I

[Anthropic @AnthropicAI]

Introducing Project Glasswing: an urgent initiative to help secure the world’s most critical software.

It’s powered by our newest frontier model, Claude Mythos Preview, which can find software vulnerabilities better than all but the most skilled humans.
https://t.co/NQ7IfEtYk7

[GP Q @argosaki]

WOW … WHY DO JETS FLY AROUND EMPTY⁉️⁉️⁉️😱😱😱

[Dr Singularity @Dr_Singularity]

Scientists successfully transported 92 antiprotons in a truck around CERN, Europe’s particle physics laboratory, using specialized bottles which prevent contact with matter.

It proves we can physically move antimatter through the real world, opening the path to futuristic technologies and experiments that were once purely science fiction.

[Black Hole @konstructivizm]

CERN has completed the first successful transport of antimatter by truck. "Today we're doing something humanity has never done before," said German physicist Stefan Ulmer, who spent six years preparing for the transport as part of a team at CERN, the European Organization for Nuclear Research. This test drive could be the first step toward solving one of the greatest mysteries of particle physics, according to the ARD program "Tagesschau."

The truck bore the inscription "Antimatter in motion." The 92 antiprotons on board were placed in a container weighing approximately 850 kg—a so-called "Penning trap," which the researchers developed specifically for this transport. Using superconducting magnets, the antimatter particles float in a strictly controlled vacuum, Ulmer explained. A large pothole or even a minor accident could have been fatal for the hovering antimatter particles. The car was traveling at 42 km/h.

The goal of the half-hour test drive was to eventually transport the antiprotons to the Heinrich-Heine University in Düsseldorf, where a quieter magnetic environment would allow for measurements 1,000 times more precise than those possible at CERN. The European Organization for Nuclear Research is located on the Franco-Swiss border near Geneva. It is home to the Large Hadron Collider (pictured) – a 27-kilometer-long, circular tunnel buried at a depth of up to 175 meters.

[robyn @_robyn_smith]

Why does it cost less to build a base on the moon than high speed rail from sf to la

[DepressedBergman @DannyDrinksWine]

Christopher Nolan’s 30 favourite films of all time:

1) 2001: A Space Odyssey (1968, Kubrick)

2) 12 Angry Men (1957, Lumet)

3) Alien (1979, Scott)

4) All Quiet on the Western Front (1930, Milestone)

5) Bad Timing (1980, Roeg)

6) The Battle of Algiers (1966, Pontecorvo)

7) Blade Runner (1982, Scott)

8) Close Encounters of the Third Kind (1978, Spielberg)

9) First Man (2018, Chazelle)

10) For All Mankind (1989, Reinert)

11) Foreign Correspondent (1940, Hitchcock)

12) Greed (1924, Stroheim)

13) The Hit (1984, Frears)

14) Koyaanisqatsi (1983, Reggio)

15) Lawrence of Arabia (1962, Lean)

16) Merry Christmas Mr. Lawrence (1983, Oshima)

17) Metropolis (1927, Lang)

18) Mr. Arkadin – (1955, Welles)

19) The Right Stuff (1983, Kaufman)

20) Saving Private Ryan (1988, Spielberg)

21) The Spy Who Loved Me (1977,Gilbert)

22) Ryan’s Daughter (1970, Lean)

23) Star Wars (1977, Lucas)

24) Street of Crocodiles (1986, The Brothers Quay)

25) Sunrise (1927, Murnau)

26) Superman: The Movie (1978, Donner)

27) The Testament of Dr. Mabuse (1933, Lang)

28) The Thin Red Line (Malick, 1988)

29) Topkapi (1964, Dassin)

30) The Tree of Life (2011, Malick)

("Christopher Nolan’s 30 favourite movies of all time", Jack Whatley, Far out Magazine, 2024)

[Marlow @marlowxbt]

Chinese dev posted on a Telegram coding group: Need someone to test my BTC sniper script. Will pay $500 for 48 hours of runtime on your machine.

Nobody replied. The script looked sketchy. No documentation. Variables in Mandarin. One file. 47 lines.

One guy in the group downloaded it anyway. Ran it on his old ThinkPad. Forgot about it.

Two days later he opened the laptop to watch YouTube. Terminal was still running. Green text scrolling.

He checked the wallet the script was connected to.

Demphu.finite. $91,599 profit. 65 predictions. Joined February 2026.

→ Wallet: https://t.co/dV4s4m7olX

65 trades. February 14 and 15 only. Then the script stopped itself.

