@dbrand My Ghost case (under a year old) is separating at the bottom like it just got served divorce papers.
Attached: photographic evidence of the betrayal.
Surely your engineering can outlast the extreme sport of existing in a desk-job pocket.
That’s the bar.
Your move.
@polsky_jacob@dalepartridge I'm not necessarily a huge Dale fan, but Deborah was raised as a judge specifically as a punishment to Israel for men refusing to lead. She proves the point.
I have way more tolerance for the Ogden folks than many people probably wish I had. I love a lot of what they say, and still listen to their stuff regularly.
But @Brian_Sauve and @Eric_Conn (who probably won’t see this because they both have blocked me) *refuse* to be clear on this issue (among others).
I’m fine with reading historical speeches.
I’m fine with acknowledging that history was messy, and even that Hitler and the Nazis did or said some good things (and the Allies did/said bad ones).
I’m all for rejecting the up-and-coming globalist holocaust (and if you think “holocaust” is an overstatement, I know 250,000 British girls who would disagree with you).
But saying “we are just gonna tell you what we honestly think” and then proceeding to not tell us what you honestly think about *the particular bones of contention* is really not helpful.
(Look at the recent posts by @Protestia if you want more info on what Antelope Hill puts out.)
To respond to the controversy by saying “They republish historical speeches, history is messy, and yeah we probably should have researched them better-” this does not tell us what you honestly think about the issues in question.
The obvious direction of AHP is not simply the republication of historical speeches. The agenda of AHP is clear.
Imagine if a mainstream Christian conference had some LGBT-affirming publishing house in their vendor hall. The truth comes out during the conference, and conference officials respond with a mild, soft-shoe backpedal. “Yeah, we probably should have researched them better, human sexuality is a complicated thing.”
Everyone on the Christian right (correctly) would say that was fake and gay nonsense at a time when a clear and courageous rebuke was necessary.
Clarity is charity, and it isn’t hard to say “we are cool with historical speeches, but we are not cool with calling blacks subhuman or promoting Nazi paganism and ethnic vainglory. We thought Antelope Hill was just republishing speeches, but have since discovered that they have a clear agenda, and we will not be having them back to our conference. And while history is complicated, Hitler and the Nazis were definitely not heroes, and the large swath of our fans who think that they were need to repent.”
This isn’t “dance, monkey, dance.”
It’s “why will you not be clear about what you believe on this issue?”
“But we have been clear on one of our podcasts 17 months ago!”
OK. Please, for those of us who missed it, sum it up in a tweet.
Shouldn’t be hard.
Tired of all the drama in the reformed space. I just want @Brian_Sauve to finally publicly recognize (and then publicly denounce, because its AI) this beautiful AI song that was created over a year ago.
https://t.co/qi6SkUeHsC
@McJuggerNuggets Sorry "Little Nugget" Mommy and Daddy had you dismembered and skull crushed and sucked out with a vacuum.
They're going to try again for something less flawed.