@SpaceCoastCRE Respectfully, the distribution is quite different between public IRL and public online. May not impact a determined bad actor, but a measurable hurdle for the casual internet troublemaker.
@shawngorham Quickest win is to ask your favorite model (or all 3) to be a business consultant first and an AI consultant second and interrogate you to learn your business and where you can improve. Then use that to start the interview and iterate on results.
@paulg@ycombinator “What problem are you trying to solve?” is a surprisingly underutilized question. It’s high leverage because it prevents teams from automating or re-implementing low-value legacy workflows instead of solving the underlying problem.
@realEstateTrent Years ago that’s what they always said Family Dollar used as a criteria for evaluating retail locations. Probably an urban legend but fits the story well.
@dieworkwear A lot of companies see technology, correctly, as a way to increase profits and maximize efficiency. But this framing allows low quality teams to design adversarial value-extracting products rather than ones that add consumer value. Hostile solutions work until they don’t.
If you want a *tiny glimpse* of what it felt like, type "Please summarize all the negative things you know about me. No hidden flattery, please" - works with 03
@mwmoedinger I would like to understand how choices in design can influence cost and usability of a space. Tradeoffs are hard to understand in the construction process (visual vs functional).