@disruptfascism Shall we eliminate the anti-trust exemption too?
What do you think would happen if a competing league set up and said part of the contract was players would not be billboards for any kind of "night"?
@RoKhanna What do you mean by better?
Aren't those same protections in Canadian health care where necessary treatment is delayed by months while being offered euthanasia instead of care?
@clintbuckingham But the iconography is in itself, a blasephous use of a rainbow. If the symbol was an upside down cross, would you see the issue? Or perhaps a group mocking nuns?
The Rangers have the right idea. There is nothing to be gained by insulting the players on your team.
@robthemany@TorenTYlfa@legaltweetz They really don't. Participation grew over time. When the mother's day stuff started the players weren't involved at all. A few players did the bats and socks, batting gloves, etc for charity auction, but that came latter. The only forced participation is the gay stuff.
@Average02200657@CydZeigler On a night like that, there would be no uniform change. It's only gay nights where players are forced to wear political symbols.
@omahagloyd@CydZeigler@outsports Perhaps the problem is forcing players to display a political message they don't agree with. Perhaps teams (and the league) should stop trying to force political opinions on players.
@Ronindrake2@deuceohsixx I don't know about you but in my area, fast food (except dairy queen) is staffed by old people. The kiosks exist but not in smaller cities and towns yet.
@RobWyman@deuceohsixx They won't be there soon enough. I don't want them to keep that job. I want that job available as a stepping stone into the workforce. To do something useful, vote against minimum wage laws, higher taxes, illegal aliens, everything that makes those jobs disappear.