@Walker557947578@allTheYud@Miles_Brundage I read something like this somewhere: other primates are not smart enough to create and sustain a technological civilization, but humans have almost identical DNA, so the tweak is small. Thus, we can infer that humans are close to “the dumbest a civilized species can be.”
@foomagemindset@Vert_Noel@VesselOfSpirit@cephaloform The point Noel seems to be making is: if you see an AI that is mighty enough to kill you, and yet hasn’t done so, means it doesn’t want to. It’s strong enough to not have to care whether or not you think it’s aligned; it has no incentive to fool you.
@alexgrenier@allTheYud His hope is that once we have smarter humans, we have a shot at building Superintelligence more safely (that is, in a way that doesn’t lead to “everyone dies”)
@Sakaushka@Aella_Girl Imagine you had cancer and someone asked “why aren’t you doing anything?”… “but I already had surgery and radiation and I’m doing chemo”… “that’s it? you haven’t even threatened your doctors? Or bombed any buildings? Doesn’t seem like you’re treating this as an emergency”
@TzviGot@allTheYud Maybe not “just” tweaking. I think he means that by the time you reach 50% you have insight and understanding far beyond what we have today, and this is a foundation you can build on. Whereas today, the doom guarantee stems from us not understanding at ALL what we’re doing.
@mooderino@chilagmanuel Did you refresh any good student chapters? Looks different than I remember from a while back. (Hope things are better than 2023 for you.)
@Georgism@ESYudkowsky@KristoffLen I think it’s pretty clear he doesn’t literally mean “indifferent”. He means “if the price of saving the world is that we punish one of the people endangering it more harshly than he deserves, so be it; that is not the hill I want to condemn the human race to die on.”
@hawtcode@slatestarcodex Re: link: to your substack I mean. It says page not found.
Re: not straight line: okay fair. Let’s be pedantic then. The claim is not “exponential”. The claim is “sigmoid”. But we haven’t hit the inflection point yet, so for now we’re effectively on an exponential.
@hawtcode@slatestarcodex 1. That link seems broken. 2. Re: “making an extraordinary claim”… is he really? The claim is basically of the form “straight line on graph has been going up for a long time with no sign of slowing down, so probably it will keep going up at least a little while longer”