deudle

mouse • remilio fancier ☩ Viva Cristo Rey!

[deudle @iamdeudle]

It would be nice to make it, but someone in this work meeting just said “pass the mustard” to mean “pass muster”, where would I get comedy like this outside of wage slavery

[deudle @iamdeudle]

@NobleBrown Could she maybe sit there and not talk

[deudle @iamdeudle]

@Fair_and_Biased The worst example of this was Les Miserables. Overacting and badly singing in a shouty way and blubbering and gasping at the same time. Just excruciating and embarrassing to watch

[deudle @iamdeudle]

@datzoulou @carterfogarty24 @bschaeffer12 @jmjones Good point

[deudle @iamdeudle]

@stlouispatriot It’s like how mid tier cities fall over themselves to celebrate “pride.” Like ok please make this city seem cool. Be completely naked degenerates it’s fine just lend us some cachet

[deudle @iamdeudle]

If the “fighting words doctrine” is used to ban magic words at which minorities choose to chimp out, then it means said minorities may enact de facto word bans through violence.

[Daniel Concannon @TooWhiteToTweet]

“Fighting Words.”

The malicious prosecution of Shiloh Hendrix hinges on “fighting words doctrine.”

No law was ever passed restricting the First Amendment in cases of “fighting words,” rather, “fighting words doctrine” was established as case law by the Supreme court in Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire in 1942, stripping First Amendment protection when words "by their very utterance inflict injury or tend to incite an immediate breach of the peace."

While the Supreme Court has never reversed the Chaplinksy decision, it has greatly narrowed its application in numerous subsequent decisions - to the point where convictions based on “fighting words” are exceedingly rare.

This, of course, didn't stop Rochester's city attorneys from pursuing a self-evidently innocent White mother on these grounds, regardless of how ridiculous the charges are on their face.

Applying “fighting words doctrine” to the full circumstances of the Shiloh Hendrix incident reveals how impossibly far-fetched the charges truly are. Hendrix herself is the party who was incited. She didn't say anything to anyone until the Somali child/thief stole from her. That's the moment the adult Somali sex pest began filming and haranguing her. The Somali sex pest himself says the word “nigger” five times during the one-minute video. Shiloh Hendrix says the word “nigger” to the Somali sex pest AFTER THE SOMALI SEX PEST DEMANDS SHE SAYS THE WORD.

Understand that the first charge of “disorderly conduct” is specifically for uttering “nigger” at the Somali child/thief, and the second is specifically for uttering it at the adult Somali sex pest who asked her to say it. What I've described above are the actual, verified circumstances in which she made those utterances. She was physically in retreat from the Somali sex pest as he continuously pursued her, demanding she say “nigger” while he continuously said it himself. It's on video.

That the charges were ever brought... that the case is currently in court... it's utter insanity. But the prosecutors resurrected this legal dead horse believing that they can use it to convince a jury to cast aside the First Amendment and convict an innocent White mother for uttering words.

And they may be right. Remember, the barefaced insanity of it all doesn't mean that there won't be a conviction. We're living in anti-White anarcho-tyranny, where tenets of “White Supremacy™” like truth, evidence, reason, and logic carry no weight. If “fighting words doctrine” was applied evenly across society, the majority of human beings would be convicted for saying words. What's happening to Shiloh Hendrix lays bare the selective anti-White nature of the “justice” system.

Even if she's found not guilty, the system has already punished her through this entire sham of a “legal” process.

In a world where we should be relentlessly trying prosecutors and judges, we're instead watching those very government criminals do everything in their power to destroy White people's lives - right down to a White mother in Minnesota who simply took her toddler to the park to play, not realizing she was stepping into Playground Mogadishu, where sub-Saharan-tier lawlessness is backed by the full support of Rochester, Minnesota's prosecutors.

If convicted, Shiloh's course of justice would run through the Minnesota Court of Appeals. If she loses there, she'd have to appeal further to the Minnesota Supreme Court. And if she loses there, or they refuse to hear it, the only remaining option is the US Supreme Court, which grants less than 1% of petitions.

Shiloh Hendrix is not the first to suffer from these anti-White conditions, and she's far from the last. Whites are the only group in America with effectively zero racial organization. Which is why it's so easy for the system to target us. Our percent of the population is in freefall, and our outright numbers have been in decline for over a decade. These conditions will only worsen until we first organize, and then force them to improve.

[deudle @iamdeudle]

@theredbird_way @theredbird_way2 Demote to AA??

[deudle @iamdeudle]

So @claude is clearly trying to box out @figma with Claude Design which offers zero integration with Figma. @ChatGPTapp has a great opportunity to be the ai design tool that fully embraces and integrates with Figma

[deudle @iamdeudle]

Isn’t it inspiring when people can find common ground

[deudle @iamdeudle]

@zelinarxy well I'll be darned

[deudle @iamdeudle]

LET'S GOOOOOOOOO

[Alex Toussaint @alextoussss]

Extremely excited to announce our first air-to-air kill of a flying moth by an autonomous micro-drone. This is a big step towards completely eradicating mosquitoes.

[deudle @iamdeudle]

@AugieNash I like the one where it was a lady who shouted "It's rigged! I demand a recount!"

[deudle @iamdeudle]

@kvo2021 @Bernstein In humans this is called Burning Man

[deudle @iamdeudle]

@nic_carter My favorite sports podcasts are all sponsored by gambling companies and it’s creepy

[deudle @iamdeudle]

@zelinarxy But how inconvenient if your monthly musth happens to coincide with your lady’s monthly thing

[deudle @iamdeudle]

@zelinarxy In a sane world, the fact that an illegal requires gazillions of $ of Medicaid on an ongoing basis would be recognized as a reason to deport him immediately, not to keep him here forever

[deudle @iamdeudle]

I suppose if boxed out of DC-based AI, one could imagine a campaign setting up openclaw on a Mac mini to write their website content and draft fundraising email etc. Fun times!

[deudle @iamdeudle]

Love this idea. A maximalist version would keep campaigns from using any cloud storage or SaaS using AWS, Azure etc — basically impossible. Yet even a more restrained pledge to specifically avoid AI would, I believe, be intolerably painful for any such organization days.

[Steven Sinofsky @stevesi]

Anyone who comes out against building data centers should take a pledge vowing not to use any datacenter-based services for campaigning, communicating with/helping constituents, or operating their office. And if the party of no DC wins, then no datacenters for Congress.

[deudle @iamdeudle]

@shoe0nhead I would like to be friends with him

[deudle @iamdeudle]

@zelinarxy But saar b-school say offshoring lead to big profit

Please saar

[deudle @iamdeudle]

Am I crazy? Loud music till midnight is obnoxious even if you warn your neighbors with a winsome note. Call the cops on these a-holes!

Like “howdy neighbor, I’m stealing your ability to go sleep until midnight at the earliest! Peace!” Up yours, mate

[Fletcher of Saltoun @drunkpopinjay]

The Kids are Alright.
(Left on my door this morning).