sorry buddy. I know your child is dying of cancer and there’s nothing technically stopping you from spending 100k to make an n=1 experimental vaccine to give him more time but have you thought about safety and efficacy and the ramifications on the healthcare system if everyone were to take matters into their own hands
אבל מהפטנטים שהגישה עולה שהיא פיתחה *מכשיר דמוי אוזניות שמאפשר לפענח דיבור של אדם בלי שאמר זאת בקול*. כן כן. המכשיר עושה זאת באמצעות זיהוי שינויים זעירים בתנועות עור הפנים כדי להסיק אילו מילים המשתמש מתכוון לומר, אפילו בלי שהן נשמעות בפועל.
לפי סכום הרכישה, כנראה שזה עובד >>
Why AGI Won't Replace You (It'll Make You Essential)
Everyone 'knows' that AGI will make humans economically worthless. Yale economist just published a paper proving our wages will stagnate and we'll become "economically negligible."
Except it's completely backwards.
Here's why AGI makes humans MORE essential, not less...
Think about money for a second. What is it actually?
It's humanity's most successful compression algorithm. We take all the complex things we value - beauty, status, connection, meaning - and squash them into a single number: price.
A brutal simplification, but necessary. Our brains couldn't handle anything more complex.
But that's not the interesting part...
What happens when everyone has an AI that can track value in hundreds of dimensions simultaneously?
Not just "this bread costs £3" but "this bread means communion for Alice, survival for Bob, and protest ammunition for Charlie" (yes, really).
Suddenly money becomes... obsolete?
Wait, let me show you something wild.
You know that moment when your neighbour's leaf blower wakes your baby? Currently your options are:
* Suffer in silence
* Awkward confrontation
* Move house
But imagine if your AI agent could instantly negotiate with theirs...
Your agent knows you'd pay £50 for quiet during naptime on weekdays but not weekends. Their agent knows they'd happily shift their gardening schedule for help with their Wi-Fi.
Milliseconds later: deal struck. No money needed. Just pure value exchange.
(Getting interesting now, innit?)
Here's where economists get it wrong: They think AGI replaces human work.
But watch what actually happens:
Therapist? Not replaced by AI providing "therapy services." You want connection with another consciousness that's actually suffered and grown.
That's irreplaceable. Not because compute is expensive, but because consciousness isn't computable.
Think about your favourite teacher. Were they valuable because they transferred information efficiently?
No. They modeled what it means to be a curious, growing mind. They showed you how to think, not what to think.
An AI can't do that. It can simulate it, but that's like saying a photograph can replace a sunset.
"But wait," you might say, "if AI knows all my preferences, what do they need me for?"
Here's the kicker: Your preferences aren't fixed data points. They EVOLVE through living.
Your taste for Thai food isn't just a database entry - it's tied to memories with your grandmother, shifted by that documentary on sustainable farming, evolved through conversations with friends.
Every choice you make creates new values that ripple through the network. You're not just a preference-haver.
You're a preference-creator.
And that changes everything.
Let me paint you a picture of work in the AGI economy:
Software engineer? Becomes a preference architect - bridging human meaning and machine capability.
Farmer? Becomes an agricultural experience designer - creating relationships between people and food.
Artist? Becomes central to the economy. When material needs are solved, meaning-creation IS the economy.
None of these are "replaced." They're transformed.
Even better: Remember Restrepo's "compute-equivalent units" - measuring human value by how much compute it takes to replace you?
That's like measuring a painting's value by how much paint it uses.
Completely misses the point.
In the consciousness economy, you're valued for:
* Authentic relationships only you can form
* Unique perspectives only you can offer
* Experiences only you can have
* Meanings only you can create
The compute serves this. Not the other way around.
Now here's something that'll bake your noodle:
An economy where humans "won't be missed" isn't an economy at all.
It's just machines moving resources around. Purposeless motion.
The moment you remove human consciousness - with its preferences, relationships, meanings - the entire thing becomes pointless.
GDP without humans to enjoy it? That's not wealth. That's waste.
So what does this mean for you?
