MegaMind

RT is not an endorsement, Tweets are a totally personal opinion.

[UP POLICE @Uppolice]

अज्ञात व्यक्तियों द्वारा APK फाइल डाउनलोड कराकर एवं फर्जी अधिकारी बनकर डरा-धमकाकर दो पीड़ितों से ठगी किए गए ₹1,50,198/- @Barabankipolice द्वारा वापस कराए गए।

खाते से धोखाधड़ी से पैसा निकलने की दशा में तुरंत 1930 पर कॉल करें या https://t.co/W7HzGMfw1t पर शिकायत दर्ज करें।

#UPPCracksCyberCrime
#UPAgainstCyberCrime
#CyberSafeUP

[MegaMind @njoyashu]

@DCPCityPrj @Uppolice @prayagraj_pol Thank you for the kindful support.

[MegaMind @njoyashu]

माननीय @Uppolice जी,
मेरा चरित्र सत्यापन (Character Verification) UP COP पोर्टल पर अभी भी लंबित दिखा रहा है, जबकि आधार सत्यापन स्थानीय पुलिस स्टेशन द्वारा पूरा किया जा चुका है।
कृपया मेरे आवेदन की स्थिति की जांच कर इसे शीघ्र अपडेट कराने की कृपा करें।
धन्यवाद।

[MegaMind @njoyashu]

@dhruv_rathee Then what is oligarch??

[MegaMind @njoyashu]

@akshaymarch7 Just for the showoff

[manasvi @manasvi_dadhich]

ha bhai sab dead hai, bus course bechna hi bacha h

[State Bank of India @TheOfficialSBI]

Whether it’s the power of knowledge through an education loan or the comfort of a new home with a home loan, the all-new YONO helps to turn your biggest milestones into reality.

[Anand Ranganathan @ARanganathan72]

Umr bhar judge yahi bhool karta raha, dhool chehre par thi, aaina saaf karta raha.

Judicial corruption in India is not only real, it is rampant. The Supreme court may have extracted a grovelling apology from a spineless NCERT but it forgets - you can run milords, you can't hide.

[Saurav Das @SauravDassss]

The manner in which Chief Justice Surya Kant’s bench is proceeding in the #NCERT matter is terribly disquieting.

If the Chief Justice truly wishes, in his own words, to “catch the bull by the horn,” then there is a far worthier place to begin: with accountability within the institution. Let the Chief Justice tell the country what happened to those 8630 COMPLAINTS AGAINST SITTING JUDGES received by the Chief Justice of India’s Office over the last 10 years!

The Chief Justice’s bench is not only coming down heavily on the textbook chapter, but also now overseeing the proposal for an expert panel to vet future content touching the judiciary! Even more troubling is the manner in which the Chief Justice made severe, contemptuous remarks against academics who may actually possess a deeper engagement with history, pedagogy and democratic theory than some judges who sit in judgment over them, all WITHOUT affording them any opportunity to respond, explain, or defend their work!

As I wrote in my column for @frontline_india, the team associated with drafting the chapter may have exercised its policy discretion in concluding that the problem of judicial corruption was serious enough to warrant prominence in the chapter. Can the court then condemn this in this manner, for a policy choice they were entitled to make? Where is the procedural fairness, at the very least? To publicly censure scholars, taint their reputations, and then ensure, in practical effect, that they are kept away from future government work is disproportionate and is only a form of judicial punishment without trial. (Column here: https://t.co/wa5NLj40Lf)

The question is not whether school textbooks should be accurate, balanced or responsibly written. Of course they should! The question is whether a constitutional court can intervene in so SWEEPING and HIGH-HANDED a manner that it effectively begins to supervise pedagogy, blacklist academics by judicial signal, and expand its own oversight from one chapter in one book to future textbooks of higher classes that may mention the judiciary at all. That is not adjudication but an institutional overreach DRESSED UP as constitutional guardianship! Since when did the Court become a curriculum authority? Since when did retired members of the judicial fraternity become the natural custodians of how young citizens are to be taught about courts, corruption, criticism and institutional failure?

One would have thought that, in a democracy, the judiciary earns public trust by the force of its conduct and reasoning.

