• Study hard.
• What others think of you is none of your business.
• It's OK not to have all the answers.
• Experiment, Fail, Learn and Repeat.
• Knowledge comes from experience.
• Imagination is important.
• Do what interests you the most.
• Stay curious.
Dario is when an academic gets to the position he’s in. He’s a data point of one in that regard and he fundamentally is not comfortable with making decisions of this scope so he is asking for help/collaboration/committee. And he’s objectively a bad communicator, even most academics are more prepared for giving a 10 min talk at a national conference than he is speaking with 60 minutes.
Comments like this should be sufficiently disqualifying. Dario talking about ‘people and their elected officials’ having a say in ai safety (aka regulating) cracked me up. Anyone who has watched 30 min of CSPAN, even YouTube 🩳 version, on anything related to tech knows these folks in both chambers have near zero agency on the subject, sadly many don't even engage with the tech as personal consumers.
@RBReich There are basically 5 ways to accumulate a billion dollars (that fit my narrative pretty nicely). Professor you’ve become an ideology whore. Being disingenuous to make a buck.
The US federal budget is $7 trillion.
There are 535 in the Senate and Congress.
They collectively allocate that money.
Specifically: 7000/535 = 13 billion per official.
Which means AOC is a political billionaire.
She allocates far more than any market billionaire.
Indeed she allocates ten billion liquid, per year.
A market billionaire has one billion, illiquid, per life.
So: AOC spends 10-100X what a market billionaire has.
It's not even close.
She's right about one thing, though.
AOC didn't earn the tens of billions she spends.
The state taxed that money, by force.
Hey @claudeai , small but annoying TTS bug in the iOS app 🐛
I use Claude on walks to brainstorm; hit play to listen to replies instead of walking and reading. Love it.
The voice reads “/” as “divided by” instead of “slash.” I think the fix is treating “/” as a word separator in TTS context rather than a math operator.
cc @_catwu
@ThePrimeagen Sorry but what you are feeling is not real, I heard a ceo saying this and he was sounding like a thought-leader. Less deeply thinking more letting the agent enjoy the process.
@BrandiKruse Respectfully I’d like to see some reporting (snd studies honestly) to understand why people would vote in numbers for such a stupid person. Until we really understand this we cannot change it.
@dhh David I read this and immediately thought of this blooper from Awakenings. “Expensive, shmensive, let’s go with it. It’s an idea before its time.” 😂
https://t.co/MitwQPUkWF
This comment is more for traditional companies (think manufacturing and upstream Semi, where I have experience). Having internal Al builders (with domain knowledge and technical chops) teach and show folks how to build simple tools to do small jobs better. I served in that role myself last year. 2 of us (in a division of 40) AI-pilled 10 people in 3 weeks and mind you these are senior scientists/managers (no coding experience whatsoever; just Excel). The trick is to reduce/eliminate what I call “set up barrier” (the steps you need to set up a tool or a set of tools that would then unblock you to get the benefits). IT/enterprise Tech teams are unfortunately ineffective. Not relying on them would be another step in the right direction.