Next time someone says AI will make you obsolete, ask them: "Obsolete to whom?"
If there's no human consciousness to value things, there's no economy. Just computation.
You ARE the economy. AI just helps you express it better.
Here's what to watch for:
* Services becoming more personalized (AI matching your exact preferences)
* Work shifting from production to meaning-creation
* Value becoming multi-dimensional (not just price)
* Relationships becoming MORE important, not less
Try this thought experiment:
What would you do if material scarcity ended tomorrow? If AI could produce anything?
Whatever your answer - THAT'S your future work. That's what becomes valuable when production is solved.
(Spoiler: It's probably not "nothing")
The real challenge isn't economic irrelevance.
It's developmental speed.
Can human consciousness evolve fast enough to wisely guide the AI systems we're creating?
Can we handle multi-dimensional value instead of simple prices?
Can we maintain meaning when machines satisfy our every preference?
These are hard questions. But they're completely different from "will humans have value?"
The question isn't WHETHER you'll matter in an AGI world.
It's whether you'll evolve fast enough to handle how much you'll matter.
Makes you wonder what else we're getting backwards about AI, doesn't it?
What other "obvious" problems are actually opportunities in disguise?
The future isn't about humans versus machines competing for relevance.
It's about consciousness and computation dancing together, creating forms of value we can barely imagine.
And in that dance? You're not the one being replaced.
You're the one calling the tune.
English Wikipedia is eradicating free thought.
Today, it decided to delete the Destruction of Israel in Iranian policy page, merging it into Iran-Israel relations! 😱🚫
The platform's bias is screaming out loud.
We can no longer ignore it! 😡🔥
#TruthMatters
סיפור גבורתו של הלוחם הגיבור סבסטיאן איון!סבסטיאן חלה בסרטן והחלים.
למרות מחלתו ולמרות גילו, סבסטיאן בן ה51 התעקש לעשות מילואים.
לפני שנה בדיוק סבסטיאן הגיבור נפל בעזה.
שתפו לזכרו של סבסטיאן איון גיבור ישראל!!
לכל מי שמבקר באתר ההנצחה ל״נובה״ ברעים.
הקמתי פינת זיכרון בנקודה שבה בתי אלה נורתה.
אודה לכם אם תשקו עם בקבוק מים קטן את הצמחיה ובפרט את עץ האלה שניטע במקום.
בתוך קופסת עץ הנחתי מחברת אם תרצו לכתוב משהו.
(סמוך ישנו ברז מים).
אני יודע שכבר לילה, אבל רק עכשיו סיימתי להכין את המפה ואני מקווה שהיא תהיה לכם שימושית מחר בבוקר
סימנתי בקו עבה את הקטעים שבהם האוטובוסים יפעלו בתדירות גבוהה כל היום
בצפון ירושלים
אני ממליץ לכם לעלות על כל אוטובוס שנוסע (למעט הקווים שמספרם מתחיל ב-500 – כולם נוסעים לשכונות אחרות) ולעבור לגבעת התחמושת או לגבעת המבתר. משם תוכלו להמשיך באוטובוס לכל אזור אחר בירושלים בלי המתנה ארוכה
במרכז
השתמשו בקווים הזמניים 500–503
במערב ירושלים
קווים 20–27 יוארכו עד התחנה המרכזית
אין לי כבר כוח להסביר הכול בפירוט. אני מקווה שהמפות יצאו ברורות. פשוט היה לי מעט מאוד זמן להתכונן לאירוע כל כך חשוב
Not enough is said about the Palestinian Authority’s Pay-for-Slay program. Hamas and the PIJ and other factions recruit terrorists to murder Jews, and the families of those terrorists are paid enormous monthly salaries for life using the billions in international aid they receive.
This chart gives you an idea of how much.
In effect, the world is paying the Palestinian Authority to pay the families of the people who kill Jews. Every country knows this yet still gives them billions in aid. They are all complicit in the slaughter of Jews. And this is the same PA that the world wants to place to govern the Gazans.
I cannot hate these Islamists and all there collaborators enough.