“…it is pointless to praise the light and preach it if nobody can see it. It is much more needful to teach people the art of seeing.” —C.G. Jung, CW Vol. 12
An ancient adept has said: “If the wrong man uses the right means, the right means work in the wrong way.”...[E]verything depends on the man and little or nothing on the method. The method is merely the path, the direction taken by a man...~CG Jung
It is highly probable that sexual activity, indeed the frenetic preoccupation with sex that characterises Western culture, is in many cases not the expression of sexual interest at all, but rather a search for the satisfaction of the need for contact.
— Ashley Montagu, Touching
Women don’t have standards. They have wish lists disguised as standards.
Their idea of standards is finding men above their level and expecting those men to lower their standards.
The rich man you want has to lower his standards to be with you.
The 6-foot man has to lower his standards to be with you at 5’4”.
The romantic man has to lower his standards to be with you because you’re less romantic than he is.
The chivalrous man has to lower his standards to be with you because he’s more chivalrous than you are.
You’re not the one lowering your standards. The men you’re pursuing are the ones
lowering theirs to accommodate you.
That’s the part women refuse to acknowledge.
You can meditate all you want, but if you’re not actually willing to surrender the identities, stories, and limitations you cling to, nothing changes
Time on the path means very little; some people spend decades meditating while becoming increasingly psychotic, disembodied, and reactive to triggers
I think we seek in romantic partners aspects of ourselves we are made to repress, which is why zoomers seem to like assertive, masculine-facing “mommy dommy” women (apart from signaling harmlessness).
I saw a post that was like
“dudes meet their wife on hinge and get their jobs off of indeed and wonder why their life is slop”
and I genuinely had to take a 20 min lap to think about it
Stoicism is a terrible philosophy, a philosophy that might help you run an empire, but also breeds a tyrannical son you cannot control or understand. All philosophies that attempt to control and constraint our unpleasant realities, to pretend that indifference and smallness are virtues, that believes a man is like Dostoevsky once said, "a piano key" who can be controlled and manipulated as simply as tuning and pressing down, are by design bound to fail. In attempting to cultivate indifference as a virtue, you stifle the life inside you. In the struggle of trying to be a thing you are not, in the arrogance of the attempt, you lose sight of the truth that has already been given to you in the shape and range of feelings inside your body. It is unpleasant sometimes to be human. You shouldn't mistake this unpleasantness as a design flaw that can be eradicated without consequence.
One of the most dangerous aspects of the “foid epidemic” is the impact it has on language.
I’ve discussed this before, but “foid” is a perfect term for the repetitive behavior we see from women today. Not only do they repeat the same slang phrases like “it’s giving,” but they also repeat the same behaviors.
The problem is that, beyond slang, women repeat the same talking points and narratives endlessly without questioning them. When they’re fed phrases and narratives that are detrimental to society, they become like Agent Smith in The Matrix, programmed to uphold the existing system no matter what.
The reason I say this impacts language is that our society has elevated their voices over men’s. Even in conservative spaces, older men flock to female influencers over male ones who are far more articulate.
Once women gain power in a space, they don’t just control the narrative and fight to uphold the system like Agent Smith, they control the lexicon and tonality being utilized. This is why we see so much tone policing and productive conversations devolving once women get involved.
The solutions to this problem are:
1. Remove women from the conversation entirely.
2. If that’s not possible, take the longer approach and find ways to own the narrative and regain control of the lexicon. This is why propaganda can be so effective.
Maybe a mix of both is the best approach. But if we are going to fix our problems in society, we cannot have foid speech devolving productive conversations.
We also need to develop new narratives, phrases, and terms to combat foid speech and its detrimental effects.
A tragedy of modernity is that men don't appreciate women being light, vivacious, and joyful. The reason they don't is, in part, that women don't make doing so rewarding.
Women should exist in low-stress environments as much as possible. The problem is that they, mostly, can't produce those environments themselves. That's why they need a man to provide.
But when men do provide that, women do not respond with gratitude or worse, take advantage of it.
This is really why you don’t have to worry about body count
Most men are god awful at sex
She hasn’t truly been owned or spiritually dominated before
If you’re the man that does it then it erases all other men
It’s not the quantity it’s the quality (as a general rule)
Just watched “Twisted Yoga” on Apple TV. I swear, every time I watch a sex cult documentary, it makes me embarrassed to be a woman. This “guru” required the women to do a videotaped interview while fully nude in order to qualify to join his yoga “villa”…and then they were shocked that he was having sex with all of them. And most of them went through with it because they thought it would help them reach a higher “consciousness.” Then they claimed rape. It pisses me off that their stupidity is somehow allowing them to be compared to actual rape victims. It’s infuriating.
@GODFOE_UNIVERSE She's on Stage 3 of cognitive moral development. She's listening to the crowd and then adjusting her reaction to it because she only cares what she perceives is the majority, dominant opinion. This is fine because that's how most women operate. This can be used to our advantage.