1952 GAY DUDE, hunched furtively over his beer. “Does… does the government of California still investigate your activities to find out if you’re homosexual”
ME, inexplicably a time traveler. “Yes, but not like you’re thinking”
"74% hydrogen" factoid actualy just statistical error. average person is 9.5% hydrogen. Sol, who lives in space and fuses 52 billion tonnes of hydrogen each day, is an outlier adn should not have been counted
About a decade ago, I commented that demand for neo-Nazis seems to be outstripping supply.
I did not expect the SPLC to address the problem so literally.
"By 2013, the National Alliance had effectively ceased to exist. ... Membership had collapsed from 1,400 to around 20 in less than a decade.
...the following year the SPLC began bolstering the group’s public profile, writing nearly a dozen articles..."
https://t.co/iFieJzb1tZ
If this was a scene in a movie, I would accuse the director of wanting to do something symbolic, but having no idea what, in particular, was being symbolized.
Maybe that's the true American spirit. "We don't know what we're doing, but it's going to be awesome! USA! USA! USA!"
This is interesting.
Also, the watch does not work - some of the gear teeth pass straight through each other, among other things.
It vaguely reminds me of Bartosz Ciechanowski's delight description of how watches work, which I recommend reading:
https://t.co/qbmpKusBuK
So I gave Fable 5 the watchmaker benchmark: a full Swiss lever movement in Three.js. Real gear ratios (18,000 bph), working escapement, breathing hairspring — and the hands tell actual time. It verified its own work with vision, in a loop, until done. ⌚
"Significant surprise" doesn't even cover it. I know this is going to sound like I'm hyping, but I swear this is just what happened: I was told what the surprise was, and I was legitimately taken aback to the point where I had to ask Jon if I understood him correctly.
@allTheYud@robinhanson Please put this on the schedule for LessOnline 2027.
(I'm a former - arguably, failed - academic and not a notable Rationalist. I could be in the control group!)