Prop Trader Voice

📰 Prop Firm News & Updates
⚠️ Rule Changes & Payout Issues
🗣️ Giving Prop Traders a Voice
🔎 News • Transparency • Accountability

[Prop Trader Voice @proptradervoice]

Prop Trader Voice starts today. 🎙️

The voice of funded traders.

Prop firm news.
Rule changes.
Payout issues.
Trader problems.
Unfair practices.

No hype. No BS.

If you’re a funded trader, follow us. 🫡

If it affects prop traders, we talk about it.

[Prop Trader Voice @proptradervoice]

@RavindraFx Congratulations 💐

[Prop Trader Voice @proptradervoice]

@RavindraFx @the5ersIndia Congratulations 💐

[Prop Trader Voice @proptradervoice]

🚨 Copy trading claim = payout denied?

If @AquaFunded has proof, show the trades and evidence.

“Copy trading” shouldn’t be a magic excuse to make a payout disappear. Traders deserve transparency. ⚠️💀

@LewisAquaFunded #SCAMALERT

[Prop world news @propworldnews]

🚨 PAYOUT DENIED. COPY TRADING CLAIM. WHERE’S THE PROOF?

A trader is publicly asking @AquaFunded and @LewisAquaFunded to release his hard-earned payout, while claiming he never copied anyone.

If the violation is real, easy.

Show the trades.
Show the evidence.
Show exactly what triggered the breach.

Because “copy trading” is a serious accusation, not a magic sentence to make a payout disappear. 💀

@AquaFunded, traders don’t need excuses.

They need evidence.

What’s your take on this case?

#SCAMALERT⚠️ #propworldnews📈

[Prop Trader Voice @proptradervoice]

🚨 @QtFunded scam exposed?

Trader requested a $2,000 payout in May but reportedly received only 10%.

After joining QT Capital, funding remains incomplete and the trader has been unable to trade due to extended maintenance.

Months later still no clear resolution.

[Prop Firms Guru @PropFirmsGuru]

Scam alert ⚠️ @QtFunded scam exposed⬇️

trader requested a $2,000 payout from QT Funded on 22 May 2026.

After multiple follow-ups, the trader was invited to move to QT Capital under an arrangement that included a monthly salary, with only 10% of that $2,000 paid immediately.

After the contract was signed, the QT Capital account was issued around 26–27 June 2026. The trader had access for two days before a system upgrade/maintenance period began.

That work was initially described as lasting two weeks and was later extended.
The trader has not been able to trade since.

QT Capital indicated the account would be funded at a multiple of the original payout figure.
The trader received a $10,000 allocation first, with the remaining amount said to follow later.

To date, the trader reports receiving only 10% of the original $2,000 and no further trading or payout progress since joining QT Capital on 25 June 2026.

The trader is asking QT Funded and QT Capital for a clear explanation of the payout status, the incomplete funding, and the extended downtime.
@AlexQuantTekel
@Finn_QTFunded .

[Prop Trader Voice @proptradervoice]

🚨 Another $3,600 payout dispute involving @EquityEdgeUK

Trader @binarybina66102 says his payout was rejected over alleged “Copy Trading” after buying a second hand phone from another user

He claims zero trades matched and provided bank proof

Still no response from Equity Edg

[Prop Firm Eye @propfirmeye]

Another trader $3,600 payout was rejected by @EquityEdgeUK…

Trader @binarybina66102 says – Equity Edge rejected his $3,600 payout & blocked him from their website, accusing him of "Copy Trading" because he purchased a second-hand phone from another user.

According to the trader, not a single trade matched between the 2 accounts. He also provided a bank transaction as proof of the phone purchase but Equity Edge has not responded.

[Prop Trader Voice @proptradervoice]

This is seriously concerning. 🚨

If @qtfunded confirmed a 3–10 business day payout window, traders shouldn’t be left waiting for weeks or months without clear answers.

Payout transparency matters. 💰

@AlexQuantTekel — traders deserve answers, not endless delays.

[Prop Firms Guru @PropFirmsGuru]

Scam alert ⚠️ @qtfunded scam exposed⬇️

"QtFunded still has not paid a trader who requested payout on 12 August".

The firm itself confirmed a 3–10 business day processing window.

That window closed weeks ago. The trader is still waiting.

