Mark Keeping ๐ณ๏ธโ๐ ๐จ๐ปโ๐คโ๐จ๐ฝ ๐ท
@gtreading
Used to smash atoms apart and search for fragments. Police box enthusiast. Retweets โ endorsement, any opinions expressed are my own. 48.1%. Personal account
The Met have explained their decision not to take any further action against Zack Polanski, telling me "it would be a complete waste of time you attention seeking twat, now shut the fuck up and fuck the fuck off"
Strangely, this story doesn't mention the 1,077 small boat arrivals in Liz Truss's first week as PM, or the 1,800 in Rishi Sunak's. It also says that there were only 35 arrivals in Boris Johnson's first week as PM in 2019, but omits to mention the 2,532 in his final week in 2022.
โWhatโs that Skippy, youโre the victim of a political smear campaign involving the deep state and are currently under investigation by the Met Police for a donation you gave to a political party?โ
So on Facebook Farage is still claiming to be an MP despite his resignation and despite being in a byelection election period.
Will @ElectoralCommUK or the Speaker take action
Rupert Lowe, 2019: It should be easier for people from India to get a visa to come to the UK
Rupert Lowe, 2026: Why is it so easy for people from India to get a visa to come to the UK?
Ooh good - another excuse to wade in on something I know nothing about in a desperate bid to distract attention from my dodgy finances and humiliating battle with a bin.
BREAKING: Trump's $10 billion BBC lawsuit is BACKFIRING BIGLY and may force Special Prosecutor Jack Smith's January 6 evidence back into the courtroom
After making $16 million from Paramount/CBS to settle one of his frivolous lawsuits, Donald Trump figured he could keep suing media companies and rake in the dough from corporate CEOs who would rather give in than face a protracted and expensive legal fight.
But Trump got greedy and wanted a $10 billion payday from his next target, Britainโs venerable public broadcaster, the BBC.
What he's getting instead is a legal nightmare of his own making.
Trump sued the BBC last December, claiming a documentary on their news program Panorama, "put words in his mouth" by editing together portions of his January 6th speech delivered nearly 50 minutes apart.
He even bizarrely claimed the network used AI to fabricate his words โ it didn't. The BBC did splice the footage, which sparked an internal investigation, the firing of some senior officials at the broadcaster, and the issuing of a written apology.
An apology simply wasn't enough for Trump, however. He still wanted that $10 billion.
Now his lawsuit against the British broadcaster is unraveling spectacularly.
A federal judge ruled this week that Trump must hand over detailed financial records from more than 400 companies tied to his family trust โ because HIS OWN lawsuit claims the BBC's editing damaged his businesses.
You can't claim massive financial injury and then refuse to show your books. Judge Enjoliquรฉ Lett wasn't buying the attempted dodge: "All of President Trump's brand, properties and businesses are impugned... Reputational, economic damages, all of that is now at issue in this case."
It gets worse. The same judge greenlit subpoenas targeting Trump's inner circle โ Donald Trump Jr., Steve Bannon, and Stephen Miller โ to determine what Trump actually intended on January 6th.
And now, in a third gut-punch within 24 hours, the BBC is demanding records showing exactly how Trump LOST his executive privilege claims during Special Prosecutor Jack Smith's January 6th investigation.
Smith's team had already gathered evidence establishing that the Capitol violence was "foreseeable" to Trump, that he "caused it," and that he made "a conscious choice not to stop it" once it began. If the BBC gets that evidence, Trump's entire defamation case collapses.
Trump built a career suing media outlets into silence. This time, he sued an organization willing to actually fight โ and in doing so, handed prosecutors a roadmap straight into his finances, his inner circle, and his own conduct on January 6th.
Plus, the public may get another chance to review the evidence that Jack Smith amassed against Trump, evidence that judges appointed by the litigious president have made sure that heโll never be held accountable for.
Sometimes a lawsuit is simply a trap you built for yourself.
Please like and share to spread the news!
Burnham has been in government for four days.
And Tories who were in government for fourteen years say he isnโt going far enough.
This would be funny if it werenโt so ridiculous.