@ZackKorman Trying to anticipate with certainty what something more intelligent will do is an extreme assessment.
Saying “this seems unpredictable and therefore scary” is the less extreme assessment.
@BedoyaUSA 2) What is the police going to do? The entire idea is that AI advancements are inevitable on a global scale. Look at everybody arguing. We don’t even agree on if there is civilisational risk -> someone will continue building it -> try to be first and try to make it safer
@BedoyaUSA 1) Those are not a lot of events. Assuming 10% for each of these… the expected result would be that civilisation would still be around…
But of course some events have a higher chance than others …
@fcbjamal1 When a team creates high-quality fast-break chances, those shots should already have higher xG. If they were “all good chances” the xG should reflect that.
The fact that they had more accurate shots is the coincidence.
@freshjiva Yeah it has turned out to have the economic structure of a Ponzi scheme.
but Ponzi schemes are not transparent and don’t provide value
Also the state can more flexibly handle future obligations
@WallStreetApes You still have to give your signature when voting and it is compared to the signature for your registration.
Isnt that enough identification?
He often openly and intentionally just trades hype for a few weeks.
So his reasoning wasn’t necessarily flawed!
He is specifically saying it doesn’t matter if they actually become TSLA 2.0 - meaning their 2024 delivery numbers are irrelevant. @WR4NYGov
https://t.co/0f4l7flPe1
Be careful who you listen to when evaluating companies and stocks
This was Chris in January 2021, pumping Lucid Motors
Lucid delivered 10,000 cars in 2024
Tesla delivers 40,000 cars a week
@everyvote_prize@ChrisCamillo Some things are worth it to be purpose built. Some things aren’t. With time it will shift towards the former. But for now there are so many applications where purpose built machines are not worth it.
@everyvote_prize@ChrisCamillo There is a reason why we don’t have a purpose built machine for every task. They are costly to develop, inflexible to process changes, and impractical (too many at home). General robots however are scalable and flexible so that you can consistently/quasi instantly provide value.
@MagicBerryInc@Tuggernutz87 But you said it was good for “protecting shareholders”. Even though the judge may or may not have been legally justified to do it this is clearly against the shareholders will.
You are kind of talking past each other here.
@jasondebolt@joeroganhq Wtf? Of course he should go on. Everyone tells lies or says some bullshit here or there. He should treat him like everyone else. It’s not like he invaded a country?
Even if he says some lies the internet will talk about it.
Light is the best disinfectant.
@Elite_89@wholemars Yes isn’t that so true? If they actually roll it out in some small capacity the potential will really sink in and wallstreet ect will invest.
If investing in the stock is better than this then the probability of yes will be artificially low? So its even higher than 40%