The plane was seconds from hitting the ground so I fought impossible g-forces, broke into the cabin, tackled an armed man, tied him up with headphones, and remembered what I'd learned from Air Craft Investigation to fly the plane. If you don't believe this, you're an antisemite.
The “hijacker’s name is Hammam Al-Hammami” (Bathroom al Bathroom). And the flight was rescued by a Plumber? Seriously? What kind of toilet humour is this? @MoatsTV@ZGallow8y
JUST IN: 🇮🇱 🇦🇪 The Omani pilot in FlyDubai “hijacking” was actually BANNED from flying.
He was banned due to having “radical views”
He was specifically hired and placed on the UAE to Israel flight.
This has to be of the worst false flags I’ve ever seen 🤦🏻♂️
False and fake. Gyanesh is a nobody. His master puppeteers are the enemies of this nation. But this stooge cannot name them as they are his masters too. Hence this steam release game. Don't fall for the CJP scam, dear Gen Z. They'll destroy your genuine anger.
Prediction
The CJP will jump into the electoral fray in 2029. They will find the money and people to contest on many seats round the country. They will NOT join I.N D.I.A. even if their stated goal is to defeat the BJP. They will attack both BJP and INDIA. BJP will win again.
Much respect to @mehartweets, @rantrums_ & Congress Women members who bravely fought off goons on the streets of Delhi.
The world knows how unsafe the streets of the national capital are - now they can see why.
All the drones / police / busses / detention are used to save the pet dogs of the Govt - while rapists, looters & molesters roam freely.
This is the aftermath photos inside of the plane Singapore Airlines Flight SQ321 on May 21, 2024 which suffered turbulence & dropped 178 feet (about 54 meters) in 4.6 seconds. Air Canada Boeing 787-9 experienced severe turbulence at 36000 feet. That’s how it supposed to look
I've been writing about controlled dissent from the very outset of CJP, and today their laundry is out for the world to witness.
In a tyrannical democracy (the illusion of it), the state needs some sort of dissent to thrive, not full-blown dissent but controlled dissent, because when dissent is also controlled, there isn't anything or anyone to dethrone the state. Controlled dissent can be spotted by how the state reacts to it. In a tyrannical democracy, the state will curb dissent through its state machinery, as it did with the protests of Congress or even with the likes of Neha Bora. The protesters will be arrested, will be subjected to violence and will also be abused; that's when you understand the state is threatened. Rahul Gandhi was arrested and was made to bleed within an hour of his protest outside the PM's residence. Neha Bora was arrested and assaulted. You know who hasn't been arrested or even faced the slightest of the state's wrath? The so-called Messiahs.
Protests against the state vs individual:
Issues like SIR or even the paper leaks are not associated with an individual but with a whole system that's controlled by masters. Protests against the state don't pin it on individuals but on the state machinery itself, as RG did in his press conference about the Indian Express expose of SIR. Meanwhile, the controlled dissenters will pin it on a specific individual. The idea is to give the populace one villain—who is not the master but the pawn—so when the controlled dissenters pin the pawn as the primary enemy, the masters can get away with it easily while also giving a sense of achievement to the larger populace when the pawn is removed.
In simple terms, the status quo is maintained with a sacrificial lamb. The pattern is more than evident in paper leaks too. Ask yourself a simple question: Have the paper leaks been completely neutralized? Have the exams become clean as a whistle? The answer to both questions is a big "No", but the majority don't talk about it anymore except for RG's Chhatron Ki Goonj. Dharmendra Pradhan's resignation has given a sense of achievement to the populace while the status quo is preserved, all because the controlled dissenters pinned it on an individual and not the state itself. Now, the controlled dissenters are pinning it on Gyanesh Kumar. Tomorrow, he might resign, but would the problem of vote theft be solved? Absolutely not, but the controlled dissenters will celebrate it as a victory and derail the whole movement—that's the plot.
Gyanesh must go; there's no question about it, but the dissent doesn't end there. SIR needs to be reversed, and judicial reviews of SIR applicants should be fast-tracked. Of all these three, which one do you think would hurt the state less or doesn't hurt the state at all?
