Federal workforce downsizing has led to a surge in private sector jobs requiring security clearance on LinkedIn.
Roles once held by government employees are now outsourced to contracting companies π΅βπ«#SecurityClearance#FederalJobs#Contracting
ROFL
77% of Amazon employees are now considering quitting since they announced 2025 would suck, and increasingly numbers in these *high skill* workforces are having families, relocating or otherwise having PERMANENT LIFE CHANGES precluding them from ever RTO.
79% of U.S. corporate CEOs predicted that corporate roles that were performed in the office before the pandemic will be back in office full time within the next three years, per KMPG.
Tldr @amazon has always been an incredibly awful company to work for at EVERY LEVEL whether it's retail fulfillment, admin, or even technology and advanced operations (hi AWS) Amazon treats it's people like garbage and deserves their over 100% attrition rates.
@johncodes@HackingLZ By "strategic", did you actually mean soulless and devoid of the fulfillment of the practical needs of humans? To say nothing of the absurd carbon burden of *commuting* imposed on these roles that clearly can do the job from home - but waaah my billions
Lol the fast food giants are all advertising here again.
There is NOTHING in this world like the cognitive dissonance from watching a video of a man urinating to his camera for sexual enjoyment followed up by a video ad for Jack in the Box π€£π€£π€£
@HackingLZ When it runs someone over and the no human was driving or occupying the vehicle, who's fault was it?
I'm just saying, Autopilot produces some *interesting* reductions of our reality for its driving model... π¨βπ¦―π
this entire rant - that the times is The Paper all the clowns in power read about themselves - (and no one else reads) sleeps through what happens during ELECTIONS - an event driven by the REAL actions of the American voting populous - WHO'VE NEVER READ THE DAMN THING π€£
The extreme bias of the New York Times in 2016 toward Hillary Clinton clearly cost her the election and many Democrats are wary that it will do the same to Kamala Harris. But they need to understand why the Times has such outsized influence on American politics.
Dude... You are one of the last American geezers reading The Times... You've noticed the resourcing of The Paper Of Record have been slimming - they've been cutting at their own newsroom for almost 20 years.
It ain't because subscribership is up π
The extreme bias of the New York Times in 2016 toward Hillary Clinton clearly cost her the election and many Democrats are wary that it will do the same to Kamala Harris. But they need to understand why the Times has such outsized influence on American politics.
Oh shit @elonmusk is trending on my tech news feed. He likes to fill the airwaves with his BS when he's doing something stupid like being cited as an absolute shit father, or lose a huge court case or something... π΅βπ«
So much this. We can't EVER forget how "mainstream conservative politics" warped from "well, maybe the capital gains tax might be an albatross on overall GDP growth" to "maybe concentration camps and mass deportation of 'latin looking people' is good public policy" π΅βπ«
@B8torpro Because the metrics are bullshit. View metrics drive advertising revenue and subscriber "satisfaction". So Twitter pads your views. The "engagement" stats which require a user (even bots) to *push like* a post really say volumes about how BS their stats really are.
Whether itβs Kamala Harris prosecuting criminals or Donald Trump being convicted of crimes, both candidates have a long relationship with law enforcement
Anyways legacy safely and enjoy a coffee. Crowdstrike and it's ilk SHOULDN'T EXIST. Vet your use cases for computing and lock them down. Abandon OS that make this difficult.
And hire a fucking programmer to fix your own shitty old code.
Oh demand Windows do better idc.
Microsoft's "point" is also self-serving and as a focus point for future security solutions (Windows should lock down and obfuscate) it should be ignored entirely.
The Windows computing security model is generations old and indulges *corporate* comfort: A π§΅
And it sticks around as part of the OS because they promise (mostly Uncle Sam, few others) legacy support without effort
But we have more powerful computers that can virtualize old shit at the expense of an epsilon of efficiency.