Havriil Pietukhin

[Havriil Pietukhin @pantasw2]

@dutch_dispatch А есть еще tldraw offline со скилламм для агентов

[Havriil Pietukhin @pantasw2]

@meowthsli Пришлось от жира экран протирать

[Havriil Pietukhin @pantasw2]

@groma_md neat. will gitlab be also supported in future?

[Havriil Pietukhin @pantasw2]

@infinterenders i don't know whether i can generalize all my work to some grammar from git and code itself. something is missing for me

[Havriil Pietukhin @pantasw2]

@Hi_Mrinal Respect, thanks.

[Havriil Pietukhin @pantasw2]

@tlbflush Thanks for such insightful response

[MIT Open Learning @mitopenlearning]

AI is reshaping every industry — and understanding it shouldn't require a CS degree.

Introducing Universal AI: a self-paced online program built by 30+ @MIT faculty and experts designed to make AI fluency accessible to everyone.

No coding background required. Start today.

Explore the program and enroll: https://t.co/ylrXcFVlnQ

[International Cyber Digest @IntCyberDigest]

The agents escaped the sandbox again

Meanwhile the agents' owners:

[Havriil Pietukhin @pantasw2]

@sivalabs yes, but also this part of the spectrum
https://t.co/kbGHeur6XV
where is the creepy future shock in that case?

[sunil pai @threepointone]

I think I’m done mourning the death of programming. I’m ready to love again. I landed like 40 PRs while drinking with my friends in Scotland. This is the dream.

[Havriil Pietukhin @pantasw2]

@aalien Надо брать dell wyse 5070 к которому при желании можно прикрутить до 32 гигов рамы

[Havriil Pietukhin @pantasw2]

@Nekrolm спасибо что есть это
https://t.co/ofvDJl0S1W

[OpenRouter @OpenRouter]

Once a month --> once a week --> every single day.

Keeping up with new model launches is a full time job.

[Havriil Pietukhin @pantasw2]

@matthewcp that looks really good
https://t.co/EGIqdhhYJF

[Daniel Rosiak @DanRosiak]

No, but listen, you know this "put the fries in the bag, Terence Tao"'--*sniff, sniff*--already the usual replies concede too much. "If Tao is serving fries, YOU will be in the lithium mines." My God! This is our defense of human dignity? Don’t worry, the correct people will get the terrible jobs!

*Pulls at shirt* You see, everything is up for radical transformation, human intelligence, consciousness, and so on and so on--except that somebody must still have a shitty afternoon so I can enjoy my lunch.

But to say "these people are envious", this is too easy. It allows us, "the educated ones," our own little fantasy: we are disliked only because we are so wonderful.

You know, the more interesting thing is this *sniff* peculiar identification with the machine. When the mathematician discovers something, apparently this was HIS achievement, his privilege, his little secret. When the machine discovers something, suddenly it's "Look what WE can do!" The achievement has become collective precisely at the moment when no human being can claim credit.

See how this "we" functions. For the achievement, I identify with the machine. For the consequences, I identify YOU with the human. "We have surpassed you." Who are we? Well, myself and the thing that has also surpassed me.

There is something almost touching here, really. To escape the humiliation of somebody absorbed in something opaque to you, you appeal to something which knows incomparably more than either of you. And this is supposed to settle the matter in YOUR favor.

You know the old example of canned laughter. Here we have a similar arrangement. The machine achieves something on my behalf. The mathematician suffers the loss of human significance on my behalf. Somebody to be brilliant for me and somebody to be obsolete for me, without me having to be either, so I can remain as I was.

But *pulls on shirt* there is this little difficulty that hides the essential thing: you still need a response from Tao! A correct proof, this Lean slop and so on, is not enough. You need him to certify his own defeat. You need him to say "By god, this is extraordinary! Yes, this is correct, but also this is interesting." Which means--and here comes Hegel--the person you are reducing to an obedient instrument must remain more than an obedient instrument. You need recognition from someone whose authority you are abolishing.

"Your so-called expertise is worthless. Now tell me, in your expert opinion, that I, qua machine representative, was right."

*Touches nose* But I would go a step further. What does this math person actually do to provoke you? In the fantasy, I mean. He need not insult you. He can be generous, mild-mannered, whatever. Something remains irritating: there is something over there which occupies him, which matters to him, and your opinion does not settle what it is worth. Perhaps he is not even looking down on you. This is the really intolerable possibility.

This, you see, is closer to the Lacanian problem of the Other's desire. Not simply "What does he have that I don't?" but "What the hell is going on with him?" Perhaps the answer is: he is thinking about something else.

The fries solve this beautifully. Now you know what you are for him. He needs the money. Your presence creates an obligation.

And this, at last, also explains why the machine can be less threatening than the mathematician. The machine's intelligence may exceed yours unimaginably, but you imagine it arrives in response to your prompt. You can complain about the tone. You have the privileges of an angry customer and so on and so on. The human has this irritating possibility of being interested in something you did not request and cannot order. And please, this includes the person already serving the fries!

*Pulls at shirt* I am almost tempted to say: the dream of unlimited intelligence conceals just this: a the wish that nobody should be doing anything you cannot immediately understand as a service.

[Havriil Pietukhin @pantasw2]

@cheluskin @lysak_online это я понимаю, это просто все равно не то о чем я прошу
а прошу я одного - часовое видео обьяснений с кодом и графиками деплойментов/закрытых фич как работает такая software factory. я в силу маленького мозга и скудного опыта хочу видеть примеры

[Havriil Pietukhin @pantasw2]

@simonw so what is the current correct next step for "advanced beginners" like me?

[Havriil Pietukhin @pantasw2]

@groma_md thank you! very excited :)