Nathaniel

just a human trying to understand how the world works and how i ought to live in it (he/him)

[Nathaniel @nattydaddy98]

@InVitroFuture among natural athletes this probably applies to endurance sports more

[Nathaniel @nattydaddy98]

@morallawwithin the goat concurs https://t.co/CvecCjIlfr

[Macrophysiological System🐀 @InVitroFuture]

Because sentient animals evolved to pursue their own flourishing, not our instrumental goals, any workflow that exploits them as biological machines can in theory be made more efficient, reproducible, and humane by replacing the animals with designed-to-purpose synthetic systems.

[Nathaniel @nattydaddy98]

@LeahLibresco https://t.co/KlptkhtZ2f

florence has the correct take on the relationship between these issues imo

[florence 🦐🏳️‍🌈 @morallawwithin]

As much as I’d love to have another argument against the flesh-eaters, I think there’s basically no relationship between these two issues. Whether you’re vegan or not comes down to whether you think all sentient beings should get non-negligible moral consideration; whether you’re anti-abortion comes down (at least for many people) to whether you thing human life (in the morally relevant sense, obviously) starts when you’re sentient, can use reason, or at conception. Even if you view certain answers to these questions as ridiculous, bracketing that, any combination of answers is as consistent and natural as they would be alone.

[Nathaniel @nattydaddy98]

@bkogel89 @jon_stewartmill not in the field but isn’t ppe in america a bit more classical liberal/libertarian than other academic subnetworks?

[Nathaniel @nattydaddy98]

@HarrisBolus @JannyWurts starting residency?

[Nathaniel @nattydaddy98]

@besttrousers old matt darling “dont confuse mean and median”
new matt darling “don’t forget equilibrium”

[Nathaniel @nattydaddy98]

@waldenpod panpsychists should go back to calling it neutral monism

[Nathaniel @nattydaddy98]

@mean_field_zane i hate poor people as well …. give them cash and appropriate insurance to erase them mwah hah hah

[Nathaniel @nattydaddy98]

@PAHoyeck @LatFilosof just ask if a virtuous person would do it

[Nathaniel @nattydaddy98]

@WillowChem sounds very cool! i love how the kelly criterion can also be used to understand cellular bet hedging https://t.co/txlQBfo1Td

[Nathaniel @nattydaddy98]

@AndyMasley would be curious to hear how braudel influenced you

[Nathaniel @nattydaddy98]

@DeivonDrago have you ever engaged the work of huw price?

[Nathaniel @nattydaddy98]

@hassankhan although this might be closer to what ur looking for https://t.co/Y3R79Or905

[Nathaniel @nattydaddy98]

@hassankhan https://t.co/rzZg85mnFn

is this what u were thinking about?

[Nathaniel @nattydaddy98]

@MatthewHartke bro finna head to the quote mines on tucker ferdas book

[Nathaniel @nattydaddy98]

@RafaRuizdeLira @DaCaveOfWonders doesn’t this sound like quine on translation? gavagi?

[Nathaniel @nattydaddy98]

@PAHoyeck i hold to an identity theory where villains = automobile drivers

[Nathaniel @nattydaddy98]

@mean_field_zane @t_holden @ben_golub apologies if this question makes no sense lol

[Nathaniel @nattydaddy98]

@mean_field_zane @t_holden @ben_golub would the type of rigor u advocate for have avoided the mistake of chamley judd as identified in this paper? https://t.co/VRnRNN2GeW