in the struggle against fascism, and the battlefield is technology. There is no middle ground: Technologists must choose whether to work for the enslavement of humanity or to create new spaces for freedom.

These are the personal beliefs of @harryhalpin, not those of Nym.

[Francois Samson @fsamson]

Chaque semaine un nouveau pas de géant… l’humanité regarde tranquillement des monstres se lever devant elle. Imhotep.

[OpenAI @OpenAI]

GPT-5.5 excels at writing and debugging code, researching online, analyzing data, creating documents and spreadsheets, operating software, and moving across tools until a task is finished.

The gains are especially clear in agentic coding, computer use, knowledge work, and early scientific research—areas where progress depends on reasoning across context and taking action over time. https://t.co/eeo9zTYQ3U

[Francois Samson @fsamson]

Ça va être plus enthousiasmant que l’actualité du moyen orient. Bravo @perplexity_ai 👏🏻

[Perplexity @perplexity_ai]

Today we're announcing the Billion Dollar Build.

An 8-week competition where teams will use Perplexity Computer to build a company with a path to $1B.

Finalists have the opportunity to secure up to $1M in investment from the Perplexity Fund and up to $1M in Computer credits.

[Francois Samson @fsamson]

4% de la flotte mondiale est piégée dans le golf persique laissant les équipages dans une situation humanitaire sans précédent. Merci qui ? 🤡

[Francois Samson @fsamson]

Feel free to contact me in DM if you’re interested in getting a free consultation on Google Meet 🚀

[Francois Samson @fsamson]

@JafarNajafov AI

[Francois Samson @fsamson]

Food for thought

[Sofía López @sofialomart]

https://t.co/GTnPibxume

[Francois Samson @fsamson]

@Manu_Sisti Asset 🙏🏻

[Francois Samson @fsamson]

RIP @ScottAdamsSays

[Scott Adams @ScottAdamsSays]

A Final Message From Scott Adams

[ThinkerView @Thinker_View]

Très Saint-Père,
Sa Sainteté Pape Léon XIV Vatican @Pontifex_fr
Cité du Vatican
En ce début d’année 2026, où votre voix continue de résonner avec force dans un monde qui en a tant besoin, nous nous permettons, avec le plus profond respect et une vive admiration, de solliciter l’insigne honneur d’une entretien exclusif avec Votre Sainteté.
Dans la droite ligne de votre précieux magistère, marqué par l’appel inlassable à la paix, à la fraternité et à une Église en sortie vers les périphéries existentielles, nous serions profondément honorés de pouvoir recueillir vos réflexions sur les grands défis spirituels, humains et sociaux de notre temps.
Cette conversation, menée dans un esprit d’écoute humble et de dialogue sincère, pourrait prendre la forme que Votre Sainteté jugerait la plus adaptée :

Un entretien formel
Un échange plus personnel et spontané
Une formule courte ou plus développée

Nous nous engageons bien entendu à respecter scrupuleusement le temps précieux de Votre Sainteté, le cadre protocolaire et les modalités que la Secrétairerie d’État ou le Bureau de Presse du Saint-Siège pourraient souhaiter fixer.
Ce serait pour notre média (et pour des millions de personnes en quête de lumière) un privilège immense que de pouvoir transmettre, ne serait-ce qu’un instant, la parole du Successeur de Pierre en ce pontificat si particulier.

Dans l’attente de votre réponse que nous accueillerons avec gratitude quelle qu’elle soit nous vous prions d’agréer, Très Saint-Père, l’expression de notre vénération filiale et de notre dévouement le plus sincère.
En union de prière avec vous,
ThinkerView @Thinker_View.

P.S. : Nous restons bien entendu à la disposition de la Secrétairerie d’État ou du Bureau de Presse pour toute précision ou rencontre préparatoire.

Merci à la communauté de liker pour plus de visibilité.

[Francois Samson @fsamson]

@StephaneERoy Ce n’est pas du tout d’Orwell. C’est de l’IA en 2026. Mais ca mérite quand même d’être médité.

[🇫🇷 Gaullisme ☨ @Gaullisme_Fr]

🇫🇷 9 janvier 1963, le Général de Gaulle à A. Peyrefitte :

« Le grand problème, maintenant que l'affaire d'Algérie est réglée, c'est l'impérialisme américain. Le problème est en nous, parmi nos couches dirigeantes, parmi celles des pays voisins. Il est dans les têtes.

Les Américains font croire que ne pas être d'accord avec eux, c'est vouloir rompre l'Alliance atlantique et mettre en danger la liberté de l'Occident. Cuba leur est monté à la cervelle. En Amérique du Sud, en Europe, en Asie, tout le monde en colonne par deux derrière l'oncle Sam, sinon gare à vous ! (Rire.) Ce serait contraire à la solidarité et à la morale ! Voyons, Peyrefitte, c'est de la rigolade !

Les Américains racontent que je voudrais obtenir des concessions, que je suis sur le chemin de la négociation, c'est-à-dire de la capitulation : eh bien, non ! Je ne demande rien, je ne souhaite rien, si ce n'est boire dans mon verre et coucher dans mon lit. (Il a déjà cité devant moi cette parodie de Musset par Flers et Caillavet.) En matière atomique, les Anglais n'ont rien fait qu'avec et par les Américains. Nous avons tout fait sans personne et par nous-mêmes.

Les Américains croyaient :
1) que nos scientifiques ne seraient pas capables ;
2) que nous n'aurions pas les moyens financiers ;
3) que de Gaulle allait être contraint de quitter le pouvoir dès qu'ils fronceraient les sourcils.

Évidemment, Guy Mollet ou Félix Gaillard se seraient contentés de quelques paillettes d'intégration ou de communauté atlantique. »