BTC dropped 4% on Valentine's Day. The script caught every move. Bought the lag between Binance and the platform. 65 times. Then auto killed.

He messaged the dev: Your script made $91K. Where's my $500?

Dev replied in Mandarin. Google Translate: Script wasn't supposed to trade real money. Was testing latency. Send wallet address, I'll send your cut.

He sent the address. Got $9,100. Ten percent.

Dev extracted the rest. $82,499. Wallet dark. $0.00.

335 people have ever seen this wallet. The dev deleted his Telegram account the next day.

The guy still has the script on his ThinkPad. 47 lines. Variables he can't read. A function called 执行 that he had to Google. It means execute.

He tried running it again the next week. Nothing happened. BTC was flat. The script needs volatility above 3% to trigger.

It just sits there. Waiting for the next crash. 47 lines of Mandarin that made $91K in two days on a laptop that can barely run Chrome.

The dev is gone. The wallet is empty. The script is still on his desktop. He opens it sometimes. Reads the characters he doesn't understand. Waits.

[The Curious Tales @thecurioustales]

🚨The most dangerous discovery of the decade no is paying attention to.

Scientists just figured out how to put thoughts inside your head while you sleep.

Every waking thought you have can be observed, inferred, tracked, or manipulated. Your attention is sold to algorithms. Your emotional state is nudged by notification timing. Your beliefs are shaped by what gets amplified in your feed and what gets quietly buried. But the six to eight hours you spend unconscious every night — the strange, illogical, emotionally charged theater your brain runs while you sleep — that has always been yours alone. No advertiser could reach it. No government could audit it. No one could touch what happened behind your closed eyes.

Northwestern just opened a door into that space.

The mechanism they used is called Targeted Memory Reactivation. During REM sleep — the stage where vivid, narrative dreaming happens — the brain is running at near-waking electrical activity levels. The visual cortex fires. The emotional centers light up. The prefrontal cortex, which governs rational judgment and critical thinking, goes almost completely offline. What remains is a highly activated, emotionally receptive, logic-free processing environment. Researchers played specific sound cues associated with particular concepts or experiences that subjects had been exposed to before sleep. The brain, hearing those cues in REM, incorporated the associated concepts directly into the dream narrative.

The dreamers weren't just passively receiving signals. Their brains were actively building stories around the planted seeds.

To understand why this is significant at a deeper level than "scientists can influence dreams," you have to understand what dreams actually are in the architecture of human cognition. The dominant neuroscientific framework right now treats dreaming not as random noise or mystical experience, but as the brain's nightly simulation engine — a threat rehearsal and emotional processing system that evolved precisely because running dangerous scenarios in a consequence-free environment gave our ancestors survival advantages. You dream about being chased because the motor patterns, fear responses, and escape strategies you rehearse while unconscious transfer to waking readiness. You dream about social conflict because the emotional calibration that happens during those dream sequences fine-tunes your actual social responses the next day.

Dreams are not a side effect of sleep. They are an active update process for the self.

Which means planting an idea in a dream is not like whispering something to a sleeping person and hoping they absorb it passively. It is inserting a concept directly into the brain's most powerful self-modification cycle — the same process that determines which emotional memories get strengthened, which fears get rehearsed into phobias, which desires get amplified, and which beliefs get woven into identity.

The brain doesn't tag dream experiences as external. It processes them as lived experience. When you wake from an emotionally intense dream, your amygdala doesn't know the difference between something that happened and something you vividly simulated. The physiological arousal is real. The memory trace is real. The emotional residue that colors your next waking hours is real. Fear of flying after a crash dream. Residual warmth toward someone you dreamed about. Inexplicable dread on a morning after a nightmare you can't fully recall.

If a sound cue can direct the brain toward a specific concept during that process, whoever controls the cue library controls what emotional weight gets attached to what ideas during the most uncritical, most receptive, most identity-forming cognitive state the brain ever enters.

The therapeutic applications are genuinely extraordinary. PTSD treatment that doesn't require the conscious re-experiencing of trauma — instead, the brain processes the traumatic memory in REM while sound cues nudge the narrative toward resolution rather than re-traumatization. Phobia extinction during sleep. Addiction interruption by interfering with craving-associated dream content that reinforces substance-seeking behavior the next day. Depression treatment that targets the well-documented phenomenon of negative dream rumination — the way severely depressed patients dream in loops of failure, loss, and worthlessness that worsen waking mood rather than restoring it.

The distance between those applications and the darker ones is uncomfortably short.

