Nick Rainwater

[Nick Rainwater @nickrain202]

@PolPredictions @Shawn_Farash GOP flipping NH too. You heard it here first

[Nick Rainwater @nickrain202]

@Amicus_Curious_ @ZazCarla @derek_debus Because jeopardy terminates when the case reaches a final binding conclusion that bars future prosecution. In this case, that is a verdict. You must have both attachment AND termination for “double jeopardy” protections to fully apply

[Nick Rainwater @nickrain202]

@cutelipssx And Lindsay Clancy is a child killer who is being hailed as a hero by women everyone. What’s your point?

[Nick Rainwater @nickrain202]

@douglassmackey This guy is about to be a millionaire and the face of a movement if all of that is true

[Nick Rainwater @nickrain202]

@EricLDaugh Public executions and vigilantism solves this. Since we’ve reverted back to a pre-civilized society, we must meet that with pre-civilized punishments. Only then will be relearn lessons we’ve known for centuries

[Nick Rainwater @nickrain202]

@MAGAVoice File ethics complaints! It’s not that hard. Kevin J. Reddington, 1342 Belmont St, Suite 203, Brockton MA. Bar number 414160.

https://t.co/avzjmUpmLS

[Nick Rainwater @nickrain202]

@FormanLaw1 Then file an ethics complaint against him.

[Nick Rainwater @nickrain202]

@monadical @JonathanTurley That juror has bigger balls than Reddington could ever dream of having. He’ll be just fine. But if for some reason you’re right and he’s not, we make sure the need for a second Clancy trial is permanently removed

[Nick Rainwater @nickrain202]

@JonathanTurley It should also warrant an ethics complaint

[Nick Rainwater @nickrain202]

@RichardLipowicz @mirandadevine He saw the images of those three dead kids blue in the face from being strangled to death and knew that was a bright line for him, like it would be for any normal and moral human being who isn’t a sociopath or likes dead kids

[Nick Rainwater @nickrain202]

@mirandadevine That man has bigger balls that Reddington could ever dream of. He’ll be just fine. But if he needs help, there are plenty of men with balls ready to stand guard with him.

[Nick Rainwater @nickrain202]

@mirandadevine Scumbag people often hire scumbag lawyers. Never forget that

[Nick Rainwater @nickrain202]

@JulieCar94 File an ethics complaint against him. Seriously. That’s the only way to reign this lawlessness in.

[Nick Rainwater @nickrain202]

@thevivafrei They should have been instructed on that already before their deliberations started. This case is getting appealed no matter what at this point. And frankly it should have been a mistrial already. What a clown show

[Nick Rainwater @nickrain202]

@JackPosobiec @MattWalshBlog The fact that the defense attorney identified the juror as a man on the record, on a jury with only 3 men, is an ethical violation and was clearly done to intimidate that juror. This case will 100% be appealed and very likely reversed at this point. Just call the mistrial

[Nick Rainwater @nickrain202]

@IredcapI @1000HolyPlaces @JackPosobiec Or the defense has been improperly communicating with the jury and knows the true split. For him to argue on the record that the 11-1 is in favor of not guilty and identify the holdout as a man on a jury with only 3 men is an ethical violation and very clearly intimidation

[Nick Rainwater @nickrain202]

@honeybeaSQ @EricLDaugh What? If she’s found not guilty, the verdict will be appealed and very likely overturned if this juror is intimidated into changing their vote. She would be retried after that point

[Nick Rainwater @nickrain202]

@thevivafrei Scumbag piece of shit people almost always hire scumbag piece of shit lawyers

[Nick Rainwater @nickrain202]

@JackPosobiec Women pick on kids because they’re smaller and weaker than them. Simple as that.

[Nick Rainwater @nickrain202]

@JackPosobiec This is juror intimidation. And if the judge openly identifies and questions this juror in open court for everyone to see, before a verdict is rendered, that will be grounds for a mistrial and will almost certainly be appealed