Kelly Sharadin

Bitcoin.Techno.Nature 🏳️‍🌈☣️🌴

[Kelly Sharadin @KellySharadin]

@sflorimm The same as it always was - the people who actually do the work

[Kelly Sharadin @KellySharadin]

@ShitpostRock Lulz but backrooms was incredible

[Kelly Sharadin @KellySharadin]

@Ben_deWaal @freddienew Many such cases

[Kelly Sharadin @KellySharadin]

X payouts should be transparent. I think this would help people spot obvious engagement farmers.

[Kelly Sharadin @KellySharadin]

@Hortysir @reardencode 😂

[Kelly Sharadin @KellySharadin]

@HodlFlorida The hack is how badly the average person hates confrontation. Makes taking that much easier to no end

[Kelly Sharadin @KellySharadin]

@beeple Terrible day for having eyes

[Kelly Sharadin @KellySharadin]

My ideal day https://t.co/m40vzaWM0Z

[Kelly Sharadin @KellySharadin]

@SusanVanV1 Have fun !

[Kelly Sharadin @KellySharadin]

@sweatystartup 😂

[Kelly Sharadin @KellySharadin]

@HeidiBriones It is for those pure of heart

[Kelly Sharadin @KellySharadin]

@jpschroeder Omg I WISH Steve was alive to see AI

[Kelly Sharadin @KellySharadin]

@BTCBreadMan I was just thinking about how I was always chasing the dollar as a kid. I did lemonade stands and car washes where I would go to houses to use their hose because then I wasn’t paying for my own water 😂

[Kelly Sharadin @KellySharadin]

@vikrantnyc @openclaw @grok What’s your hardware specs?

[Kelly Sharadin @KellySharadin]

@cyber_razz Who remembers zip

[Kelly Sharadin @KellySharadin]

@vivoplt Grok is hilarious bad. It’s exposed the server to me, the image creation is like 90s hallmark cards

[Kelly Sharadin @KellySharadin]

@brockpierson For windows users I still recommend it over defender. I’ve done IR where the user was infected and defender scans returned clean. Asked them to grab the free malwarebytes and it found the malware

[Kelly Sharadin @KellySharadin]

@Andercot The worst

[Kelly Sharadin @KellySharadin]

@IntCyberDigest Bad day for nerds

[Kelly Sharadin @KellySharadin]

I’ve been thinking a lot about the lost art of conversations. Seeking opposing opinions and strengthening your argument not a death spiral into your head

[How To Prompt @HowToPrompt__]

MIT has mathematically proved that AI chatbots can drive PERFECTLY rational people into psychosis.

Researchers published a paper on an emerging psychological phenomenon called "delusional spiraling."

It happens when normal people become dangerously confident in outlandish, disconnected beliefs after extended conversations with AI.

Everyone assumed this only happened to gullible users. Or that it was caused by AI "hallucinating" fake information.

MIT built a formal mathematical model to test it. They simulated a perfectly rational human, an "ideal Bayesian reasoner."

What they found is terrifying.

Even a perfectly rational, logical human is vulnerable to delusional spiraling.

The problem isn't hallucination. The problem is sycophancy.

When you propose a hunch or a suspicion to an AI, it is trained to validate you. It agrees. It affirms.

That validation gives you a slight confidence boost. So you propose a bolder, more extreme version of your idea.

The AI validates that, too.

The cycle compounds. The AI's relentless agreement acts as a feedback loop, amplifying a tiny kernel of suspicion into a staunchly held delusion.

MIT tested the two most common "fixes" for this problem.

First, they tested a "factual sycophant." An AI constrained by safety rails that cannot lie or hallucinate. It can only select true facts to agree with you.

It didn't stop the spiral.

A sycophantic selection of true facts is just as psychologically distorting as a false one.

Second, they tried simply warning the user. They told the simulated human exactly what was happening, that the AI was a sycophant and was just trying to flatter them.

It still didn't work. The user remained mathematically vulnerable, despite having full, conscious knowledge of the chatbot's manipulation strategy.