The advertising industry has been trying to reach people's unconscious minds since the Freudian revolution of the early 20th century. Every brand strategy, every jingle designed to loop involuntarily through your mind, every emotional association carefully engineered between a product and a feeling — these are blunt-force attempts at unconscious influence using only waking-state access. The moment sleep becomes a viable channel, the commercial incentive to occupy it becomes enormous. Sleep-adjacent audio delivery already exists — there are entire industries around sleep podcasts, white noise machines, guided meditations that play through the night. The infrastructure for delivering sound during sleep is already normalized and in millions of homes.

Nobody consented to having their dreams shaped when they put on their sleep headphones.

And then there is the political dimension, which deserves to be stated plainly. The most effective propaganda doesn't change what people think. It changes what people feel, because feelings generate thoughts faster than thoughts generate feelings. A population that consistently dreams about certain threats, certain enemies, certain inadequacies is a population whose emotional threat landscape gets calibrated toward those targets every single morning before they've had a single conscious thought. Ancient rulers understood that controlling the interpretation of dreams was a form of political power — oracles, priests, and dream readers operated at the intersection of unconscious experience and social control for thousands of years. They just didn't have the neuroscience to do it at scale.

The last truly sovereign territory in human experience is the mind that exists when the socially constructed self goes offline.

Northwestern just showed that territory has coordinates.

What happens next depends almost entirely on whether the people who understand this move slower or faster than the people who want to monetize it.

[ℏεsam @Hesamation]

bro really dropped a 12 hour video on how computers work from scratch.

[Discover @0x_Discover]

🚨 BREAKING — one of the strongest OpenClaw setups on Polymarket just went public.

A trader reportedly turned ~$100–200 into ~$3.7M.

No insider info.
No political connections.
Just automation built with OpenClaw.

Profile →
https://t.co/yq1RRAY9cR

Copytrade →https://t.co/GNQBeFgIre

I spent several hours digging through the framework.
What surprised me the most:

There’s no massive infrastructure.
No complex quant systems.
No giant data pipelines.
Just clean logic + disciplined automation.

After analyzing it, the strategy basically comes down to three core ideas.

1) Farming “free money” with NO positions

The bot targets outcomes with near-zero probability.
Instead of chasing big wins, it stacks thousands of small, high-probability NO trades.
Not gambling — systematic probability harvesting.

2) Logical arbitrage

Sometimes Outcome A implies Outcome B, but markets don’t adjust instantly.

The bot detects these inconsistencies and enters before repricing happens.

By the time news spreads, the opportunity is already gone.

3) Retail-driven inefficiencies

Sports and political markets are dominated by emotional retail traders.

Prices overshoot.
Spreads widen.
Inefficiencies appear constantly.

The bot simply clips those small edges again and again.

Scale is the real edge.

📊 4,192 trades executed

Individually small.

Together they compounded into ~$3.7M profit.

Largest single win: $1,464,152.
The equity curve is almost vertical.
This isn’t about predicting events.

It’s about exploiting structural inefficiencies faster than the crowd.

[Trung Phan @TrungTPhan]

The full video from Cortical Labs explaining how they put 200,000 brain cells onto a silicon chip and had it play Doom is wild:

“When a demon appears on the left of the screen, specific electrodes stimulate the sensory area of the neural culture on the left side. The neurons react to that stimulation. We then listen to their response, the spikes, and interpret that activity as motor commands. If the neurons fire in a specific pattern, the Doom guy shoots.”

[Massimo @Rainmaker1973]

This glass stores nearly 5 terabytes of data in a coaster-sized slab, needs no power to maintain it.

[📹 rowancheung]

[Massimo @Rainmaker1973]

CRISPR deleted the extra chromosome behind Down syndrome.

In a groundbreaking world-first, researchers have successfully used CRISPR gene-editing technology to remove the extra chromosome responsible for Down syndrome, opening a potential path toward treating genetic disorders previously considered incurable.

Down syndrome, or trisomy 21, occurs when a person has three copies of chromosome 21 instead of the usual two. It is one of the most common genetic conditions, affecting about 1 in 700 babies worldwide, and leads to intellectual disability, developmental delays, and various health issues. Until now, no treatment has been able to correct the underlying cause.

That may soon change.

In a new proof-of-concept study, scientists applied CRISPR-Cas9 to cells taken from people with Down syndrome—including skin cells and pluripotent stem cells—and successfully eliminated the extra chromosome 21. The edited cells showed a striking return to normal gene expression patterns and cellular function. To improve precision, the team briefly disabled certain DNA-repair pathways during the process, making the chromosome removal cleaner and more effective.