In a democracy, anyone can protest, anyone can dissent against the regime or even should dissent against the regime but beware of those who end up helping the state in the name of dissent because that derails the democracy itself.
Bonus: Look out for how conveniently Modi or Amit Shah's name is not being mentioned at all.
Hey @Grok
On a scale from 0 to 10, where 0 means ENTIRELY IMPOSSIBLE and 10 means HIGHLY LIKELY, how probable is it that a plumber with NO FLIGHT TRAINING could reach the cockpit of a plane while it's diving 14,000 feet in 30 seconds, grab the controls, and level the aircraft as the rudder breaks off?
Start with the number.
Base your answer only on what I gave you. No spin.
People who still think these clowns are part of Opposition are completely incapable of deep thinking beyond the farce.
Only a handful of seculars have understood the real game of BJP in creating a controlled Opposition through AAP-CJP.
Here is why we now know the Flydubai story must be false.
When the plane nosedived, it reached a speed of 688 mph and it’s just not designed to handle those G-forces. It should’ve fallen apart from the extreme stresses of plummeting nearly 14,300 feet in 37 seconds (about ten times the normal descent rate). That’s the opinion of an expert on CNN as well as other former pilots. Flight simulations back this claim up.
Commercial pilot and flight instructor Aaron Murphy told CNN: “Some of the numbers that we’re seeing from the reporting initially don’t make sense to me. If you’re descending that rapidly, the aircraft would have disintegrated completely.”
Even if the plane didn’t fall apart, people should’ve been flung around and loose items should’ve been scattered everywhere. We’d expect to see broken bones and even fatalities. Yet we did not see serious injuries (apart from the stabbed pilot) and the place was so tidy, even cups of water were still standing. How is this possible?
We have footage from the dive because multiple passengers whipped out their cameras to film people screaming, but none of it shows the chaos you’d expect. Also, a little girl was in the bathroom at the time. She should’ve been flung into the walls and ceiling, but there was not a scratch on her.
We’re told that the passengers walked to the cockpit during the descent. This would appear to be physically impossible. Imagine the G-forces on a rollercoaster. Now imagine it’s travelling hundreds of miles an hour. Passengers would either be floating around at that speed, or more likely thrown to the back of the plane.
The plane plummeted hard over a period of about 30 seconds. Another 30 seconds and it would’ve hit the ground, but it would’ve taken less than 30 seconds to reach an unsurvivable altitude. Lower altitudes put more stress on the plane, meaning we are talking about seconds to spare.
We are told the plane kept diving and stabilising over several minutes—the cockpit was entered after the hardest dive, but while the plane was still diving. This suggests the hijacker chose to stop diving so hard when the pilot was subdued, enabling the passengers to enter. That’s awfully kind of him, but any kind of dive should’ve made entry difficult-to-impossible.
Here’s a crucial piece of info: the man who first broke into the cockpit and tackled the hijacker was also the man who took control of the plane. He did all of this with literally seconds to spare. It gets even more impressive when you realise he knew that flight controls are inverted. Good job he watched that Air Crash TV show. Good job that two off-duty pilots were ready to take over.
Our hero met Netanyahu hours later, still wearing his bloodied clothes—only images from the plane show his shoes were different. If he changed his shoes, why didn’t he change the rest of his clothes?
He showed that his socks were soaked in blood, but he was wearing his shoes on the plane and they were not soaked in blood. He wasn’t injured so the implication is this was the pilot’s blood. Why didn’t he remove his blood-soaked socks when he changed his shoes?
He told Netanyahu that he got the hijacker in a chokehold while he was trying to destroy instruments. Why was he doing that if he was flying the plane into the ground? Nothing about the story makes sense. Was the captain attacked with a knife or axe? Did passengers break down the cockpit door, or did the injured pilot open it after being stabbed? The details keep shifting.
Now consider that Netanyahu predicted a major event would happen the day before, and he politicised the attack immediately after. Trump is now saying that if it was Iran, we will hit them hard. This is working out awfully well for Netanyahu, isn’t it?
@EBL2017 Dude, for a so-called analyst, you are a class A dunce when it comes to analysing transfers. Chelsea were able to hold on despite their spends because they were always selling their best assets. They are the best selling team in the business.