I am not sorry for being one of the scientists & sleuths who pointed out data issues in the studies in 2020 that reported novel coronaviruses similar to the pandemic virus.
Especially because the resulting corrections and addendums confirmed these data issues.
@pjf8281@Florin_Uncovers The Pangolin data turned out to be obviously false / fraudulent, it only needed to have credibility for the week it took to get through the news cycle and bolster the Proximal Origins paper.
If a cynical liar, I'd drop the next fraud right on top of the congressional hearings.
I know lots of you are waiting for the Fauci #TwitterFiles drop… I get it. But I hope you’ll be patient. Those searches are complex (“Fauci” is in a LOT of emails).
And don’t sleep on @pfizer and @ScottGottliebMD - this is the swamp in action, with vast fortunes at stake.
COVID: summary of lab-origin hypothesis:
1) Pandemic caused by bat SARS-like coronavirus emerged in Wuhan--city 1,000 km from nearest wild bats with SARS-CoV-2-like coronaviruses, but that contains labs conducting world's largest research program on bat SARS-like coronaviruses.
@BiophysicsFL@CD57227 The fact that the outbreak was in the same city as the world's leading CoV research institute should have entailed an investigation - even without taking the FCS, BSL2, DEFUSE, etc into account.
It is a cruel and grotesque joke that we are still "debating" this on Twitter.
It’s an amazing moment when there are journalists in Canada concerned that criticism of public health officials who have lied for 3 years about the epidemiology, natural history and impact of sars-cov-2 **may be undermining the credibility of those public health officials**