朗拿度

[朗拿度 @mrkilr]

@beiligarden @letwin_anu 也没必要过渡否定，好像一丁点的信息透露不出来，也不至于，通缩有什么不好的话不也传出来了

[朗拿度 @mrkilr]

@joinstyd @SJ8075554 @wangjun1342 @XiaWan27472 美国有共产党，也可以去选总统，选议员，没人拦着，选上就可以执政

[朗拿度 @mrkilr]

@Potions_MasterX @netmanlee

[朗拿度 @mrkilr]

@mtrainier2020 @kukannnnn 人到六十岁以后还能种地吗？没有后人，土地没人租赁一样饿死，不如把土地转化成社保，六十岁后象城里人一样靠退休金养起来，中国为何老是内需不足，几亿人社保仅够吃馒头，把土地转换社保，退休金每月打到2千元，内需一下就活起来了。

[朗拿度 @mrkilr]

@Xictator @YesterdayBigcat

[朗拿度 @mrkilr]

@netmanlee @Potions_MasterX 这不是他的警官证吗，有什么可质疑的

[朗拿度 @mrkilr]

@huntwinkk @GulagJamun_ She went to the United States to study in high school, went to an American university and taught in the United States, not a doctoral student in Beijing.

[朗拿度 @mrkilr]

@shuangqiu 不伦不类，不如把社会主义彻底废除更好

[朗拿度 @mrkilr]

@wangjupaian 打台湾又得往后靠一靠了

[朗拿度 @mrkilr]

@SoSix666 说出通缩有什么不好的话，说明丫根本不懂经济，如果以他的意志为转移定经济政策就瞎了，怎么理解习呢，可以看姜文第一部电影开头，他两虽差了十岁，但受伟大领袖教育出来的一代人，也大差不差

[朗拿度 @mrkilr]

@SoSix666 投名状有些想当然了，老邓访美时卡特明确表达不希望打，越南背后是苏联，老美怕引起连锁反应，打主要是国内政治需要，老邓通过调动军权告诉党内谁是真正的话事人，从而最终搬到了华国锋，第二维持与柬埔寨以及东南亚的战略地位，中苏交恶已经纳了投名状，对越是自身需要

[朗拿度 @mrkilr]

@dreamwa23561699 @GodblessuDavid @HooJhuice 对啊，鲁大师绝对牛逼，习近平家族腐败的内幕除了他全网还真没有第二人公布出来。

[朗拿度 @mrkilr]

@GodblessuDavid @dreamwa23561699 @HooJhuice 中轨如果身在国内，有料也不敢抖出来，何况我也没看出他有料，当然根据公开信息分析比起习下李上的听床师强多了，但是政治解读，内幕消息是其核心竞争力，令计划薄熙来倒台，其家族成员官场人脉都报道了，也是当时政治环境允许透露出来，包括温家宝，这是公开信息压根不可能知道的

[朗拿度 @mrkilr]

@welovejiangjie https://t.co/w0bLxrORj3 此人主页一直挂着向习近平鞠躬握手的照片

[朗拿度 @mrkilr]

@foxshuo 委内瑞拉也签名了，谁签的，总督卢比奥吗？

[朗拿度 @mrkilr]

@ningwenzhong @wg2015709 他们是白人至上主义，非法移民只是个幌子，好比共产党没拿到政权时候批判国民党一党独裁遍地是灾一样

[Michael Pettis @michaelxpettis]

"You need to remain abreast of Beijing's policy dialogue to read the tea leaves of the Communist Party's intentions."

I am surprised you are suggesting that the problem is that I don't know that Beijing believes it is serious about wanting to raise the role of consumption in driving growth. Of course I know. Everyone knows, and has known for years.

That's also what the Japanese wanted in 1986. But simply saying they want it isn't enough, and I would have thought that after several years of failure in China, it might have become obvious by now that there is a difference between what is politically desirable and what is economically likely.

Beijing wants to raise the role of consumption in driving growth, but it also wants to do so without undermining growth. That's the real problem, and eventually many more policy advisors will understand that low consumption is not just an accident, or something an absent-minded policymaker forgot to do. It is fundamental to the structure of the economy.

This means that to raise the consumption share of the economy, wishful thinking is not enough. As we saw with Japan in the 1980s and after the adjustment began, China cannot sustainably raise the consumption share of GDP by more than an insignificant amount without undermining its manufacturing competitiveness, and with manufacturing representing such a high share of GDP (even higher than property development at its peak), China also cannot raise the consumption share of GDP without slowing GDP growth.

I am still a little shocked that there seems to be so little interest in understanding why other countries have wanted to do the same thing and found it so difficult.

[朗拿度 @mrkilr]

@vmr010 @mtrainier2020 真正的历史文献资料可以去知网找，新的要花钱，十年前的论文不需要花钱，免费下载https://t.co/hg6jnBF0FQ，你所谓自媒体史料，把链接给腾讯元宝，让他告诉你错误在哪里https://t.co/tBk10G20cz

[朗拿度 @mrkilr]

@Pladoooo @kfk_ai @NotJoule04 张高丽也是正国级吧

[朗拿度 @mrkilr]

@LaurenceMister 李强连新闻发布会都不敢开，还指望新朱镕基