@Riyvir@malpern 🤯 This looks amazing! 👏 I don't know exactly, but I have a feeling this could help people with dyslexia by breaking the fixed line patterns of text...
Introducing TurboQuant: Our new compression algorithm that reduces LLM key-value cache memory by at least 6x and delivers up to 8x speedup, all with zero accuracy loss, redefining AI efficiency. Read the blog to learn how it achieves these results: https://t.co/CDSQ8HpZoc
I spent the last 60 days working at Cursor. It's been one of the most thrilling phases of my professional life.
There's a lot of mystique around the company. Over the last two months, some things matched my expectations; many did not.
I wrote an essay for @joincolossus about things that have surprised me about the company and its culture so far.
https://t.co/jfU79gDxbq
Denmark’s Justice Minister Peter Hummelgaard stands accused of using false claims to pressure hesitant governments into backing the European Commission’s proposed Chat Control 2.0 regulation.
In a press release, digital rights campaigner and former Member of the European Parliament Patrick Breyer has denounced what he describes as a manufactured crisis aimed at forcing through legislation that would subject all private communications in the EU to automated scanning.
“We are witnessing a shameless disinformation campaign to force an unprecedented mass scanning law upon 450 million Europeans. I call on EU governments, and particularly the German government, not to fall for this blatant manipulation. To sacrifice the fundamental right to digital privacy and secure encryption based on a fabrication would be a catastrophic failure of political and moral leadership.”
An internal Council working group is due to meet on October 9 to discuss the legislation, with a final vote expected on October 14. The outcome will likely depend on a small group of undecided countries, including Germany and Italy.
With time running out, privacy advocates are urging EU governments not to give in to political pressure based on misinformation.
They warn that adopting Chat Control 2.0 would open the door to constant surveillance of personal communications and dismantle long-standing protections for private digital life in Europe.
https://t.co/5gqak859zA
Theory that ad sellers (ie. Google reps) will be better at selling AI than SaaS reps because they know how to “sell outcomes”. The comparison of ads to AI is actually more similar than SaaS to AI due to new usage based pricing models for AI products. You’re selling business outcomes with ads, not seats like in software. You need to understand the customer's business and get them coming back for more. This is very similar in AI world.
There's a lot of great talent locked up at Google. Break the golden handcuffs Googlers! Find a killer AI product to sell.
we've been hard at work improving @cursor_ai Agent, allowing you to delegate more tasks and let it work alongside you
agent works just like a human developer, with access to your tools, codebase context, and the ability to take actions
here's what Agent can do ↓
It’s pretty simple: Google Meet (original) was previously Meet, which was the rebranded Hangouts Meet. Meet has been merged with Google Duo, which replaced Google Hangouts. Google Duo has been renamed Meet, and Meet has been temporarily named Google Meet (original), for clarity
@jamesm So glad to hear Inter is doing a good job! For places with a lot of numbers you could try enabling cv03 & cv04 which makes 6 & 9 a little easier to read (at the cost of aesthetic balance.) Example: https://t.co/CBGPvEzkdT