At this stage, the technique has only been demonstrated in laboratory cell cultures and is far from ready for human use. Removing an entire chromosome carries significant risks, including possible off-target effects, so extensive safety work lies ahead. If those challenges can be overcome, however, the approach could one day be applied to brain cells or even used during early fetal development.

The implications extend beyond Down syndrome. The same strategy might eventually treat other life-limiting trisomies, such as trisomy 13 and trisomy 18, which are often fatal in infancy or cause severe disability. For the first time, a tool exists that could, in principle, correct the root chromosomal abnormality rather than merely managing symptoms.

["Trisomic rescue via allele-specific multiple chromosome cleavage using CRISPR-Cas9 in trisomy 21 cells." PNAS Nexus, 2025]

[Lukas Ziegler @lukas_m_ziegler]

stumbled on something surprising in a Morgan Stanley report 👀

now you know what it takes to produce humanoids

[Jakub Kosikowski @kosik_md]

Droga opinio publiczna

Będzie długo, ale chcę wam pokazać jak Was się robi w bambuko i próbuje wam wkręcić, że obniżenie pensji pielęgniarkom czy ratownikom jest dla waszego dobra

Zapraszam do wąteczku

Od 2022 roku wiadomo, że budżet NFZ w latach 2024-2027 czekają ciężkie czasy

Dziwnym trafem mimo to sytuacja ta zaskoczyła drogowców i zaczęło się gorączkowe szukanie kasy, bo nagle dotarło, że w 2025 zabraknie 14, a w 2026 23+ miliardów złotych (plus bo dojdzie tyle ile zabraknie w 2025)

Od sasa do lasa czytacie o tym, że winne są rozpasane pensje lekarzy, którzy zjadają pieniądze, które możnaby wydać na leczenie Polaków, a tak to nie ma, bo konowały zjadły. A no i pielęgniarki nagle zarabiają najwięcej w Europie, bo 160% średniej pensji (każdy kto ma jakiekolwiek pojęcie o tym wie, że pielęgniarki w PL nie zarabiają średnio 13k podstawy, ale niech będzie)

Najlepiej się klikają newsy typu kardiolog z Konina z 200k miesięcznie, czy neurochirurdzy ze szpitala MZ z pensjami 300k/msc

No więc od 2 lat klepany jest wszędzie w mediach temat, że czas zamrozić ustawę, której jestem jednym z ojców, ustawę którą wywalczyli rezydenci i inne zawody medyczne z porozumienia zawodów medycznych w 2018 roku. Ustawę o pensjach minimalnych w ochronie zdrowia

Nie wiem ilu z Was wie jak wygląda płacenie pensji w ochronie zdrowia. To nie jest tak, że jest kupka na pensje, kupka na leki i kupka na operacje. Szpital sprzedaje NFZ usługę leczenie, NFZ za to płaci już po wyleczeniu pacjenta i dopiero z tego przychodu szpital płaci pensje. Więc każda złotówka wypłacona personelowi najpierw "była zapłatą za leczenie pacjenta"

Więc jeśli zamrozimy pensje pielęgniarkom, nie oznacza to, że mniej wydamy na ich pensje i więcej zostanie NFZ na leczenie. NFZ za to leczenie będzie dalej płacił tyle samo, po prostu szpital będzie mieć lepszy wynik finansowy. By NFZ mogło kupić więcej wizyt potrzebna jest w sumie reforma, na którą się nie zanosi, bo za duże ryzyko polityczne :) Więc ta zmiana tylko poprawi tabelki w excelu i osłabi popularność zawodów medycznych wśród studentów

Dwa, mamy deficyty kadrowe w NFZ w zawodach medycznych (bo prywatnie zazwyczaj od ręki, z wyjątkami typu psych dziecięcy). Gro absolwentek pielęgniarstwa w ogóle nie odbierało prawa wykonywania zawodu, nie mówiąc już o podjęciu pracy w szpitalach. Dzięki tej ustawie, która po latach upokorzeń oderwała ich pensje od minimalnej krajowej udało się spowodować, że pielęgniarstwo to popularne studia, a w szpitalach pojawiły się młodsze odemnie pielęgniarki

Zamrożenie im pensji, ratownikom, diagnostom, technikom, sekretarkom itd nie spowoduje, że NFZ zostanie więcej na leczenie bo nadal za wyrostek zapłaci tyle co płacił

Dziura finansowa NFZ od tego nie zniknie. Różnica jest taka, że mniej osób wybierze ten kierunek, co przy naszej demografii kopnie nas w dupę ze zdwojoną siłą

