Dude in the sauna today told me that Trump is purposefully losing the war with Iran to show China that great powers have difficulty with smaller nations porcupine’ing
He told me Trump is saving us from WW3 and nuclear war, it’s all 4d chess apparently
Many people still confuse Chinese model with Chinese inference:
- A model is like a recipe for a dish—e.g. orange chicken
- Claude keeps its recipe secret, charges the dish $50. You must eat in front of Dario and he will watch you the entire time. You can’t change the ingredients or cook it privately.
- Now China releases a free recipe that tastes just as good. You can use American chicken and cook it in your own kitchen (self-hosting), or have a U.S. cloud like AWS or Nebius cook it and pay $2-5.
- Chinese inference is DoorDashing the finished dish from Beijing. Your order and data go there, and you must eat Beijing chicken. It’s fair to worry about the safety of their ingredients.
- Regulate the kitchen, ingredients, and data. Don’t ban the recipe.
There are no passes between Argentina's centre-backs.
Lisandro Martínez and Cuti Romero don't pass the ball to each other. Take a look at Argentina's passing map.
Argentina build with their centre-backs very wide. England were pressing with their wingers from out to in.
A pass between the centre-backs is the perfect trigger for this type of press, giving the wingers time to step up and apply pressure to the centre-backs while the ball is traveling. Specially when your two centre-backs are wide and quite far from each other.
Instead, Argentina either looked to find the third man inside to find the full-backs free, or recycled possession back to the goalkeeper.
They knew that a pass between the centre-backs would trigger England's press.
This is excellent from Argentina and a great detail from Scaloni.