This is not an isolated complaint. Many trader was reportedly restricted after asking about an unpaid withdrawal.

Payouts pending since June have also been left unresolved.

A funded-trading firm that sells access on the promise of timely profit splits cannot treat payment as optional.

Delayed payouts, shifting explanations, and pressure on traders who follow up are operational failures not processing issues.

QtFunded and @AlexQuantTekel need to settle every outstanding request on the record, publish a clear payout status, and stop hiding behind vague review delays.

[Prop Trader Voice @proptradervoice]

🚨 $50K+ PAYOUTS DENIED? 🚨

@Propshieldz claims @AquaFunded denied $23K of a $25K payout, paying just $2K.

He also alleges a previous $33K denial.

If true, traders deserve answers. 👀

RT to spread awareness.

[NexTraders @NexoraTrades]

🚨 AQUAFUNDED EXPOSED 🚨

Payout denial at peak

50 lakh + payout denials

@AquaFunded denied my friend @Propshieldz $25k payout, wiped $23k, and paid only $2k.
They claimed he traded gold (XAUUSD) during EUR news and had “short trade violations” on trades over 180 pips.
This is on top of a previous $33k denial (they paid just $3k). Total withheld: ~$53k.
I’m posting the full evidence. Please RT.

[Prop Trader Voice @proptradervoice]

A 3+ month payout delay, lost trader data and a missed refund deadline raise serious concerns.

If @Vrije__Man passed the risk interview with zero rule violations @QtFunded should address this case publicly and resolve it

Pay the trader or issue the refund. Transparency matters.

[Prop Firms Guru @PropFirmsGuru]

Scam alert ⚠️ @QtFunded scam exposed⬇️

QT Funded invited a trader @Vrije__Man to test QT 2-Step before launch.

The promise:
no payout delays.

What QT Funded delivered:

• 3-month payout delay
• Risk interview scheduled 3+ months later.
• Trader passed with zero rule violations.
• Firm said it lost the trader data
• Promised a refund in 7 days
• Day 11: no payout, no refund, just mute

QT Funded made the invite.
QT Funded made the promise.
QT Funded stalled the money.
QT Funded lost the data.
QT Funded broke the refund deadline.

Pay the trader.
Or refund the trader.
Silence is not a payout policy.

@Finn_QTFunded
@AlexQuantTekel

[Prop Trader Voice @proptradervoice]

🚨🚨$53K reportedly withheld across two payout disputes is a serious concern.

If the trader’s evidence is accurate, @AquaFunded needs to provide clear answers and explain the payout decisions transparently.

Traders deserve clarity when it comes to payouts. 🚨

[Prop Trader Voice @proptradervoice]

KYC was completed and passed, yet the funded account was disabled afterward.

If the trader is willing to verify again, @AlphaCapitalUK should review the case and provide clear answers.

Hope this gets resolved fairly. 🙏

[Ahmed @LiquidityAhmed]

$100K Account Disabled After Passing KYC

First time buying a $100K account I passed the challenge and became funded but now my account has been disabled over a KYC issue.

I personally completed the KYC and I’m ready to verify again if needed.

@AlphaCapitalUK , can someone please help review my case? 🙏

Any support or repost would mean a lot. ❤️

[Prop Trader Voice @proptradervoice]

🚨 Tradeify payout dispute

@Thewisetraderx claims two payouts were rejected over alleged copy trading:

❌ $100K — $3,221
❌ $200K — $11,328
💰 Total: $14,549

The trader denies the allegation and says the $200K account had 2 successful payouts before the third was rejected.

[The Prop Truth @theproptruth]

🚨 Tradeify payout dispute raises serious questions

A trader @Thewisetraderx claims two payouts were rejected and both funded accounts were later breached over alleged copy-trading activity:

❌ $100K account — $3,221 payout

❌ $200K account — $11,328 payout
💰 $14,549 combined

What makes the case more interesting: the trader says the $200K account had already received 2 successful payoutsbefore the third payout was rejected and the account was breached.

The trader strongly denies copy trading and says they have identified inconsistencies in the trading data provided by the firm.

They claim additional evidence has been submitted but are still waiting for a meaningful response.

If the accusation is valid, show the evidence.
If the evidence doesn’t support it, review the decision.

Payout disputes should be handled with transparency—not silence.