As for the Chief Justice’s reported remarks on social-media criticism, that critics must know how to “deal” with him, the language is simply ASTONISHING, though keeping in line with Chief Justice’s similar past utterances. The language is wholly unbecoming of a constitutional court, let alone of the highest judge in the country. A judge may be stern, may be offended, and may even warn against reckless imputations. But the language of personal settling, of teaching dissidents how to “deal” with him, belongs to street power, not constitutional power. In one of my other @frontline_india columns, I wrote about judicial temperament. Such language actually betrays a temper that is DANGEROUSLY at odds with the restraint, distance, and moral seriousness that the office of a judge demands. (Column here: https://t.co/RM3pQT5K4v)

The 8630 complaints, let the Chief Justice of India place in the public domain the details of how those complaints were handled, screened, buried, or acted upon.

Let him show the standards by which allegations of corruption, impropriety, conflict of interest, and sexual misconduct are treated when they concern judges themselves.

My RTIs have failed because opacity has been elevated into doctrine at the Supreme Court of India. But what the RTIs have achieved is to unveil this doctrine before the country. Can it be in institutional interest for the Chief Justice to continue maintaining opacity around the complaints which is precisely what fuels public suspicion?

It is far too easy to threaten contempt and legal troubles against citizens, academics, lawyers, or social-media users who speak about corruption in the judiciary.

But Chief Justice Kant must know that it is far harder to build an ethic of public confidence through transparency, self-scrutiny and demonstrable fairness.

That is the real test of integrity. Not muscular language from the bench. And not such coercive sanitisation of criticism. So can the judiciary submit itself to the standards of accountability that it so routinely demands from everyone else? Can Chief Justice Kant ensure this during his term?

[MegaMind @njoyashu]

@NewsAlgebraIND @khanumarfa

[Prashant Bhushan @pbhushan1]

I have read the 18 page chapter on the Judiciary which was in the new NCERT textbook of class 8. I find it to be a balanced chapter about the structure, role & achievements of the Judiciary. In the last 2 pages it mentions Delays & Corruption as among the challenges faced by it.
This ham handed order by the SC is a self goal which has further highlighted the problem of corruption in the Judiciary

[वरुण 🇮🇳 @varungrover]

Not enough. I think public lashings and desh-nikaala should be added to the punishment.

[Raghav Chadha @raghav_chadha]

Prepaid Recharge Customers के साथ हो रही लूट का मुद्दा आज मैंने Parliament में उठाया।

(a) अगर आपका recharge खत्म हो जाए तो Outgoing Calls बंद होना समझ में आता है, लेकिन Incoming Calls बंद करना मनमानी है।रिचार्ज खत्म होते ही न कोई आपसे संपर्क कर सकता है और न ही आपके फोन पर OTP जैसे जरूरी मैसेज आ पाते हैं। Emergency के हालातों में व्यक्ति बेसहारा हो जाता है।

(b) 28 दिन का Recharge plan एक scam है। साल में महीने 12 होते हैं लेकिन रिचार्ज 13 बार करवाना पड़ता है (28 days x 13 times = 364 days).
Recharge plan की वैधता calender months (30–31 दिन) के हिसाब से होनी चाहिए, क्योंकि 28 दिन के चक्कर में लोगों को साल भर में एक अतिरिक्त रिचार्ज करवाना पड़ता है।

मोबाइल आज के समय में Luxury नहीं, बल्कि आम नागरिक की Necessity बन चुका है।

इसलिए टेलीकॉम कंपनियों को उपभोक्ताओं के साथ Fair और Transparent रवैया रखना चाहिए।

[MegaMind @njoyashu]

@ShivAroor @juicystar1908 Another nobody unfollows you...

[MegaMind @njoyashu]

@sanket Where is mohammad deepak now

[MegaMind @njoyashu]

@IndianTechGuide Good

[MegaMind @njoyashu]

@TheRedMike @Saurabh_Unmute चाचा जान ईरान ईरान में इजरायल का जहाज नहीं गिरा पा रहा है लेकिन कुवैत में गिरा दिया ।
भाई ऊपर दिमाग नाम का चीज होती है

[MegaMind @njoyashu]

@Aunindyo2023 With this logic , What will u say about those who are mourning in india ?

[MegaMind @njoyashu]

@simplykashif So far it's human that ruins this earth not machine

[MegaMind @njoyashu]

@simplykashif Did he say anything wrong. ??? Focus on that