@elonmusk The 4.6% is for all the other candidates combined, not for each candidate. That's just a botched graphic from a news outlet that doesn't know how to present data.
Was there fraud? Yes, of course. But this is not the evidence of it
@EmmaRincon Bueno obviamente quieren decir que todos los demás candidatos sacaron 4,6% en total. El fraude no está en discusión (claro que lo hubo), pero ésto es irrelevante
Today, the options for developer tooling are pretty much endless. This is a good thing, and @jimmidyson is taking a look at the lessons learned along the way in our latest @d2iq_eng blog: https://t.co/wMqC0VHvhs
Hey @BinanceUS, if this is true: "several of our banking partners unilaterally and without warning restricted access to the accounts that custody customer USD funds," then you should name and shame those shitty "partners"
@ecohen16 "An accredited investor’s income is calculated by adding the value of their total assets and subtracting their total liabilities or debts, besides any mortgages on their primary home."
That seems... wrong? did you mean "net worth"?
https://t.co/fkRfeRSHI3
@nfthud This has been handled really poorly. From the lack of swift action and communication during the attack, to now hurting your early supporters by devaluing the token they bought. Disappointing
@0xTheMMM@R4vonus@DawsonMatarese @meta_pals @nfthud Sure, you can't prevent hacks 100%, but you can certainly reduce risks.
What is more telling is their response to the hack so far. Their response has been a tweet. That's it. That's not good enough
@josh_scampton@SlemanNgepit @YaroslavMaslow No, he's not legit, it's another scam. The 0.3 ETH you lost are gone forever and unrecoverable. The only hope you have is that _maybe_ NFT Hud will reimburse if they're feeling generous. Sorry :(
@Davie504bass congrats on the 5M subs! tee hee hee
Also, you should play a tiny bass like this one:
https://t.co/IR9NgCoC6x
(I still don't know if that's a gigantic dude or a tiny bass, or both).