We’ll be watching this case.@tradify @BrettSimba

#Tradeify #PropFirms #FundedTrader #Trading #ThePropTruth

[Prop Trader Voice @proptradervoice]

🚨 Trader claims @NYSMarkets rejected his $800 payout, followed by 9 × $50K account breaches in just 10 days.

Now, he’s making another attempt with a $100K @FundedNext account.

No shortcuts. He says the comeback is personal. 👀

[Abhishek Kumar @abhishek_k30174]

When @NYSMarkets rejected my 800$ payout my physiological damage life style countless Total 9 50k account brech only 10day
But I last try 100k account with @FundedNext no shortcuts fuck the past the comeback very personal and I proof mindset & skills never die any situation ☠️🥺

[Prop Trader Voice @proptradervoice]

🚨 WHAT’S GOING ON WITH PAYOUTS AT @HolaPrimeGlobal?

Several traders have recently started questioning payout rejections.

If these reports are accurate, it’s definitely something worth keeping an eye on.

@HolaPrimeGlobal — what’s really happening here? 👀

[Prop Trader Voice @proptradervoice]

“@PhidiasPropfirm could you clarify this case involving the $8,000 payout request? What evidence is used to determine a ‘Multiple Accounts’ violation, and how does the review process work in such cases? Would be good to understand the rules and process clearly.”

[Prop Firm Eye @propfirmeye]

🚨 $8,000 Payout Denied After Being Confirmed for Processing

This trader requested payouts from 4 accounts at @PhidiasPropfirm – $2,000 × 4 = $8,000.

He received an email confirming that his payouts were successfully registered, were being processed and the funds were expected to be credited within a few hours.

More than 12 hours later, he contacted them again & was told the Payouts would be processed as quickly as possible.

However, sometime later – the decision changed. Phidias PropFirm denied the Payouts, alleging a 'Multiple Accounts' violation.

> The trader had previously received payouts from the firm without any issue.

The question is – if multiple accounts was genuinely detected, where is the evidence?

[Prop Trader Voice @proptradervoice]

“Genuine question for @InstantFunding_: Could you please clarify the review process in the case of @MukeshBaloda2 regarding the ‘Shared Computer ID’ violation? How are such cases handled when a trader is using a second-hand device? Would appreciate some clarity from both sides.”

[Prop Firm Track @propfirmtrack]

This trader $9,600 Payout Rejected by @InstantFunding_ Over Shared Computer ID.

This trader (@MukeshBaloda2) $9.6K Payout from Instant Funding was rejected after his account was flagged for a "Shared Computer ID" violation.

The trader provided proof that he purchased the laptop second-hand & said he was unaware of any previous activity linked to the device.

He requested a manual review.

[Prop Trader Voice @proptradervoice]

“Can @TradingLucid please provide clarification on this case? Understanding the specific rule application and review process would help traders better understand how such decisions are made.”

[Prop Firms Guru @PropFirmsGuru]

Scam alert ⚠️ @TradingLucid scam exposed⬇️

"trader @sukivl got permanently banned by TradingLucid based on false copy trading allegations the trader never did copy trading"

Two funded XFAs.
One near $53,450.
Accounts traded one by one, not mirrored.

After a first large green day and two more winning days, Lucid demanded KYC, locked the accounts, and issued a lifetime ban the next morning.

One evaluation had ~$3,550 in profit.
The other combine was already passed.

No trade logs.
No timestamps.
No counterpart account.
No warning.

Just a lockout the moment the trader was green and close to payout.

This is the Lucid pattern:
collect fees, ignore losing accounts, then ambush profitable traders at KYC with a vague label and keep the payout.

A firm that funds traders shows the tape.
A firm that harvests them hides behind copy trading, closes the ticket, and calls it final.

@ajtradinglucid which exact trades prove copy trading with another person?

Why did the lockout hit after winning days, not while the accounts were flat?

Why no evidence before a permanent ban?

How many green accounts get killed at payout versus red ones?

Publish the proof or admit the profit was the problem.

@TheTrustedProp
@PropFirmMatch

[Prop Trader Voice @proptradervoice]

“Could you please clarify this case? What specific rule was breached that resulted in the payout rejection and account disqualification? Also, was this rule clearly disclosed to the trader before they reached the funded stage?”