Excited to share my work now published in @NatureBiotech, with @MananRajith, Idris Raji, Dan Anderson, and many others: AI and lipid nanoparticles are two great tastes that taste great together!
https://t.co/InQPhsEnlZ
@norvid_studies@eryney_ok No idea, I live in Cleveland now was previously in Kendall Square. Maybe Newton? Boston area has a big commute/traffic component to suburb choice unfortunately.
@eryney_ok@norvid_studies I hope not! I live in the most boring (complimentary) suburb possible and my goal is to live a maximally boring life outside of curing all the diseases, my aspiration is to someday have more time to lie in my hammock and read
@norvid_studies@eryney_ok Fun place to take kids! Playground, merry-go-round, ice rink in winter, swan boat in non-winter, often a balloon twister guy, grass to run around in. Frequent random events. Shakespeare on the Common was fun back when i didn't have kids bedtimes to contend with
@WestCoastPhilo@SashaGusevPosts@calicodusty Cynical and possibly inaccurate belief about differences is norms from field to field is philosophy is just generally more rigorous?
@WestCoastPhilo@SashaGusevPosts@calicodusty Yeah makes sense. Philosophy methods section would be pretty funny though all papers should have one, "Thoughts were produced by sitting in a chair (Ikea) and drinking coffee (Starbucks)..."
@WestCoastPhilo@SashaGusevPosts@calicodusty Hmmm I don't know that philosophy has something similar to a methods section which is maximally dry details "We cloned our gene into the IVT vector using Golden Gate cloning then performed in vitro transcription (NEB T7 Polymerase) using CleanCap (Trilink)..."
@WestCoastPhilo@SashaGusevPosts@calicodusty Yes! In journals I've submitted to, it's explicitly prohibited to just say "we did X as described previously(cite)" and also explicitly prohibited to copy the methods!
@SashaGusevPosts@calicodusty Yeah prohibiting self-plagiarism for Methods is so bad! Nothing more annoying than having to figure out exactly which wording changes on a previously published, perfectly good Methods section make it "not self-plagiarism" while minimally sabotaging clarity
@Bluebearmonkey@teortaxesTex One of the best things about the US, maybe the most important driver of our success, is we attract the most talented people from all over the world, thanks for noticing
@teortaxesTex@Bluebearmonkey scoreboard
Anyway I wish the wealth of America on China but not the pathologies, and I wish becoming less of an angry jerk on you in particular, have a nice day
@Bluebearmonkey@teortaxesTex To the extent that continued flip flop making is not due to manufacturing prowess but to artificially holding down the Yuan + state-backed loans and subsidies, I think that's bad!
Very unclear the balance of those factors
@Bluebearmonkey@teortaxesTex I'm unsure if you're attributing that belief to me but to the extent that free market is leading China to continue making flip flops there is no criticism to make
@teortaxesTex@Bluebearmonkey I predict that conditional on no ASI, the time will come when it makes economic sense for all of China to drop nitrile manufacturing capacity, but that time is probably decades away
@frontiernovasw@phl43 Well in the ideal case China would have developed like Taiwan (or South Korea or Poland or the Baltics or...), but in practice it developed pretty well so it would not be close to worth the risk to re-roll the die. This is why interventionism is appealing but usually bad
@teortaxesTex@Bluebearmonkey This is of course a pro-China take, it's what should happen given successful industrialization. Failure would be the government forcing Shenzhen to keep making latex or whatever
@teortaxesTex@Bluebearmonkey As it happens I am mostly correct and this pretty solid dunk is wrong, Shenzhen has outsourced the low-cost commodity manufacturing aspect: