Tracie Hoops

philosophy grad student. linguistics ma. peirce. pragmaticism. cptsd, adhd. she/they/bi/pan perpetually confused.

[Tracie Hoops @hoops_ta]

@_NatHansen_ @xphilosopher If you had to look it up, you know that a MUD game was a single player text based choices made in dungeons. Multi-user did not mean the same as MMO. It meant every person who reads your article is an individual user. Which is why Frege was an appropriate answer to Gettier.

[Tracie Hoops @hoops_ta]

@_NatHansen_ @xphilosopher If you had to look it up, you know that a MUD game was a single player text based choices made in dungeons. Multi-user did not mean the same as MMO. It meant every person who reads your article is an individual user. Which is why Frege was an appropriate answer to Gettier.

[Tracie Hoops @hoops_ta]

@xphilosopher @_NatHansen_ It couldn't accept that as an answer. I switched to the Gettier problem. I asked how one justifies belief, it said a clock says 3:00 and it gapoens to be 3:00. I said Frege. It responded that gives you sense and reference ehich is different. i closed it then. Frege = approp ans

[Tracie Hoops @hoops_ta]

@xphilosopher @_NatHansen_ My favorite thing to do with AI is break it. This is a terrible technology for many reasons. But I tried it out. My response to the trolley problem is that both choices are exactly the same so I did nothing. It asked me for clarification: do you mean doing nothing or pulling. Yes

[Tracie Hoops @hoops_ta]

@xphilosopher @_NatHansen_ For clarification of my trolley problem answer: the point of these is to get PEOPLE talking. I am sitting there talking to a MUD game. it already killed the point. so there wasn't a lever to pull.

[Tracie Hoops @hoops_ta]

@_NatHansen_ @xphilosopher That still sidesteps the point of getting people to collectively consider ethical conundrums as a counter to Kant's imperative. I prefer the Wittgensteinian pointy stick example as an example of how morals get /created/. Hence, sidestepping the purpose by creating a MUD game.

[Tracie Hoops @hoops_ta]

@_NatHansen_ @xphilosopher That still sidesteps the point of getting people to collectively consider ethical conundrums as a counter to Kant's imperative. I prefer the Wittgensteinian pointy stick example as an example of how morals get /created/. Hence, sidestepping the purpose by creating a MUD game.

[Tracie Hoops @hoops_ta]

@xphilosopher @_NatHansen_ For clarification of my trolley problem answer: the point of these is to get PEOPLE talking. I am sitting there talking to a MUD game. it already killed the point. so there wasn't a lever to pull.

[Tracie Hoops @hoops_ta]

@xphilosopher @_NatHansen_ My favorite thing to do with AI is break it. This is a terrible technology for many reasons. But I tried it out. My response to the trolley problem is that both choices are exactly the same so I did nothing. It asked me for clarification: do you mean doing nothing or pulling. Yes

[Tracie Hoops @hoops_ta]

@xphilosopher @_NatHansen_ It couldn't accept that as an answer. I switched to the Gettier problem. I asked how one justifies belief, it said a clock says 3:00 and it gapoens to be 3:00. I said Frege. It responded that gives you sense and reference ehich is different. i closed it then. Frege = approp ans

[Tracie Hoops @hoops_ta]

@Pinball_Lez @aufgehenderRest the phaneron, the place where all lost socks congregate because you didn't know what socks were yet. the place ai wishes it had access to.

[Tracie Hoops @hoops_ta]

@ikesharpless Today required reading parts of A Nation Betrayed

[Tracie Hoops @hoops_ta]

@ikesharpless Research for something I've been working on for the past 19 months.

[Tracie Hoops @hoops_ta]

@JimDMiller @araujohistorian how is it helping you?

[Tracie Hoops @hoops_ta]

@cyberpyre Language games are emergent initially, they become ritualized fairly quickly - cour proceedings, marriages, etc. Concretization to offload cog demand. Which, I think, non-tri-desecendent LLMs could exploit to great effect. And I am attempting a sly obfuscation there on the name.

[David Sirota @davidsirota]

Destroying the @InternetArchive's @WayBackMachine would be the equivalent of the burning of the Library of Alexandria - one of the worst losses of knowledge in history.

Media giants are now threatening to do this.

We can't let this happen.

Pass it on.

[Tracie Hoops @hoops_ta]

@Artiexus @KarlFristonNews yes you understand what i was saying

[Tracie Hoops @hoops_ta]

@Artiexus @KarlFristonNews My scarecrow comment was also pointing at the "mind cannot face". There is a reason for using that phrase that the authors here are obnoxiously avoiding: not everyone suffering from C/PTSD is a scientist. And you can have C/PTSD and not cognitively be able to trace its origin.