A lekarze? Na etacie, których ma dotyczyć mrożenie jest 30% lekarzy specjalistów. Jakieś 15% zarabia tą minimalną. Reszta albo zarabia więcej, albo jest na b2b i ich to ograniczenie pensji na etatach nie dotknie wcale. Więc w imię walczenia z pensją 100k, nie zmieni się nic w kwestii wynagrodzeń lekarza zarabiającego 100k

Co można zrobić, żeby w NFZ było lepiej? Dać im pieniądze, by kupili dla was więcej operacji, więcej wizyt u kardiologa itd. Skąd się biorą kolejki? No bo NFZ nie ma tyle kasy, by kupić tyle wizyt czy operacji, ilu Polaków w danym roku choruje. Stąd limituje to kolejkami

U nas podwyżka składki zdrowotnej nie wchodzi w grę bo polityka, na razie się skupiono na tym, by zrobić dobrze dyrektorom kosztem personelowi tłumacząc to "dobrem pacjenta". Nie wiem co zmieni w sytuacji pacjentów, kiedy będziemy kupować nadal mniej wizyt niż potrzeba, za to pielęgniarek będzie mniej. Bo jedyne z czego się w PL rozlicza dyrektora to wynik finansowy szpitala (a nie czy dobrze leczy, ma mało zakażeń itd)

Czechy to dobry przykład ochrony zdrowia, sektor prywatny prawie nie istnieje, lekarze na UOP zarabiają więcej niż w Polsce, nie ma kontraktów. Gdzie haczyk? Oni więcej wydają na publiczną ochronę zdrowia, niż my na publiczną i prywatną razem wzięte

Co z lekarzami? My sobie poradzimy, do porzygu, nikt z was nie będzie czekać, aż kardiolog go przyjmie za pół roku jak mu się coś dzieje, tylko pójdzie prywatnie. Dla większości z nas im gorzej w NFZ, tym lepsze zarobki prywatnie. Sorry, ale żaden szpital nie może konkurować z 4 pacjentami po 300zł za 15h z czego my dostaniemy połowę. Jedyny sposób, to wyciąć konkurencję sektora prywatnego. A jak to zrobić? Kupować tyle świadczeń, by nikt nie był zmuszony iść prywatnie albo wcale

Dlatego jak piszcie, że lekarze chcą tylko kasy, to w sumie się sam do siebie śmieję, że mamy najlepszych obrońców naszych interesów na świecie. Bo w moim finansowym interesie jest totalna zapaść NFZ. Niska składka zdrowotna. Byście musieli kupić u mnie wizytę, bo się na NFZ nie dopchacie. Finansowy koszmar, to wtedy kiedy każdy z was się może dostać na leczenie bez problemów

Dlatego nie dajcie się robić w bambuko. To, że zamrożą pensję ratownikom nie spowoduje, że będziecie mieć mniejsze kolejki. To tylko temat zastępczy, by zrzucić na personel, że system nie działa, a wy musicie się do niego wpychać z prywaty by przeżyć

Lekarze sobie poradzą, nabory x2,5 w ostatnich latach pewnie osłabią presje płacową w prywacie, później w NFZ. Tyle, że to nie spowoduje, że NFZ będzie mieć więcej wizyt dla was. Szpitale będą miały lepszy wynik finansowy

To wam teraz próbują wcisnąć, że w waszym interesie jest by ludzie przestali wybierać pielęgniarstwo, ratownictwo, fizjoterapię

Pozdrawiam tych co dotrwali do końca wątku i wszystkich co razem ze mną walczyli o ustawę o pensjach minimalnych, którą teraz rząd chce uwalić licząc, że suweren będzie krzyczał z radości "bo dowalili bogatym lekarzom" i przestanie pytać dlaczego dalej rehabilitacja na pilnie jest za pół roku, albo prywatnie

[Xavi Ruiz @xruiztru]

Percentage of monthly income needed to rent 100m2 by European region.

[Bryan Johnson @bryan_johnson]

A new longevity stem cell therapy in monkeys showed an estimated 3–5 yrs of biological age reversal, across 54% of tissues. Scaled cautiously to humans, could correspond to ~9–15 years of rejuvenation.

If this replicates, it's a big deal. 🧵

[I @olko_i]

@cice_jess @BinghamtonDaily Come to Motion Club today for a good music

[I @olko_i]

@CurtisMeredithh Come to Motion Club today for a good music

[I @olko_i]

@Scott_Gr87 @ChelseaFC Come to Motion Club today for a good music