Bont had the worst Expected Points Value on the ground, stronger case he was the least valuable player, not the 4th most.
He still got into great positions (+6.3 receiving points added) but his disposals cost the Dogs ~15 points.
Bont's one of the best kicks in the game so this won't repeat, but Player Votes should reward value added in that game, not who you'd back next week.
Egregious Player Votes - an occasional new series here at HI.
Now, we love Bont, who doesn’t.
But if 10 turnovers running at a disposal efficiency of 46%, with 2/3rds of them gained in the back half in a 40 point loss earns you the 4th best player on the ground - then we’re all confused.
Our backline may as well not exist.
@BenShindel Death toll still probably not even half that of the protests yet which is wild (HRANA estimate of war deaths ~3400, HRANA confirmed protest deaths which is self-admittedly and undercount ~7000)
In game win probability at 92% for Port going into Q4, Tigers actually keeping it pretty close on xScore but misses by the youngsters keeping them 4-5 goals behind