Nanok Bie

Roaming journalist & author with roots in 🇸🇪 🇫🇮 🇺🇸 deciphering the 🌐 of 🤖💻📡📱 👽🌊🚀ℹ️.

[Nanok Bie @nanok]

@AlchemyAmerican "BREAKING"? This is YEARS OLD.

DO you know what the word "BREAKING" means @AlchemyAmerican? I am one of many that block any posts with that mega-stupid word. Do you care?

[Nanok Bie @nanok]

@rosscoulthart "Soon" more, just wait. "Sooooon". It is SO amazing what I can see. Not you. But "sooon". Just hang in there. Forever.

[Jimmy Corsetti @BrightInsight6]

Raise your hand if you first learned of GOBEKLI TEPE through Graham Hancock? 🙋🏼‍♂️

[Nanok Bie @nanok]

@FoMaHun @TheProjectUnity I've also been there, also inside the boxes, until the guards stopped me (no payola).

Looks cast to me!

[Nanok Bie @nanok]

@drleeclare @DeDunkingPast Haha ^ funny, as Rogan was probably the last (!) guy to discover Hancock et al...

[Nanok Bie @nanok]

@Weird_Old_World @derek__olson Remains of ancient hot-air balloons have been found, made of animal skins, in the area.

[Nanok Bie @nanok]

@NewYorker Not true. Have you actually checked the examples in that report? It's not "articles". It's corporate blog posts. You just publish this AI slop?

[Gary Marcus @GaryMarcus]

What I am about to describe ain’t AGI; it’s a sign of a trillion dollar trainwreck.

If I had told you in 2022 that the 2026 version of GPT (which by the way would only be GPT 5.5 and not GPT-6 or 7 like many people fantasized about) would still have strange quirks like inserting the word “goblins” in random places, y’all would have called me either “crazy” or “a hater” or both.

“Scaling”, you would have shouted. “Deep learning is conquering walls!”, you would have said.

And yet here we are.

OpenAI can’t even align their systems well enough to get them to stop talking about goblins without putting a bunch of utterly hack-y goblin-specific crud in their system prompts like (and I am not making this up) “never talk about goblins, gremlins, raccoons, trolls, ogres, pigeons, or other animals or creatures unless it is absolutely and unambiguously relevant to the user’s query."

Meanwhile, this nonsense varies by “persona”. An actual quasi-scientific report on their website reports, without humor, “Across all datasets in the audit, the Nerdy personality reward showed a clear tendency to score outputs to the same problem with “goblin” or “gremlin” higher than outputs without, with positive uplift in 76.2% of datasets.”

Instead of actual computer science, we are left with alchemy.

Might as well be chanting magic incantations.

Good luck solving AI safety with this tech. 🙄

[Nanok Bie @nanok]

@Henriksjos Enshittification?

[Nanok Bie @nanok]

@FoMaHun Nice banana! Btw, could you reproduce the process that results in visible nubs in a video? Maybe you have already?

[Nanok Bie @nanok]

@rosscoulthart @RepEricBurlison "Soon."

[Nanok Bie @nanok]

@JeremyCorbell @RepLuna The neverending alien psyop "Soon" (™).

[Nanok Bie @nanok]

@Rainmaker1973 In shallow waves, moving like a crab is very efficient. That's probably the reason. Try it yourself.

[Nanok Bie @nanok]

@elkelk status signaling

[Nanok Bie @nanok]

@RepEricBurlison @realDonaldTrump Complete BS. These are old debunked videos found on the Internet. The deep state is trolling you guys...

[Nanok Bie @nanok]

@LegacyProgramVP @EricBurlison @timburchett @realannapaulina Really embarrassing.

[Nanok Bie @nanok]

@realannapaulina Really embarrassing for everybody this release of typical camera defects and such nonsense. You have no idea what you are doing. You cannot see the difference.

[Nanok Bie @nanok]

@fanthombird @chrisramsay52 There are no "back and forth" movements. It's a missile or smh similar manouvering. It's what it looks like when missiles manouver. Go check some missile videos, see from the front, them approaching, they make evasive manouvers (or just dashes) just like this one...

[Nanok Bie @nanok]

@NASAAdmin It's a pretend release... just stuff that kinda looks like UFOs. They are all explainable, at will, later on, when this alien psyop distraction is not needed anymore.