MY BOT NEVER BUYS A COIN BEFORE IT'S 88% DONE. IT STILL TURNED $750 INTO $4,620 IN ONE AFTERNOON
9 trades, $750 to start, $3,870.62 profit, 6.16x on the budget
everyone fights over the first 10% of a launch
my bot only wants the last 10%
it watches 6 bonding curves at once. when a clean coin fills to 88%, it asks me if it can buy. then it holds through graduation and sells into the migration pump
19:56, $YUMMY at 88% curve, 412 real buyers, dev 0.6%. approved $250. graduated, sold 4.1x at 20:16, net +$763.45
20:31, $GRADDY hits 88%. 530 real buyers, dev 0.4%. approved $300
20:44, GRADUATED → raydium
20:51, sold into the migration pump. 5.6x, net +$1,361.90
and 2 curves it refused to touch:
15:40, $WASHY. one wallet made 64% of the buys to fake the fill. killed
18:00, $DUMPTRK. dev sitting on 22%, unlocked, waiting for grad to dump. killed
by 21:00: 9 graduations caught, average +$430.07, 2 fake curves killed, 0 rugs eaten
six agents. the bot can spend exactly $0
curve watches the fill speed. wash checks who's really buying. rug checks the dev. snipe gets in at 88% in 0.3s. ledger books every cent
the only button that moves money is mine
sold $5,668, bought $1,730, fees and jito tips -$68.38
i never bought a launch. i bought graduations
built by RUGIKK
EVERYONE TRIED TO GET RICH ON AI BY BUYING NVIDIA. I MADE $48,300 FROM AI WITHOUT OWNING A SINGLE AI STOCK
here's the trade nobody on my feed was talking about
every AI data center is a building that eats electricity. one big campus can pull as much power as a small city. and it has to sign for that power years before it opens
so i stopped asking "which AI company wins" and started asking "who do they all have to pay?"
i gave the question to 3 agents:
→ HAIKU 5.5 read every US utility, power producer and grid supplier filing. 10-Ks, 10-Qs, 8-Ks, earnings calls. every mention of "data center", "large load", "interconnection"
→ JEV sorted it. one question per company: is this demand signed, with a number, or just talk on a call? it can't write a single word, it only picks. talk got thrown out
→ OPUS 5.5 read only the survivors and wrote one page each: how much of next year's demand is already under contract, and what the stock price assumes. it never saw the chart first
out of 140+ companies, 6 made it through. i bought 4
7 months later:
→ 3 of them up between 31% and 64%
→ 1 down 11%. sold it. the contract got delayed
→ net: +$48,300
i didn't predict anything. the agents just read what was already signed while everyone else watched nvidia's chart
in a gold rush, don't guess who finds gold. read who's selling the shovels
the prompt i used ↓
"Build me a research desk in this folder. Read-only, no brokerage.
1. Reader (haiku): pull the latest 10-K, 10-Q, 8-K and call transcript for every US utility and power producer from SEC EDGAR. Save every mention of data centers, large loads or interconnection with the number and a source link.
2. Gate (jev): for each company ask "is this demand signed, with a contract and a number?" Keep only scores above 0.85.
3. Analyst (opus, never opens prices): one page per survivor: signed demand vs current capacity, what has to go right, the one fact that would kill the idea.
4. Code adds the stock move last. Show me the agent files first. Nothing runs until I say go."
THIS IS A PURE F*CKING DIAMOND
Anthropic just documented one of the best setups for Claude Code
The idea: run Opus 5.5, Sonnet 5.5, and the new Haiku 5.5 together in a tight tripartite loop, each doing only what it was built for
Opus-level planning on every big architectural decision, without paying Opus rates for routine code edits or repo searches
You just start Claude Code like this:
CLAUDE_CODE_SUBAGENT_MODEL=haiku claude --model opusplan
here's how it splits:
→ Opus 5.5 runs plan mode: architects the system blueprint, locks contracts, and signs off on the diff
→ Sonnet 5.5 executes the plan in the main session: writes the code, applies patches, and runs test suites
→ Haiku 5.5 swarms the repository in parallel: maps the AST, greps call sites, and parses docs at 340 tok/s with native 1M context
→ you stop burning Opus context on routine files and keep your main session under 10k tokens
Opus only steps in at three moments:
→ before a plan locks (architectural design)
→ when the same test fails twice (debugging deadlocks)
→ before calling it done (signing off on git diff)
Opus plans, Sonnet builds, Haiku swarms
JEV engineering is the same move one layer down: the forks that need no thinker (which file, which tool, retry or stop) resolve in code in 15ms, and the frontier models only see the ones that split
the full tree
> Opus 5.5 architects the implementation plan (opusplan mode)
> Sonnet 5.5 runs the main execution session and writes code
> search maps the repo AST on Haiku 5.5 (340 tok/s, 1M context)
> grep locates token call sites on Haiku 5.5 (isolated subagent)
> docs pulls API specifications on Haiku 5.5 (0.05x cost)
> Opus 5.5 verifies synthesized diff before final sign-off
> JEV routes micro-forks in milliseconds
paste the tree and this prompt into Claude Code ↓
"Reconfigure my Claude Code setup around this tree:
1. Run with model 'opusplan' so Opus 5.5 plans the architecture and Sonnet 5.5 implements the code
2. Set CLAUDE_CODE_SUBAGENT_MODEL=haiku so all search, grep, and documentation subagents swarm on Haiku 5.5 with its native 1M context
3. Configure fallbackModel to ['sonnet', 'haiku'] in settings.json to guarantee 100% session availability
4. Add one rule to CLAUDE.md: delegate all repository searches and test runs to Haiku 5.5 subagents to keep main context under 10k tokens
5. Route fast deterministic forks (tool choice, path selection, retries) through JEV
Show me every change as a diff first. No edits until I say go"
↳ https://t.co/a2VGzSHZEn
save it, it'll come in handy