Aarish Patel

[Aarish Patel @pacha75]

@Gill_Gross @jmgmoron este análisis de GG en su último vídeo es muy interesante para vosotros: la media de altura del backhand de sinner contra medvedev era 90cm y contra ruud 177cm

[Aarish Patel @pacha75]

@chan2pa Seems like a clear case for Optimus standard and Optimus plus

[Chan2Pa @chan2pa]

https://t.co/LIY3n4agfr

[Jmail @jmailarchive]

We built Jikipedia, a new wiki that compiles Jmail data into exhaustive reports on key figures in the Epstein scandal.

It lists all recorded visits to Epstein's estates, each person's possible knowledge of Epstein's crimes and laws that they may have violated.

Here is Epstein's executive assistant, who sent >100k emails to him and was shielded from prison via a 2007 non-prosecution deal.

[Champagne Joshi @JoshWalkos]

That’s a lot of emails.

[Aarish Patel @pacha75]

@mikehunt211H Their target is to ramp up Eagle. That’s what OEMs want - read my post on what Honda said which is exactly that. Once it is ramped up (target 1) licenses will come (target 2). Good or bad? Normal. Not bad. Remember Tesla’s production hell? Once solved stock will fly. $QS

[Aarish Patel @pacha75]

$QS is not in the habit of missing targets. You are not in you are risking stock re-rating when it is announced

[Aarish Patel @pacha75]

$QS In QS 2026 target terms:

Target 1 → Target 2

Target 1: Prove scalable production
(Eagle ramp, yield, productivity)

Target 2: Licensing + monetisation

Research phase is over, Honda is waiting.

If Target 1 lands, Target 2 follows.

Scale is the catalyst. All by year end.

[Aarish Patel @pacha75]

@QuantumScapeInc I don’t lie, I infer.
Read this: https://t.co/RichddNUXV

[Aarish Patel @pacha75]

$QS 1/2 Honda said it plainly last year:
“Technology only becomes valuable when it is mass-produced.”
Now that Honda is essentially confirmed as a JDA partner, their priority is obvious: SCALE.
Honda must believe the process is:
• Stable
• Economically viable
Scale is the gate

[YeahDave @Yeah_Dave]

$QS Earnings
Solid-state batteries

A lot of great news the market is ignoring:

Partners. The two new partners are Honda and Nissan (in addition to VW). The market is being lazy and not reacting simply because $QS did not verbatim say this sentence in big bold letters.

Final Stretch. In 10 months they designed, commissioned, and built out a fully automated robotic manufacturing line. It doesn't just mass produce sample batteries, the manufacturing line is a product in itself. Once they refine the automation, VW (Audi/Porsche), Honda, and Nissan will be the ones mass-producing it.

Expansion. Confirmed expansion into drones, robotics, data centers, aviation, and defense.

This technology has been years in the making with billions in R&D. It is no longer Sci-Fi. The batteries work. They are the essential missing piece for the autonomous and robotic future that is rapidly unfolding.

All that is left is to prove it can be mass manufactured efficiently and at a competitive cost. That will take another quarter or two to refine, but the market is being impatient.

Here is a video on why I find $QS interesting:
https://t.co/c8eRTYtijg

[Aarish Patel @pacha75]

@v88man We don’t. But the pic of the Honda person is in the SH letter and they are referred to as customers

[Aarish Patel @pacha75]

$QS In QS 2026 target terms:

Target 1 → Target 2

Target 1: Prove scalable production
(Eagle ramp, yield, productivity)

Target 2: Licensing + monetisation

Research phase is over, Honda is waiting.

If Target 1 lands, Target 2 follows.

Scale is the catalyst. All by year end.

[Aarish Patel @pacha75]

@Budweisendawg @QuantumScapeCo @chan2pa QS’ inline metrology inspects the separator continuously and ejects defective segments upstream. That means scrap exists — but bad material never becomes a finished cell.

Shipped cell yield can be ~100% even if material yield isn’t.

Big difference. Look it up.

[Aarish Patel @pacha75]

@ASTSmob $qs QS’ inline metrology inspects the separator continuously and ejects defective segments upstream. That means scrap exists — but bad material never becomes a finished cell.

Shipped cell yield can be ~100% even if material yield isn’t.

Big difference.

[Kevin Chen @Defiantclient2]

$QS: @DigatronPower confirms @QuantumScapeCo has transitioned from breakthrough innovation to scalable, product-focused manufacturing. 🤝

https://t.co/2WRmqhehyy

[Aarish Patel @pacha75]

@Budweisendawg @ASTSmob @Defiantclient2 @QuantumScapeCo @chan2pa And he is entitled to have it!

[Aarish Patel @pacha75]

@BatteryBoy507 @ccmobilian @Stvcarell B samples were already sent last year. B0 and B1 post cobra. The fact that Eagle was baselined doesn't mean the B sample changed. They've had good number of B samples since way before Ducati B1's (which used 980 cells)

[Aarish Patel @pacha75]

@Budweisendawg @ASTSmob @Defiantclient2 @QuantumScapeCo Because I studied their blogs and videos on metrology

[Aarish Patel @pacha75]

@ASTSmob @Defiantclient2 @QuantumScapeCo Mate. Yield is 100%: their metrology discards the defective parts along the way. So OEMs can use 99.9% of what comes out. If you’re talking of what’s lost along the way then it is a matter of tweaking over time.

[Aarish Patel @pacha75]

@CharlesNiblick Don’t think so. Eagle is a blueprint: they could also build super eagles for example.

[Aarish Patel @pacha75]

$QS 1/2 Final thought on Eagle: Siva said customers would be invited. We see Nissan engineers on site. OEMs don’t send engineers to tour pilot lines unless they’re customers. Engineers verify baselines, not clap. Looks less like PR, more like customer baseline confirmation.