Saved by Jesus' death on the cross, USAF E-8(ret), Former Fantasy Football Fan, DittoHead We should not be entertained by something that Jesus died for.
@RepKimSchrier The actions during Covid by the medical community has caused more people to start looking at actual data. This has led to more people making their own informed decision.
Pharma can’t have that, can they.
If you want your nation in free fall. - vote Democrat
If you want managed decline - vote Republican.
They are both taking you to the same place at different speeds.
The year is 1949.
The Nobel Prize in Medicine has just gone to the man who invented the lobotomy. Your doctor suggests one for your sister, who has not been herself since the baby came. It is the most celebrated advance in psychiatry of the age, and he is simply current. By the time the prize curdles into an embarrassment, close to twenty thousand Americans have had the operation, and proportionally more here in Britain.
The year is 1956.
Lay the baby down on his front, the doctor says. So does the most trusted childcare book ever written, the one on every new mother's shelf. On his back he might choke, the reasoning goes. Millions obey. The advice holds for nearly thirty years, long after the evidence has quietly turned, and a generation of cot deaths is counted before anyone thinks to roll the babies over.
The year is 1966.
A bestselling book informs your wife that menopause is a disease, that she is, in the author's word, a castrate, and that a small daily pill will keep her youthful and tolerable to live with. Her doctor agrees. The drug becomes one of the most prescribed in the country. Nobody mentions that the author sat on the payroll of the company that made it. That detail surfaces decades later, in the same year the landmark trial is halted early for raising rates of breast cancer, stroke and clots.
The year is 1979.
Your ulcer is caused by stress and sharp food, the doctor explains. Calm down, drink milk, take the antacid that happens to be the best-selling medicine on earth. Two Australians are about to prove that most ulcers are caused by a bacterium and cured by a fortnight of antibiotics. The profession laughs. One of them eventually drinks a beaker of the stuff to settle the matter. The establishment takes the better part of twenty years to stop laughing. The Nobel lands in 2005.
The year is 1985.
Butter is dangerous, the doctor says. Switch to margarine, it is modern, it is heart-healthy, the experts are united. The spread he nudges you toward is loaded with trans fats, which the next decade will identify as the genuinely dangerous one, and which will eventually be banned outright. The butter goes quietly back in the fridge. No correction is ever printed at the volume of the original warning.
The year is 1992.
There is a pyramid on the surgery wall, and the very same one in your grandchild's classroom. Bread, cereal, rice and pasta form the broad virtuous base, up to eleven servings a day. Fat is exiled to the tiny tip. The chart was reportedly held back a year while the relevant industries had their say. It is wrong at the bottom and wrong at the top.
Now it is today.
Your doctor has new guidelines, new studies, a fresh consensus, delivered with precisely the steady confidence of every guideline above. He believes it, and he has good reason to. So did every doctor in this thread. None of them were villains. Each was sincere, most were kind, and all were certain, reading from a map that somebody else had drawn and handed them. That is the part worth sitting with.
So when the man in the white coat tells you what to eat, what to fear, and what to swallow every morning for the rest of your life, you are allowed to ask. Who paid for the study. What the evidence says beneath the headline. What he was just as certain about thirty years ago, and where that advice sits now.
Then make up your own mind. Call it scepticism, or call it whatever your grandmother called it when she ignored the advert, kept the butter where it was, and lived to ninety-one.
It has outlasted every consensus on this list. It will outlast this one too.
@MaryBowdenMD Pretty obvious he has been forced to stay away from “vaccines”. He’s trying to get what he can.
Doesn’t make me happy.
Extremely disappointed in Trump 2.0.
@JaxenReport You just have to believe RFK is not being allowed to run HHS as he wants.
I’m really coming to the belief we cannot vote our way out of the trouble and corruption that is this government.
Wired obtained more than a thousand pages of unpublished reports from the Department of Homeland Security, the FBI, and fusion centers originally created after 9/11 to track terrorism. Those resources are now being directed at Americans attending town hall meetings to oppose data centers in their communities. DHS has classified this activity as an "emerging threat."
Town hall meetings and budget committee hearings are the precise forums the Constitution exists to protect. Showing up to one and opposing a data center in your neighborhood is not extremism. It is the system working as designed.
@DowdEdward thinks this is less about which administration is in power and more about a bureaucratic institution that has expanded its own definition of threat to include anyone exercising constitutional rights in ways that inconvenience powerful interests.
His position applies regardless of political affiliation: if you are targeting people for using their constitutional rights, he is against it, and the targeting of data center opponents is no different from vaccine mandates in that regard.
@AlexBerenson Yep, measles is an extremely contagious disease, but rarely serious for healthy kids.
If we actually knew what dangers the vaccine had we could make an informed choice.