@machines_witch @CharlieKNews You have no idea what “treason” means, do you? It means levying war against the US or colluding with the enemy when at war. Doesn’t apply here.
@MAGALi0n@Scaramucci The Australian Broadcasting Corporation did a survey on who Australians would vote for if they could vote in the US election. The whole world loves him? Yeah, nawr!
@aw11man @phsjr1@Patri0tContr0l “Canuck” only has one “n”. It has nothing to do with citizen/non-citizen. The military cannot be used to carry out civilian law enforcement activities.
@BuzzzStryker@Trumpertarian@GingerLGaetz@mattgaetz Interesting. Looks like that was the first time anybody questioned the assertion. However, the men who served under Lt. Lorance felt he was guilty of a war crime. Accepting a pardon may not have been an admission of guilt but he would have likely failed in his appeal.
@seanmdav @DevittDion16320 Illegally seized phones? No. To do that, you need a search warrant. That comes from a judge—a judge who has been given evidence that a crime may have been committed and that the phones will contain relevant evidence. If the judge isn’t convinced, they won’t issue a warrant.
@ValentinaForUSA@JDVance Let’s not forget that every FBI search warrant says that. DJT gets the same treatment as every other US citizen when it comes to FBI search warrants, and that’s the way it should be.
@hollandcourtney Considering that Trump’s brain has turned to mush in the last decade or so, it’s good that younger people will be involved in govt. But did it have to be these younger people?