The tactical brilliace trap, where tactical prowess is rewarded above and beyond the skills required to actually apply force in a meaningful context. I.e. when establishments start to believe their own bullshit. It's the bane of militaries everywhere.
@CdrEricson@MtarfaL Also, strictly speaking, requisitioned by the Norwegian Navy in 1939. Served through armed neutrality and Norwegian campaign. Transferred from RNoN to RN in '41. Returned to RNoN in '44 and to civilian service in '45.
The UK’s Shadow AG has put out his thoughts on the legality of assuring US/Israeli strikes. Let’s take a quick look at his points, point by point. Now, I’m not a lawyer but I have spent 35 years fighting for and within it. 🧵1/12
@war_student@simonharley@IBallantyn The Naval Academy C-in-C in question has published an opinion piece on academic freedom in a military context. Well worth the five minutes it takes to read.
Text in Norwegian, but Google Translate or the like should suffice.
https://t.co/ZtHDto4arU
@war_student@simonharley@IBallantyn I suspect you may be right. We retain both uniformed and civilian academics at our defence academies, and the line between them can be blurry. I certainly would be very surprised if the heads of the Naval Academy or NDUC took issue with Strømmen criticising govt naval policy.
@war_student@simonharley@IBallantyn Very much dependent upon topic and setting. Chatham House certainly not unheard of, but far from the norm. Discussing defence related matters on the record with a journalist on condition of anonymity would be highly unusual.
@simonharley@IBallantyn Lectures at the NDUC defence academies have academic freedom in matters directly related to our field of expertise. We also have a duty to contribute to an active and facts-based national discourse on defence matters.