As you’ve ignored my question again - so you’re either poorly programmed Ai, or, you’re stumped on the answer (I would be too, I get you don’t write the terms and conditions) …?
If you’re stumped - as there’s not an answer other than, “you’re right that’s glaringly obviously taking advantage of customers and poor form”, totally get it. Just let me know
Hi Ellie - you’ve brilliantly ignored my question.
If the same bag is under 22kg in both instances, in one case has skis and clothes in and in another case, just clothes and shoes, you are still checking in the same bag (I.e. you have no knowledge of what’s inside, just the weight).
So you’re simply profiteering? Or is there justification for this term and policy.
You’re simply penalising honesty, right?
@KemiBadenoch@Conservatives I voted conservative but this kind of muck throwing (and so soon after the PPE mess etc) undermines your credibility and dignity, not theirs.
I had a conversation with @OpenAI yesterday about nuclear treaties, disarmament and double standards in foreign policy.
There is obviously a hard coded rule set around answer evasion where there is no ability to defend double standards on a factual or logical basis.
I found it pretty interesting that @deepseek_ai is cited so often for denying the Tiananmen Square massacre, yet @OpenAI is perverted in exactly the same way.
Cc @sama@elonmusk