منده

ما أطيب البلوى لدى العشاق

[منده @mandah4v5j]

@ibnajibah @AbouAbbasss @ibnassakir Time to shut it up and get lost a'jami boy

[منده @mandah4v5j]

@ibnajibah @AbouAbbasss @ibnassakir Oh you can't read arabic, should've told it from the beginning

[منده @mandah4v5j]

@hashimiyy_ @othmaanX @wannabemuhadith Hhh yeah i don't really care, you got the point that's what matters.

No not from an idol, from buddha the real dude that existed, he believes he is closer to Allah than him and thus a great wasilah

[منده @mandah4v5j]

@hashimiyy_ @othmaanX @wannabemuhadith He believes Allah is the only musabbib, the only lord and that what he does with buddha is a mere wasilah to Allah.

What nullifier did he commit ?

[منده @mandah4v5j]

@ibnajibah @AbouAbbasss @ibnassakir Can this jahmi read?

1. Ibn hajar gives no argument, kashmiri does
2. I brought it just to show there's other external testimonies
3. "and what emerges within Him is different from what emerges within the creation" yeah nothing is clear you're right

[منده @mandah4v5j]

@scribeofmedinah Jewish taʼwilat:

Eye of Allah = His care
Face of Allah = His agreement
Hand of Allah = His power

#ClassicalPureAshari

[منده @mandah4v5j]

@raqqadrift @ProjectGuiding Yeah in principle, but the christian seemed to be only looking for gotcha points anyway

[منده @mandah4v5j]

@ibnajibah @AbouAbbasss @ibnassakir Ibn hajar has no argument except his own principles.

The creed of al-bukhari is pretty clear, but if we're some stubborn dishonest jahmi who needs some external testimony, here's anwar al-kashmiri arguing that al-bukhari has the belief of ibn taymiyah on sifat ikhtiyariyah

[منده @mandah4v5j]

@hashimiyy_ @othmaanX @wannabemuhadith Are we pretending tawhid and shirk aren't mere matters of belief to you ?

To you, a hindu and a muslim can live the same life with daily invocations to buddha, sacrifices and prayers to him, it's shirk for the hindu but okay for the "muslim" cause he thinks Allah is the musabbib

[منده @mandah4v5j]

@daralmehbra حبذا إصدار باقي مؤلفات الشيخ

[منده @mandah4v5j]

@Ma3bari Pure delusion

[منده @mandah4v5j]

@jado375 @raqqadrift @IbnAzizAlDin So is negating the plurality of eternal existents other than Allah, but it's also a mu'tazili position and if it's addressed their way then we say it, same thing

[منده @mandah4v5j]

@jado375 @raqqadrift @IbnAzizAlDin It is part of their view, now get lost you wasted my time

[منده @mandah4v5j]

@jado375 @raqqadrift @IbnAzizAlDin It's not about the number it's about the context in the speech, did you even watch what you sent ? He quotes someone who listed at least 5 or 6 things just to negate it this is NOT the case you just mentionned

[Jad 🇸🇾 @jado375]

@raqqadrift @mandah4v5j @IbnAzizAlDin Thankfully i never mentioned a transcript, did i?

I am referring to what he said in this video. Is it correct what he said about negating blood?

[منده @mandah4v5j]

@jado375 @raqqadrift @IbnAzizAlDin I just explained to you that it's not about it being a mu'tazili view, it's about listing dozens of deflects to negate them about Allah. This is what amj says is the way of mu'tazilah and falasifah

[منده @mandah4v5j]

@jado375 @raqqadrift @IbnAzizAlDin Yes

[منده @mandah4v5j]

@User93227738 @HarounKanj Hahahahaaha no way

[منده @mandah4v5j]

@jado375 @raqqadrift @IbnAzizAlDin You should open a ash'ari or mu'tazili book about the ilahiyat to understand what amj is aiming, behaving with Allah as if He was some kind of dissection Material (تقدس وتنزه)

But i guess scoring gotcha points against takfiris sounds better to you

[منده @mandah4v5j]

@jado375 @raqqadrift @IbnAzizAlDin Even though he didn't say it's kufr, his yes was either a transition one as done in arabic, either an answer to someone else far from the mic

3. Ibn Taymiyah doesn't list what Allah is not, he mentions what has been said and negates what is deflects to us